Advertisement

Autoethnography, Women and Sport

  • Karen Throsby
Chapter

Abstract

Autoethnography has found purchase in the field of sport in ways that have been particularly useful for female athlete-researchers, offering an opportunity to make visible the overlooked experiences of pleasure and physicality that are conventionally treated as antithetical to femininity. However, it is also a contested method, and accusations of solipsism, self-indulgence and emotionality attach easily to it in profoundly gendered ways. Drawing on a diverse range of women’s autoethnographic writing on sport, this chapter explores the ways in which autoethnography aligns with wider feminist concerns, and addresses some of the many critiques of autoethnography and responses to those challenges. The chapter concludes that autoethnography remains a valuable intellectual and creative resource for the study of women and sport, enabling us to think and speak differently about women’s embodied experiences in a domain so normatively defined by masculinity.

References

  1. Allen-Collinson, J. (2011). Running embodiment, power and vulnerability: Notes toward a feminist phenomenology of female running. In E. Kennedy & P. Markula (Eds.), Women and exercise: The body, health and consumerism (pp. 280–298). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Allen-Collinson, J., & Hockey, J. (2005). Autoethnography: Self-indulgence or rigorous methodology? In M. McNamee (Ed.), Philosophy and the sciences of exercise, health and sport (pp. 187–202). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Allen-Collinson, J., & Hockey, J. (2011). Feeling the way: Notes toward a haptic phenomenology of distance running and scuba diving. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 46(3), 330–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allen-Collinson, J., & Owton, H. (2015). Intense embodiment: Senses of heat in women’s running and boxing. Body & Society, 21(2), 245–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, L. (2006). Analytic autoethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35, 373–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anderson, L., & Austin, M. (2012). Auto-ethnography in leisure studies. Leisure Studies, 31(2), 131–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Atkinson, M. (2008). Triathlon, suffering and exciting significance. Leisure Studies, 27(2), 165–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Atkinson, P. (2006). Rescuing autoethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35(4), 400–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Behar, R. (1996). The vulnerable observer: Anthropology that breaks your heart. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bolin, A., & Granskog, J. (Eds.). (2003). Athletic intruders: Ethnographic research on women, culture and exercise. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  11. Carless, D. (2012). Negotiating sexuality and masculinity in school sport: An autoethnography. Sport, Education and Society, 17(5), 607–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coffey, A. (1999). The ethnographic self: Fieldwork and the representation of identity. London: Safe.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dashper, K. (2013). Getting better: An autoethnographic tale of recovery from sporting injury. Sociology of Sport Journal, 30, 323–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Delamont, S. (2007). Arguments against auto-ethnography. Qualitative Research, 4.Google Scholar
  15. Denison, J., & Markula, P. (Eds.). (2003a). Moving writing: Crafting movement in sport research. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  16. Denison, J., & Markula, P. (2003b). Introduction: Moving writing. In J. Denison & P. Markula (Eds.), Moving writing: Crafting movement in sport research (pp. 1–24). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  17. Douglas, K. (2009). Storying my self: Negotiating a relational identity in professional sport. Qualitative Research in Sport and Exercise, 1(2), 176–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Douglas, K. (2014). Challenging interpretive privilege in elite and professional sport: One [athlete’s] story, revised, reshaped and reclaimed. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 6(2), 220–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Downey, G. (2005). Learning Capoeira: Lessons in cunning from an Afro-Brazilian art. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Ellis, C. (1999). Heartful autoethnography. Qualitative Health Research, 9(5), 669–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ellis, C. (2004). The ethnographic I: A methodological novel about autoethnography. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press.Google Scholar
  22. Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. (2006). Analyzing analytic autoethnography: An autopsy. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35, 429–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fleming, C., & Fullagar, S. (2007). Reflexive methodologies: An autoethnography of the gendered performance of sport/management. Annals of Leisure Research, 10(3–4), 238–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haraway, D. (1996). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. In E. F. Keller & H. E. Longino (Eds.), Feminism and science (pp. 249–263). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hockey, J. (2005a). Injured distance runners: A case of identity work as self-help. Sociology of Sport Journal, 21, 38–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hockey, J. (2005b). Sensing the run: The senses and distance running. Senses and Society, 1(2), 183–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Howes, D. (2005). Introduction: Empire of the senses. In D. Howes (Ed.), The empire of the senses: The sensual culture reader (pp. 1–17). Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  28. Khan, C. A. (2009). Go play in traffic: Skating, gender and urban context. Qualitative Inquiry, 15(6), 1084–1102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Larsen, J. (2014). (Auto)ethnography and cycling. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 17(1), 59–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lorde, A. (1984). Sister outsider. Freedom, CA: Crossing Press.Google Scholar
  31. Markula, P. (2001). Bodily dialogues: Writing the self. International Sports Studies, 23(1/2), 24–29.Google Scholar
  32. Markula, P. (2003). Body dialogues: Writing the self. In J. Denison & P. Markula (Eds.), Moving writing: Crafting movement in sport research (pp. 27–50). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  33. Markula, P. (Ed.). (2005a). Feminist sport studies: Sharing experiences of joy and pain. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  34. Markula, P. (2005b). Introduction. In P. Markula (Ed.), Feminist sport studies: Sharing experiences of joy and pain (pp. 1–21). New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  35. McParland, S. (2013). The gender game: Rewriting the rules of basketball through autoethnography. Sport History Review, 44, 25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Miller, T. (2008). Sport, authenticity, confession. Cultural Studies <=> Critical Methodologies, 8(4), 540–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Popovic, M. L. (2010). A voice in the rink: Playing with our histories and evoking autoethnography. Journal of Sport History, 37(2), 235–255.Google Scholar
  38. Purdy, L., Potrac, P., & Jones, R. (2008). Power, consent and resistance: An autoethnography of competitive rowing. Sport, Education and Society, 13(3), 319–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Richardson, L. (2000). New writing practices in qualitative research. Sociology of Sport Journal, 17(1), 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Scott, S. (2009). Reclothing the emperor: The swimming pool as negotiated order. Symbolic Interaction, 32(2), 123–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shildrick, M. (1997). Leaky bodies and boundaries: Feminism, postmodernism and (bio) ethics. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Sparkes, A. (2000). Autoethnography and narratives of self: Reflections on criteria in action. Sociology of Sport Journal, 17(1), 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Spinney, J. (2006). A place of sense: A kinaesthetic ethnography of cyclists on Mont Ventoux. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 24, 709–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stanley, L. (1992). The autobiographical I. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Stanley, L. (1996). The mother of invention: Necessity, writing and representation. Feminism and Psychology, 6(1), 45–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Thorpe, H., Barbour, K., & Bruce, T. (2011). “Wandering and wondering”: Theory and representation in feminist physical cultural studies. Sociology of Sport Journal, 28(1), 106–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Throsby, K. (2013). “If I go in like a cranky sea-lion, I come out like a smiling dolphin”: Marathon swimming and the unexpected pleasures of being a body in water. Feminist Review, 103, 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Throsby, K. (2015). Unlikely becomings: Passion, swimming and learning to love the sea. In M. Brown & B. Humberstone (Eds.), Seascapes: Shaped by the sea: Embodied narratives and fluid geographies. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  49. Throsby, K. (2016). Immersion: Marathon swimming, identity and embodiment. Manchester: Manchester University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tsang, T. (2000). Let me tell you a story: A narrative exploration of identity in high-performance sport. Sociology of Sport Journal, 17, 44–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wacquant, L. (2004). Body & soul: Notebooks of an apprentice boxer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Wheaton, B., & Tomlinson, A. (1998). The changing gender order in sport? The case of windsurfing subculture. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 22(3), 252–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Young, I. M. (2010). The exclusion of women from sport: Conceptual and existential dimensions. In P. Davis & C. Weaving (Eds.), Philosophical perspectives on gender in sport and physical activity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. Zanker, C., & Gard, M. (2008). Fatness, fitness and the moral universe of sport and physical activity. Sociology of Sport Journal, 25(1), 48–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karen Throsby
    • 1
  1. 1.University of LeedsLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations