Skip to main content

Embodied Ways of Knowing: Revisiting Feminist Epistemology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Feminist scholarship has developed a focus on articulating alternative women’s ways of knowing and validating women’s experiences. The focus of my feminist interest in epistemology began with my attempt to understand my role as knower, and to contribute to the development of multiple and alternative “knowledges”. Key critiques of Western epistemology and dualistic ontology informed the development of feminist and phenomenological understandings of embodiment and embodied ways of knowing. Feminist writing about women’s movement experiences, considering the examples of throwing a ball, climbing, long-distance running and rowing, all offered contributions to alternative knowledges. In particular, through embodied ways of knowing as a dancer, I hope to offer insights relevant to other embodied practitioners in sport, leisure and physical activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Portions of this chapter are based upon my doctoral research (Barbour, 2002) and published works (Barbour, 2004, 2011a, 2011b) re-used with permission.

  2. 2.

    Plato lived 428–348 BC and Aristotle lived 384–322 BC (Allen, 1966).

  3. 3.

    Rene Descartes lived 1596–1650 (Descartes, 1968) and Immanuel Kant lived 1724–1804 (Scruton, 1982).

  4. 4.

    These dualisms are debated at length in feminist literature.

  5. 5.

    For discussion about women’s ways of knowing as a developmental scheme, see Code (1991).

  6. 6.

    The feminists here represent a range of feminist perspectives and each offered a slightly different understanding of body. I adapted understandings as relevant.

References

  • Albright, A. C. (1997). Choreographing difference. The body and identity in contemporary dance. Hanover, NH: Wesleyan University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen-Collinson, J. (2008). Running the routes together: Corunning and knowledge in action. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 37(1), 38–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen-Collinson, J. (2011). Feminist phenomonology and the woman in the running body. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, 5(3), 297–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, R. E. (Ed.). (1966). Greek philosophy: Thales to Artistotle. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, K. N. (2002). Embodied ways of knowing: Women’s solo contemporary dance in Aotearoa. PhD thesis, Faculty of Education, University of Waikato, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, K. N. (2004). Embodied ways of knowing. Waikato Journal of Education, 10, 227–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, K. N. (2011a). Dancing across the page: Narrative and embodied ways of knowing. Bristol, UK: Intellect Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, K. N. (2011b). Writing, dancing, embodied knowing: Autoethnographic research. In D. Davida (Ed.), Fields in motion: Ethnography in the worlds of dance (pp. 101–117). Canada: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Beauvoir, S. (1972). The second sex (H. M. Parshley, Trans.). Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Beauvoir, S. (2010). The second sex (C. Borde & S. Malovany-Chevallier, Trans.). New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (Eds.). (1986). Women’s ways of knowing. The development of self, voice and mind. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigwood, C. (1991). Renaturalizing the body (with the help of Merleau-Ponty). Hypatia, 6(3), 54–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (1994). Nomadic subjects. Embodiment and sexual difference in contemporary feminist theory. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caudwell, J. (2014). ‘Feeling blue’: The ordinary pleasures of mundane motion. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, (ahead of print), 2–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, D. (2008). Climbing like a girl: An exemplary adventure in feminist phenomenology. Hypatia, 23(1), 9–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Code, L. (1991). What can she know? Feminist theory and the construction of knowledge. New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davion, V. (1994). Is ecofeminism feminist? In K. Warren (Ed.), Ecological feminism (pp. 8–28). London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debold, E., Toman, D., & Brown, L. M. (1996). Embodying knowledge, knowing desire. Authority and split subjectivities in girl’s epistemological development. In N. R. Goldberger, J. Tarule, B. Clinchy, & M. Belenky (Eds.), Knowledge, difference and power. Essays inspired by women’s ways of knowing (pp. 85–125). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R. (1968). Discourse on method and the meditations (F. E. Sutcliffe, Trans.). England: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diprose, R. (1994/1995). Performing body-identity. Writings on Dance, 11/12, 6–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Plessis, R., & Alice, L. (1998). Feminisms, connections and differences. In R. Du Plessis & L. Alice (Eds.), Feminist thought in Aotearoa, New Zealand, connections and differences (pp. xv–xx). Auckland, New Zealand: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flax, J. (1993). Disputed subjects: Essays on psychoanalysis, politics and philosophy. London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraleigh, S. H. (1987). Dance and the lived body. A descriptive aesthetics. Pittsburg, PA: University of Pittsburg Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatens, M. (1995). Imaginary bodies. Ethics, power and corporeality. London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberger, N. R. (1996). Looking backward, looking forward. In N. R. Goldberger, J. M. Tarule, B. M. Clinchy, & M. F. Belenky (Eds.), Knowledge, difference and power. Essays inspired by women’s ways of knowing (pp. 1–17). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberger, N. R., Tarule, J. M., Clinchy, B. M., & Belenky, M. F. (Eds.). (1996). Knowledge, difference and power. Essays inspired by women’s ways of knowing. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosz, E. (1994). Volatile bodies. Toward a corporeal feminism. Australia: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S., & Hintikka, M. B. (Eds.). (1983). Discovering reality. Feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics, methodology and philosophy of science. Dordretch, Holland, Boston & London: D. Reidel Publishing Co..

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartsok, N. C. M. (1983). The feminist standpoint: Developing the grounds for a specifically feminist historical materialism. In S. Harding & M. B. Hintikka (Eds.), Discovering reality. Feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics, methodology and philosophy of science (pp. 283–310). Dordretch, Holland, Boston & London: D. Reidel Publishing Co..

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkesworth, M. E. (1989). Knowers, knowing, known: Feminist theory and claims of truth. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 14(3), 533–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hills, L. (2002). Climbing free: My life in the vertical world. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irigaray, L. (1985). This sex which is not one (C. Porter, Trans.). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagger, A. M., & Bordo, S. R. (Eds.). (1989). Gender/body/knowledge. Feminist reconstructions of being and knowing. New Brunswick & London: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, E. F., & Grontkowski, C. R. (1983). The mind’s eye. In S. Harding & M. B. Hintikka (Eds.), Discovering reality. Feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics, methodology and philosophy of science (pp. 207–224). Holland, Boston & London: D. Reidel Publishing Co..

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruks, S. (2014). ‘Women’s lived experience’: Feminism and phenomenology from Simone de Beauvoir to the present. In M. Evans, C. Hemmings, & M. Henry (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of feminist theory (pp. 75–92). London: Sage Publications Ltd.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). The phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964a). The primacy of perception. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964b). Signs (R. C. McCleary, Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, S. (1997). Discourse. London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nettleton, S., & Watson, J. (Eds.). (1998). The body in everyday life. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scruton, R. (1982). Kant. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheets-Johnstone, M. (1966). The phenomenology of dance. Madison & Milwakee, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheets-Johnstone, M. (1999). The primacy of movement. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Co..

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, L. (Ed.). (1990). Feminist praxis: Research, theory and epistemology in feminist sociology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, L., & Wise, S. (1990). Method, methodology and epistemology in feminist research processes. In L. Stanley (Ed.), Feminist praxis: Research, theory and epistemology in feminist sociology (pp. 20–60). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinson, S. W. (1995). Body of knowledge. Educational Theory, 45(1), 43–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, K. J. (1996). Ecological feminist philosophies. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weedon, C. (1987). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, G. (1999). Body images. Embodiment as intercorporeality. New York & London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, S. J., & Bendelow, G. (1998). The lived body. Sociological themes, embodied issues. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. (1980). Throwing like a girl. In I. M. Young (Ed.), Throwing like a girl (pp. 141–159). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. (1998a). Situated bodies. Throwing like a girl. In D. Welton (Ed.), Body and flesh. A philosophical reader (pp. 259–273). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. (1998b). “Throwing like a girl”: Twenty years later. In D. Welton (Ed.), Body and flesh. A philosophical reader (pp. 286–290). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Barbour, K. (2018). Embodied Ways of Knowing: Revisiting Feminist Epistemology. In: Mansfield, L., Caudwell, J., Wheaton, B., Watson, B. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Feminism and Sport, Leisure and Physical Education. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53318-0_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53318-0_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-53317-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-53318-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics