Skip to main content

Conceptualising ‘Inside’ and ‘Outside’

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Prison Boundary

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology ((PSIPP))

  • 909 Accesses

Abstract

What is the prison boundary? Where is it located? Which processes and performances help construct and animate it, and who takes part in them? In ‘Conceptualising ‘Inside’ and ‘Outside”, Turner details not only what is meant when we use this terminology, but where the boundary lies, who is co-constituted in its (re)production, and how it comes to be (co)constructed. This chapter appraises the wealth of multi-disciplinary literature that attends to spaces of incarceration, highlighting opportunities to further interrogate the prison boundary. Drawing on geographic interpretations of borders and boundaries, Turner identifies an opportunity to interrogate cultural manifestations of the assumed binary between inside and outside, particularly in relation to the prison as a specific space of production and consumption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Peterhead prison was closed in 2014. Its replacement, HMP Grampian, was built alongside it and opened in March 2014. The house blocks are now even closer to the cliff edge.

  2. 2.

    Geopolitics can be described as the study of the influence of such factors as economics, geography and demography on the politics of a state, and in particular its foreign policy. Biopolitics (drawing on the work of the likes of Michel Foucault, Giorgio Agamben, Paolo Virno and Maurizio Lazzarato) is concerned with the influence of such practices of power on the individual and his body.

  3. 3.

    This returns us to the larger discourse of exclusion relating to the threat of undesirables.

  4. 4.

    In some countries prisoners are permitted to have extended visits, which may incorporate overnight stay in designated accommodation with spouses and/or children. Conjugal visits are not permitted in the UK.

  5. 5.

    This book alludes to theoretical considerations of gender in its feminist methodological tendencies; through comments surrounding prisoner work and familial expectations—the working father, as an example—(see Chap. 5 ); and indeed through my own positionality as a tourism participant (see Chap. 4 ). These themes are necessarily present, but not predominant, in my particular considerations of the inside/outside boundary.

Bibliography

  • Ackelson, Jason. 2005. Constructing Security on the US-Mexico Border. Political Geography 24(2): 165–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adey, Peter. 2009. Facing Airport Security: Affect, Biopolitics, and the Preemptive Securitisation of the Mobile Body. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 27(2): 274–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agnew, John. 2008. Borders on the Mind: Re-Framing Border Thinking. Ethics & Global Politics 1(4): 175–191.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Åkerström, Malin. 1986. Outcasts in Prison: The Cases of Informers and Sex Offenders. Deviant Behavior 7(1): 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amoore, Louise. 2006. Biometric Borders: Governing Mobilities in the War on Terror. Political Geography 25(3): 336–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Benedict. 1991. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Malcolm. 1996. Frontiers: Territory and State Formation in the Modern World. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreas, Peter. 2003. Redrawing the Line: Borders and Security in the Twenty-First Century. International Security 28(2): 78–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Applegate, Brandon K., Francis T. Cullen, and Bonnie S. Fisher. 1997. Public Support for Correctional Treatment: The Continuing Appeal of the Rehabilitative Appeal. The Prison Journal 77: 237–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, Leonard D., and Bodil Ravneberg. 2008. The Outside and Inside in Norwegian and English Prisons. Geografiska Annaler Series B-Human Geography 90B(2): 205–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baird, Ian G. 2010. Making Spaces: The Ethnic Brao People and the International Border Between Laos and Cambodia. Geoforum 41(2): 271–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Zygmunt. 2000. Social Issues of Law and Order. British Journal of Criminology 40(2): 205–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckett, Katherine, and Steve Herbert. 2010. Penal Boundaries: Banishment and the Expansion of Punishment. Law and Social Inquiry—Journal of the American Bar Foundation 35(1): 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, Eiki, and Henk van Houtum. 2003. Routing Borders Between Territories, Discourses, and Practices. Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, Fred S., and Harold M. Malin. 1991. Media Distortion of the Public’s Perception of Recidivism and Psychiatric Rehabilitation. American Journal of Psychiatry 148(11): 1572–1576.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bigo, Didier. 2002. Security and Immigration: Toward a Critique of the Governmentality of Unease. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 27(1): 63–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, Mary. 2007a. Creating the Responsible Prisoner: Federal Admission and Orientation Packs. Punishment & Society: International Journal of Penology 9(1): 67–85.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007b. Identity, Citizenship, and Punishment. In Race, Gender, and Punishment: From Colonialism to the War on Terror, eds. Mary Bosworth, and Jeanne Flavin, 134–148. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, Mary, Debi Campbell, Bonita Demby, Seth M. Ferranti, and Michael Santos. 2005. Doing Prison Research: Views From Inside. Qualitative Inquiry 11(2): 249–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Elizabeth. 2014. Expanding Carceral Geographies: Challenging Mass Incarceration and Creating a ‘Community Orientation’ Towards Juvenile Delinquency. Geographica Helvetica 69: 377–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, Angela, Alissa Cambier, and Suzanne Agha. 2011. Prisons Within Prisons: The use of Segregation in the United States. Federal Sentencing Reporter 24(1): 46–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blatter, Joachim K. 2001. Debordering the World of States: Towards a Multi-level System in Europe and a Multi-polity System in North America? Insights from Border Regions. European Journal of International Relations 7(2): 175–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldeira, Teresa P.R. 2000. City of Walls: Crime, Segregation, and Citizenship in São Paulo. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavender, Gray. 2004. Media and Crime Policy: A Reconsideration of David Garland’s the Culture of Control. Punishment & Society: International Journal of Penology 6(3): 335–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheliotis, Leonidas K. 2010. The Ambivalent Consequences of Visibility: Crime and Prisons in the Mass Media. Crime Media Culture 6(2): 169–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christian, Johnna. 2005. Riding the Bus: Barriers to Prison Visitation and Family Management Strategies. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 21(1): 31–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Combessie, Philippe. 2002. Marking the Carceral Boundary: Penal Stigma in the Long Shadow of the Prison. Ethnography 3(4): 535–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comfort, Megan L. 2003. In the Tube at San Quentin: The ‘Secondary Prisonization’ of Women Visiting Inmates. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 32(1): 77–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Mary L. 2012a. Harmony Within the Walls: Perceptions of Worthiness and Competence in a Community Prison Choir. International Journal of Music Education 30(1): 46–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, Adam. 2011. From the Shopping Mall to the Street Corner: Dynamics of Exclusion in the Governance of Public Space. In International and Comparative Criminal Justice and Urban Governance, ed. Adam Crawford, 483–518. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, Tim. 1996. In Place-Out of Place: Geography, Ideology, and Transgression. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Angela, and Gina Dent. 2001. Prison as a Border: A Conversation on Gender, Globalization, and Punishment. Signs 26(4): 1235–1241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Mike. 1998. City of Quartz: Excavating the Future in Los Angeles. London: Pimlico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz-Cotto, Juanita. 1996. Gender, Ethnicity and the State: Latina and Latino Prison Politics. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, Michael. 2002a. Network Society, Network-Centric Warfare and the State of Emergency. Theory Culture & Society 19(4): 71–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002b. Reshaping National Intelligence for an Age of Information. International Affairs 78(2): 424–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earle, Rod. 2014. Insider and Out Making Sense of a Prison Experience and a Research Experience. Qualitative Inquiry 20(4): 429–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, Keith. 1992. The Modern Prison as Total Institution? Public Perception Versus Objective Reality. Crime & Delinquency 38(1): 6–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiddler, Michael. 2010. Four Walls and What Lies Within: The Meaning of Space and Place in Prisons. Prison Service Journal 187: 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1983. Afterword: The Subject and Power. In Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, eds. Hubert L. Dreyfus, and Paul Rabinow, 208–226. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. (2003). Abnormal: Lectures at the Collège de France 1974–1975 (trans: Burchell, Graham). London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, Yvonne. 2013. Business as Usual? Prison Video Link in the Multilingual Courtroom. In Interpreting in a Changing Landscape: Selected Papers From Critical Link 6, eds. Christina Schäffner, Krzysztof Kredens, and Yvonne Fowler, 225–248. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fyfe, Nicholas R., and Jon Bannister. 1996. City Watching: Closed Circuit Television Surveillance in Public Spaces. Area 28(1): 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, Nick. 2009. Governmental Mobility: The Power Effects of the Movement of Detained Asylum Seekers Around Britain’s Detention Estate. Political Geography 28(3): 186–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, Ruth W. 2007. Golden Gulag: Prisons, Surpluses, Crisis, and Opposition in Globalizing California. London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Stuart. 1978. Policing the Crisis: Mugging, the State, and Law and Order. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, Martyn. 2015. Research ‘Inside’ Viewed from ‘Outside’: Reflections on Prison Ethnography. In Palgrave Handbook of Prison Ethnography, eds. Deborah H. Drake, Rod Earle, and Jennifer Sloan, 21–39. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt, Bernard E. 2005. Policing LA’s Skid Row: Crime and Real Estate Development [An Experiment in Real Time]. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 325–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, Martha L., Francis T. Cullen, Leo Carroll, and William Feinberg. 2000. Race, Rights, and Order in Prison: A National Survey of Wardens on the Racial Integration of Prison Cells. The Prison Journal 80(3): 295–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henriques, Ursula R.Q. 1972. The Rise and Decline of the Separate System of Prison Discipline. Past & Present 54: 61–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbert, Steve. 1997. Policing Space: Territoriality and the Los Angeles Police Department. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hugunin, James. 1999. A Survey of the Representation of Prisoners in the United States: Discipline and Photographs—The Prison Experience. Lampeter: Edwin Mellen Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyndman, Jennifer, and Malathi de Alwis. 2004. Bodies, Shrines, and Roads: Violence, (Im)Mobility and Displacement in Sri Lanka. Gender, Place and Culture 11(4): 535–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewkes, Yvonne. 2002. Captive Audience: Media, Masculinity and Power in Prisons. Collumpton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Corey, and Reece Jones. 2011. Rethinking “the Border” in Border Studies. In Corey Johnson, Reece Jones, Anssi Paasi, Louise Amoore, Alison Mountz, Mark Salter, and Chris Rumford. 2011. Interventions on Rethinking “The Border” in Border Studies. Political Geography 30(2): 61–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, Denise. 1995. Parent–Child Visitation in the Jail or Prison. In Children of Incarcerated Parents, eds. Katherine Gabel, and Denise Johnston, 135–143. New York, NY: Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Reece. 2009a. Agents of Exception: Border Security and the Marginalization of Muslims in India. Environment and Planning D: Society & Space 27(5): 879–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009b. Categories, Borders and Boundaries. Progress in Human Geography 33(2): 174–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kedar, Benjamin Z. 1996. Expulsion as an Issue of World History. Journal of World History 7(2): 165–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konrad, Victor, and Heather N. Nicol. 2011. Border Culture, the Boundary Between Canada and the United States of America, and the Advancement of Borderlands Theory. Geopolitics 16(1): 70–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, Stephen D. 1985. Structural Conflict: The Third World Against Global Liberalism. London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenz, Nygel. 2002. ‘Luxuries’ in Prison: The Relationship Between Amenity Funding and Public Support. Crime & Delinquency 48(4): 499–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levi, Michael, and David S. Wall. 2004. Technologies, Security, and Privacy in the post-9/11 European Information Society. Journal of Law and Society 31(2): 194–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebling, Alison. 1999. Doing Research in Prison: Breaking the Silence? Theoretical Criminology 3(2): 147–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. Prison Officers, Policing and the Use of Discretion. Theoretical Criminology 4(3): 333–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loyd, Jenna, Andrew Burridge, and Matthew L. Mitchelson. 2009. Thinking (and Moving) Beyond Walls and Cages: Bridging Immigrant Justice and Anti-Prison Organizing in the United States. Social Justice 36(2(116): 85–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, Mona. 2001. From the Punitive City to the Gated Community: Security and Segregation Across the Social and Penal Landscape. University of Miami Law Review 56(1): 601–623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Lauren L., and Matthew L. Mitchelson. 2009. Geographies of Detention and Imprisonment: Interrogating Spatial Practices of Confinement, Discipline, Law, and State Power. Geography Compass 3(1): 459–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maruna, Shadd. 2001. Making Good: How Ex-convicts Reform and Rebuild Their Lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClintock, Anne. 2009. Paranoid Empire: Specters from Guantánamo and Abu Ghraib. Small Axe 13(1): 50–74.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • McRobbie, Angela, and Sarah L. Thornton. 1995. Rethinking ‘Moral Panic’ for Multi-Mediated Social Worlds. The British Journal of Sociology 46(4): 559–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Don. 2000. Cultural Geography: A Critical Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, Dominique. 2013a. Between Outside and inside? Prison visiting rooms as Liminal Carceral Spaces. GeoJournal 78(2): 339–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013b. Carceral Geography and the Spatialities of Prison Visiting: Visitation, Recidivism, and Hyperincarceration. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 31(1): 174–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Carceral Geography: Spaces and Practices of Incarceration. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mountz, Alison, and Jenna Loyd. 2014. Transnational Productions of Remoteness: Building Onshore and Offshore Carceral Regimes Across Borders. Geographica Helvetica 69: 389–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, David, ed. 1999. Boundaries, Territory, and Postmodernity. Portland, OR: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, David and Paasi, Anssi. 1998. Fences and Neighbours in the Postmodern World: Boundary Narratives in Political Geography. Progress in Human Geography 22(2): 186–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. (2003). Boundaries. In The Companion to Political Geography, eds. John Agnew, Katharyne Mitchell, and Gerard Toal, 122–136. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, Mary-Frances. 2004. Finding Boundaries Inside Prison Walls: Case Study of a Terminally Ill Inmate. Death Studies 28(1): 63–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of the Attorney General. (2001). Memorandum: Interviews Regarding International Terrorism to All United States Attorneys and Members of the Anti-terrorism Task Forces. Unpublished Memorandum, November 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogborn, Miles. 1995. Discipline, Government and Law: Separate Confinement in the Prisons of England and Wales, 1830–1877. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 20(3): 295–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohmae, Kenichi. 1992. The Borderless World: Power and Strategy in the Global Marketplace. London: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paasi, Anssi. 1996. Territories, Boundaries, and Consciousness: The Changing Geographies of the Finnish–Russian Boundary. New York, NY: J. Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. Boundaries as Social Processes: Territoriality in the World of Flows. In Boundaries, Territory and Postmodernity, ed. David Newman, 69–88. Portland, OR: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pakes, Francis J. 2012. Globalisation and the Challenge to Criminology. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Howard, Pratt and Beyond: Assessing the Value of Carceral Tours as a Comparative Method. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 54(3): 265–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pallot, Judith. 2005. Russia’s Penal Peripheries: Space, Place and Penalty in Soviet and Post-Soviet Russia. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 30(1): 98–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, Jamie. 2003. Geography and Public Policy: Mapping the Penal State. Progress in Human Geography 27(2): 222–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piché, Justin, and Kevin Walby. 2010. Problematizing Carceral Tours. British Journal of Criminology 50(3): 570–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Carceral Tours and the Need for Reflexivity: A Response: A Response to Wilson, Spina and Canaan. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 51(4): 411–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, John. 2002. Punishment and Civilization: Penal Tolerance and Intolerance in Modern Society. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruijt, Hans. 2013. Culture Wars, Revanchism, Moral Panics and the Creative City. A Reconstruction of a Decline of Tolerant Public Policy: The Case of Dutch Anti-squatting Legislation. Urban Studies 50(6): 1114–1129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quina, Kathryn, Ann Varna Garis, John Stevenson, Maria Garrido, Jody Brown, Roberta Richman, et al. 2007. Through the Bullet-proof Glass: Conducting Research in Prison Settings. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation: The Official Journal of The International Society for the Study of Dissociation (ISSD) 8(2): 123–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridgley, Jennifer. 2008. Cities of Refuge: Immigration Enforcement, Police, and the Insurgent Genealogies of Citizenship in US Sanctuary Cities. Urban Geography 29(1): 53–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, Loren H. 1971. Territoriality and Homosexuality in a Male Prison Population. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 41(3): 510–513.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, John G. 1993. Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations. International Organization 47(1): 139–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumford, Chris. 2008. Introduction: Citizens and Borderwork in Europe. Space and Polity 12(1): 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, Edward. 1996[1978]. Orientalism. New York, NY: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salter, Mark B. 2004. Passports, Mobility, and Security: How Smart Can the Border Be? International Studies Perspectives 5(1): 71–91.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Saum, Christine A., Hilary L. Surratt, James A. Inciardi, and Rachael E. Bennett. 1995. Sex in Prison: Exploring the Myths and Realities. The Prison Journal 75(4): 413–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, Andrew. 1997. Essentialism, Social Constructionism, and Beyond. The Sociological Review 45(3): 453–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sibley, David. 1995. Geographies of Exclusion: Society and Difference in the West. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibley, David, and Bettina Van Hoven. 2009. The Contamination of Personal Space: Boundary Construction in a Prison Environment. Area 41(2): 198–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, Jennifer, and Serena Wright. 2015. Going in Green: Reflections on the Challenges of ‘Getting in, Getting on, and Getting out’ for Doctoral Researchers. In Palgrave Handbook of Prison Ethnography, eds. Deborah H. Drake, Rod Earle, and Jennifer Sloan, 143–168. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Hayden P. 2013. Reinforcing Experiential Learning in Criminology: Definitions, Rationales, and Missed Opportunities Concerning Prison Tours in the United States. Journal of Criminal Justice Education 24(1): 50–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Hayden P., Benjamin Meade, and Barbara A. Koons-Witt. 2009. The Utility of the Correctional Tour: Student Perceptions and the Propensity for Academic Growth. Journal of Criminal Justice Education 20(3): 292–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparke, Matthew. 2006. A Neoliberal Nexus: Citizenship, Security and the Future of the Border. Political Geography 30(2): 151–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, Richard. 2002. Out of the ‘Digger’: The Warrior’s Honour and the Guilty Observer. Ethnography 3(4): 556–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spaulding, Susanna. 2011. Borderland Stories About Teaching College in Prison. New Directions for Community Colleges 155: 73–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Squires, Peter. 2008. ASBO Nation: The Criminalisation of Nuisance. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, Vivien. 1998. Sin Against the Future: Imprisonment in the World. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stumpf, Juliet P. 2011. Doing Time: Crimmigration Law and the Perils of Haste. UCLA Law Review 58(6): 1705–1748.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg, Juanita. 2008. ‘Trash-talk’ and the Production of Quotidian Geopolitical Boundaries in the USA-Mexico Borderlands. Social & Cultural Geography 9(8): 871–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, Nigel. 2000. It’s the Little Things. In Geopolitical Traditions: A Century of Geopolitical Thought, eds. Klaus Dodds, and David Atkinson, 380–387. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ugelvik, Synnove, and Barbara Hudson. 2012. Justice and Security in the 21st Century: Risks, Rights and the Rule of Law. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vergara, Camilo J. 1995. The New American Ghetto. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, Loïc. 2000. The New ‘Peculiar Institution’: On the Prison as Surrogate Ghetto. Theoretical Criminology 4(3): 377–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. Deadly Symbiosis: When Ghetto and Prison Meet and Mesh. Punishment & Society: International Journal of Penology 3(1): 95–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. The Body, the Ghetto and the Penal State. Qualitative Sociology 32(1): 101–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, William. 2006. Border/Control. European Journal of Social Theory 9(2): 187–203.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Warschawski, Michel. 2005. On the Border. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, David, Roy Spina, and Joyce E. Canaan. 2011. In Praise of the Carceral Tour: Learning from the Grendon Experience. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 50(4): 343–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, Keith, and John Paul Jones. 2005. On the Border with Deleuze and Guattari. In B/Ordering Spaces, eds. Henk van Houtum, Olivier Kramsch, and Wolfgang Zierhofer, 235–248. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Randall. 2005. Going to Teach in Prisons: Culture Shock. Journal of Correctional Education 56(1): 19–38.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Turner, J. (2016). Conceptualising ‘Inside’ and ‘Outside’. In: The Prison Boundary. Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53242-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53242-8_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-53241-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-53242-8

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics