Abstract
This chapter presents a theoretical framework for the simultaneous analysis of the ‘scales’, ‘territories’ and ‘places’ of welfare states. The proposed theoretical framework can be applied for examining, in a comparative manner, the ways in which these three spatial dimensions intersect with one another in local welfare systems and aims at avoiding the one-dimensionalism that has been the pitfall of previous studies on the same topic. The chapter furthermore outlines a spatially sensitive periodisation of welfare state development, which focuses on the historical evolution of central–local government relationships in three subsequent stages of welfare state development.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Andreotti, A., & Mingione, E. (2014). Local welfare systems in Europe and the economic crisis. European Urban and Regional Studies, 1–15. doi: 10.1177/0969776414557191.
Andreotti, A., Mingione, E., & Pollizzi, E. (2012). Local welfare systems: A challenge for social cohesion. Urban Studies, 49(9), 1925–1940.
Bifulco, L. (2014). Citizenship and governance at a time of territorialization: The Italian local welfare between innovation and fragmentation. European Urban and Regional Studies, 1–16.
Brenner, N. (2000). The urban question as a scale question: Reflections on Henri Lefebvre, urban theory and the politics of scale. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(2), 361–378.
Brenner, N. (2001). The limits to scale? Methodological reflections on scalar structuration. Progress in Human Geography, 25(4), 591–614.
Brenner, N. (2004a). New state spaces. Urban governance and the rescaling of statehood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brenner, N. (2004b). Urban governance and the production of new state spaces in western Europe, 1960–2000. Review of International Political Economy, 11(3), 447–488.
Brenner, N. (2009). Open questions on state rescaling. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 2(1), 123–139.
Colombo, A. (2008). The Lombardy model: Subsidiarity-informed regional governance. Social Policy & Administration, 42(2), 177–196.
Dubois, H. F. W., & Fattore, G. (2009). Definitions and typologies in public administration research: The case of decentralization. International Journal of Public Administration, 32(8), 704–727.
Duncan, S. (1989). What is locality? In R. Peet & N. Thrift (Eds.), New models in geography (vol. 2, pp. 221–252). London: Unwin Hyman.
Ferrera, M. (2005). The boundaries of welfare: European integration and the new spatial politics of social protection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hadjimichalis, C. (2011). Uneven geographical development and socio-spatial justice and solidarity: European regions after the 2009 financial crisis. European Urban and Regional Studies, 18(3), 254–274.
Harvey, D. (1978). The urban process under capitalism: A framework for analysis. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2(1), 101–131.
Harvey, D. (1989). From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler, Series B, Human Geography, 71(1), 3–17.
Jessop, B. (2000). The crisis of the national spatio-temporal fix and the tendential ecological dominance of globalizing capitalism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(2), 323–360.
Jessop, B. (2002). The future of the capitalist state. Bristol: Polity Press.
Jessop, B. (2005). The political economy of scale and European governance. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 96(2), 225–230.
Jessop, B., & Sum, N. L. (2006). Beyond the regulation approach: Putting capitalist economies in their place. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Jessop, B., Brenner, N., & Jones, M. (2008). Theorizing sociospatial relations. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26, 389–401.
Karjalainen, V. (2010). Actors, scaling and governance in activation policy. In Y. Kazepov (Ed.), Rescaling social policies: Towards multilevel governance in Europe (pp. 139–174). Farnham: Ashgate.
Kazepov, Y. (2008). The subsidiarization of social policies: Actors, processes and impacts. Some reflections on the Italian case from a European perspective. European Societies, 10(2), 247–263.
Kazepov, Y. (Ed.) (2010). Rescaling social policies: Towards multilevel governance in Europe. Farnham: Ashgate.
Kazepov, Y., & Barberis, E. (2013). Social assistance governance in Europe: Towards a multilevel perspective. In I. Marx & K. Nelson (Eds.), Minimum income protection in flux (pp. 217–248). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Keating, M. (1997). The invention of regions: Political restructuring and territorial government in Western Europe. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 15(4), 383–398. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/environment-and-planning-c-government-and-policy/journal202438.
Keating, M. (2013). Rescaling the European state: The making of territory and the rise of the meso. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Massey, D. (1984). Spatial divisions of labour: Social structures and the geography of production. London: Macmillan.
Moreno, L., & McEwen, N. (2005). Exploring the territorial politics of welfare. In N. McEwen & L. Moreno (Eds.), The territorial politics of welfare. London: Routledge.
Peck, J., & Tickell, A. (1994). Searching for the new institutional fix: The after-Fordist crisis and the global-local disorder. In A. Amin (Ed.), Post-fordism: A reader (pp. 280–215). London: Blackwell.
Ranci, C., Brandsen, T., & Sabatinelli, S. (Eds.) (2014). Social vulnerability in European cities. The role of local welfare in times of crisis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Saraceno, C. (Ed.) (2002). Social assistance dynamics in Europe: National and local poverty regimes. Bristol: Policy Press.
Scarpa, S. (2009). The scalar dimension of welfare state development: The case of Swedish and Finnish social assistance systems. Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society, 2(1), 67–83.
Swyngedouw, E. (1997). Neither global nor local. “Glocalization” and the politics of scale. In K. Cox (Ed.), Spaces of globalization (pp. 137–166). New York: Guilford Press.
Thorkildsen, D. (1997). Religious identity and Nordic identity. In Ø. Sørensen & B. Stråth (Eds.), The cultural construction of Norden (pp. 138–160). Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
Toth, A. (1992). The principle of subsidiarity in the Maastricht treaty. Common Market Law Review, 29, 1079–1105.
Vampa, D. (2014). The sub-state politics of welfare in Italy: Assessing the effect of territorial mobilization on the development of region-specific social governance. Regional & Federal Studies, 24(4), 473–491.
Varoufakis, Y. (2011). The global minotaur: America, the true origins of the financial crisis and the future of the world economy. London: Zed Books.
Wollmann, H., & Thurmaier, K. (2012). Reforming local government institutions and the new public management in Europe and in the US. In K. Mossberger, S. Clarke, & P. John (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of urban politics (pp. 179–209). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Scarpa, S. (2016). The Local Welfare System as a Scale Question. In: Johansson, H., Panican, A. (eds) Combating Poverty in Local Welfare Systems. Work and Welfare in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53190-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53190-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-53189-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-53190-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)