Skip to main content

The Memory-Work Group: Feminist Belonging

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Becoming Feminist

Part of the book series: Citizenship, Gender and Diversity ((FEMCIT))

  • 387 Accesses

Abstract

Using the work of Nira Yuval-Davis, this chapter considers how four women who took part in a memory-work group negotiate a sense of feminist belonging across three sites. Firstly, two memories written by Alexandra illustrate how belonging is negotiated across social positionings. Alexandra was able to establish a sense of belonging on a SlutWalk march as a white middle-class woman. Secondly, the women’s discussion of arguing demonstrates how establishing belonging can secure a feminism that feels under threat. Finally, the women’s discussion of strategies they employ to ensure they are listened to exposes shifting boundaries of belonging. Across these sites, the ‘proper feminist’ is an illusionary figure that regulates feminist belonging. The women measure themselves against this figure, despite an awareness of exclusions she enacts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Thirty-four-year-old Nina and thirty-five-year-old Vicky, who both described themselves as white British middle class and straight. Twenty-nine-year-old Alexandra described herself as white middle class, and when asked to describe her sexuality, responded ‘in a long-term monogamous relationship with a cis hetero man but previously have had same-sex experiences/attractions—so I guess I pass as heterosexual but would not call myself 100% straight - ugh, complicated!’. Finally, 31-year-old Sam described her ethnicity, social class and sexuality as multi-heritage Indian-English, lower-middle class and bisexual.

  2. 2.

    Sam defined herself as multi-heritage Indian-English, lower-middle class and bisexual, whilst the other women defined themselves as white middle class and either straight or, for Alexandra, passing as heterosexual but not ‘100% straight’. The possibilities for heterogeneity both within and beyond these categories are, of course, in many ways limitless.

  3. 3.

    [ ] Indicates overlapping speech.

  4. 4.

    The phrase adopts the colloquial use of ‘101’ to refer to the most basic and introductory knowledge of a subject.

References

  • Black Women’s Blueprint. 2011/2015.An Open Letter from Black Women to the SlutWalk. Gender and Society 30(1): 9–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borah, Rituparna, and Subhalakshmi Nandi. 2012. Reclaiming the Feminist Politics of ‘SlutWalk’. International Feminist Journal of Politics 14(3): 415–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, Joetta L. 2013. The SlutWalk Movement: A Study in Transnational Feminist Activism. Journal of Feminist Scholarship 4: 24–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Patricia Hill. 2000. Gender, Black Feminism, and Black Political Economy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 568(1): 41–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, Kimberlé Williams. 1991. Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review 43(6): 1241–1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fay, Michaela. 2008. ‘Mobile Belonging’: Exploring Transnational Feminist Theory and Online Connectivity. In Tanu Priya Uteng and Tim Cresswell, ed. Gendered Mobilities, 65–82. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, Gabriele, and Rosi Braidotti. 2002. Thinking Differently: A Reader in European Women’s Studies. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, Donna. 1988. Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies 14(3): 575–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haug, Frigga, Sunne Andresen, Anke Bünz-Elferding, Kornelia Hauser, Ursel Lang, Marion Laudan, Magret Lüdemann, Ute Meir, Barbara Nemitz, Erika Niehoff, Renate Prinz, Nora Räthzel, Martina Scheu, and Christine Thomas. 1987. Female Sexualization: A Collective Work of Memory. London and New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesford, Victoria. 2005. Feminism and its Ghosts the Spectre of the Feminist-as-Lesbian. Feminist Theory 6(3): 227–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Feeling Women’s Liberation. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, Janell. 2011. Should Black Women Oppose the SlutWalk? Ms.Magazine blog. http://msmagazine.com/blog/2011/09/27/should-black-women-oppose-the-slutwalk/. Accessed 29 November 2015.

  • ———. 1984. Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center. Boston, MA: South End.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howie, Gillian. 2010. Feminist Histories: Conflict, Coalitions and the Maternal Order. Studies in the Maternal 2(1): 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaggar, Alison M. 1989. Love and Knowledge: Emotion in Feminist Epistemology. Inquiry 32(2): 151–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapur, Ratna. 2012. Pink Chaddis and SlutWalk Couture: The Postcolonial Politics of Feminism Lite. Feminist Legal Studies 20(1): 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, Jason, and Alexandra Fanghanel. 2013. ‘Hijabs, Hoodies and Hotpants’; Negotiating the ‘Slut’ in SlutWalk. Geoforum 48: 207–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorde, Audre. 1984. Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches. Berkeley: Crossing Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendes, Kaitlynn D. 2015. SlutWalk: Feminism, Activism and Media. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miriam, Kathy. 2012. Feminism, Neoliberalism, and SlutWalk. Feminist Studies 38(1): 262–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misztal, Barbara. 2003. Theories of Social Remembering. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, Durba. 2012. Critical Perspectives on SlutWalks in India. Feminist Studies. 38(1): 254–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, Benjamin, and Simon Tormey. 2014. Rethinking Populism: Politics, Mediatisation and Political Style. Political Studies 62(2): 381–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, Janet. 2013. But we Didn’t Mean that: Feminist Projects, Governmental Appropriations and Spaces of Politics. In Beyond Citizenship: Feminism and the Transformation of Belonging, ed. Sasha Roseneil, 89–111. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Probyn, Elspeth. 1996. Outside Belongings. London: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Repudiating Feminism: Young Women in a Neoliberal World. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013b. Reluctant Citizens: Between Incorporation and Resistance. In Beyond Citizenship: Feminism and the Transformation of Belonging, ed. Sasha Roseneil, 66–88. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiegman, Robyn. 2000. Feminism’s Apocalyptic Futures. New Literary History 31(4): 805–825.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuval-Davis, Nira. 2011. The Politics of Belonging: Intersectional Contestations. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, Nira. 2006. Intersectionality and Feminist Politics. European Journal of Women’s Studies 13(3): 193–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Guest, C. (2016). The Memory-Work Group: Feminist Belonging. In: Becoming Feminist. Citizenship, Gender and Diversity. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53181-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53181-0_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-53180-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-53181-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics