Abstract
A newcomer in the human-technology interaction (HTI) field encounters a complex variety of interest groups and design discourses. Over the years, human interaction with artefacts has been studied from many different approaches, perspectives, concepts, and methodologies. Yet conceptual structuring of the field is much needed; traditional metascientific concepts such as paradigm, research programme, and discourse can help.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
This type of engineering uses semantic differential-based methods to investigate people’s preferences for various products.
References
Abras, C., Maloney-Krichmar, D., & Preece, J. (2004). User-centered design. In W. S. Bainbridge (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human-computer interaction (pp. 445–456). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Alexander, C. (1977). A pattern language: Towns, buildings, construction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Anderson, J. R., Farrell, R., & Sauers, R. (1984). Learning to program Lisp. Cognitive Science, 8, 87–129.
Annett, J. (2000). Theoretical and pragmatic influences on task analysis methods. In J. Schraagen, S. Chipman, & V. Shalin (Eds.), Cognitive task analysis (pp. 25–40). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Annett, J. (2004). Hierarchical task analysis. In D. Diaper & N. Stanton (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive task design (pp. 63–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Annett, J., & Duncan, K. D. (1967). Task analysis and training design. Report resumes. Hull: Hull University.
Aykin, N., Quaet-Faslem, P., & Milewski, A. (2006). Cultural ergonomics. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of human factors and ergonomics (pp. 3–31). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barbour, I. (1980). Paradigms in science and religion. In G. Gutting (Ed.), Paradigms and revolutions: Appraisals and applications of Thomas Kuhn’s philosophy of science (pp. 223–245). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Behrent, M. C. (2013). Foucault and technology. History and Technology, 29, 54–104.
Booch, G., Rumbauch, J., & Jacobson, I. (1999). The unified modelling language. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Bouma, H., Fozard, J. L., & van Bronswijk, J. E. M. H. (2009). Gerontechnology as a field of endeavour. Gerontechnology, 8, 68–75.
Bowen, W. R. (2009). Engineering ethics: Outline of an aspirational approach. London: Springer.
Bridger, R. S. (2009). Introduction to ergonomics. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Broadbent, D. (1958). Perception and communication. London: Pergamon Press.
Budd, T. (1991). Object-oriented programming. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Card, S., Moran, T., & Newell, A. (1983). The psychology of human-computer interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Carroll, J. M. (Ed.). (2003). HCI models, theories, and frameworks: Toward a multidisciplinary science. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Charness, N. (2009). Ergonomics and aging: The role of interactions. In I. Graafmans, V. Taipale, & N. Charness (Eds.), Gerontechnology: Sustainable investment in future (pp. 62–73). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Chikofsky, E. J., & Cross, J. H. (1990). Reverse engineering and design recovery: A taxonomy. Software, IEEE, 7, 13–17.
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mounton.
Ciavola, B., Ning, Y., & Gershenson, J. K. (2010). Empathic design for early-stage problem identification. In American Society of Mechanical Engineers 2010 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (pp. 267–276).
Cockton, G. (1987). Interaction ergonomics, control and separation: Open problems in user interface management. Information and Software Technology, 29, 176–191.
Cockton, G. (2004). Value-centred HCI. In Proceedings of the Third Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 149–160).
Coursaris, C. K., & Bontis, N. (2012). A metareview of HCI literature: Citation impact and research productivity rankings. In SIGHCI 2012 Proceedings Paper 9.
Covan, N. (2000). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 24, 87–185.
Cross, N. (1982). Designerly ways of knowing. Design Studies, 3, 221–227.
Cross, N. (2001). Designerly ways of knowing: Design discipline versus design science. Design Issues, 17, 49–55.
Cross, N. (2004). Expertise in design: An overview. Design Studies, 2, 427–441.
Czaja, S. J., & Nair, S. N. (2006). Human factors engineering and systems design. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of human factors and ergonomics (pp. 32–49). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Deacon, T. (1997). The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the human brain. London: Penguin Press.
Desmet, P., Overbeeke, K., & Tax, S. (2001). Designing products with added emotional value: Development and application of an approach for research through design. The Design Journal, 4, 32–47.
Di Stasi, L. L., Antolí, A., & Cañas, J. J. (2013). Evaluating mental workload while interacting with computer-generated artificial environments. Entertainment Computing, 4, 63–69.
Dijkstra, E. (1972). Notes on structured programming. In O. Dahl, E. Dijkstra, & C. Hoare (Eds.), Structured programming. London: Academic Press.
Dix, A., Findlay, J., Abowd, G., & Beale, R. (1993). Human-computer interaction. New York: Prentice-Hall.
Dym, C. L., & Brown, D. C. (2012). Engineering design: Representation and reasoning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Elmasri, R., & Navathe, S. (2011). Database systems. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
Feyerabend, P. (1975). Against method. London: Verso.
Forlizzi, J., & Battarbee, K. (2004). Understanding experience in interactive systems. In Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Process, Practices, Methods, and Techniques (DIS 2004) (pp. 261–268).
Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. New York: Pantheon Books.
Galiz, W. O. (2002). The essential guide to user interface design. New York: Wiley.
Gopher, D., & Donchin, E. (1986). Workload: An examination of the concept. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance: Cognitive processes and performance (pp. 1–46). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Habermas, J. (1973). Erkentniss und interesse [Knowledge and interests]. Frankfurth am Main: Surkamp.
Habermas, J. (1981). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns [Theory of communicative behavior] (Vols. 1–2). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Hanson, N. R. (1958). Patterns of discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hassenzahl, M. (2011). Experience design. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool.
Hassenzahl, M., & Tractinsky, N. (2006). User experience—A research agenda. Behaviour and Information Technology, 25, 91–97.
Helander, M., & Khalid, H. M. (2006). Affective and pleasurable design. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of human factors and ergonomics (pp. 543–572). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Hobbes, T. (1651/1950). Leviathan. New York: EP Dutton.
International Organization for Standardization. (1998). ISO 9241-11: Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals (VDTs): Part 11: Guidance on Usability.
Jordan, P. W. (2000). Designing pleasurable products: An introduction to the new human factors. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Kaptelinin, V. (1996). Activity theory: Implications for human-computer interaction. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 103–116). Cambridge, MA: MIT-Press.
Karwowski, W. (2006). The discipline of ergonomics and human factors. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of human factors and ergonomics (pp. 3–31). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Kieras, D. E., & Meyer, D. E. (1997). An overview of the EPIC architecture for cognition and performance with application to human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 12, 391–438.
Koivisto, K. (2011). Kaj Frank and the art of glass. In H. Matiskainen (Ed.), The art of glass—Kaj Frank 100 years (pp. 8–61). Saarijärvi: Design museo.
Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kuniavsky, M. (2003). Observing the user experience: A practitioner’s guide to user research. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Kuutti, K. (1996). Activity theory as a potential framework for human–computer interaction research. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human–computer interaction (pp. 17–44). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lakatos, I. M. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of research programmes. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Laudan, L. (1977). Progress and its problems: Towards a theory of scientific growth. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Leikas, J. (2009). Life-based design—A holistic approach to designing human-technology interaction. Helsinki: Edita Prima Oy.
Leonard, D., & Rayport, J. F. (1997). Spark innovation through empathic design. Harvard Business Review, 75, 102–115.
Lewis, M., & Jacobson, J. (2002). Game engines. Communications of the ACM, 45, 27–31.
Mao, J., Vredenburg, K., Smith, P. W., & Carey, T. (2005). The state of user-centered design practice. Communications of the ACM, 4, 105–109.
Mattelmäki, T., & Battarbee, K. (2002). Empathy probes. In: T. Binder, J. Gregory and I. Wagner (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Biennial Participatory Design Conference 2002, June 23 - June 25, 2002, Malmø, Sweden. (pp. 266–271).
Markopoulos, P., & Bekker, M. (2003). Interaction design and children. Interacting with Computers, 15, 141–149.
Marti, P., & Bannon, L. J. (2009). Exploring user-centred design in practice: Some caveats. Knowledge, Technology and Policy, 22, 7–15.
McCarthy, J., & Wright, P. (2004). Technology as experience. Interactions, 11, 42–43.
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.
Monk, A. F. (2002) Fun, communication and dependability: Extending the concept of usability. In Faulkner, X, Finlay, J, and Detienne, F. (Eds)16th British-Human-Computer-Interact-Group Annual Conference/European-Usability-Professionals-Association London, England Sept. 02-06, 2002, p. 3–14.
Nagamashi, M. (2011). Kansei/affective engineering and history of Kansei/ affective engineering in the world. In M. Nagamashi (Ed.), Kansei/affective engineering (pp. 1–30). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Nardi, B. A. (1996). Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability engineering. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Nielsen, J., & Norman, D. (2014). Definition of user experience. Retrieved January 24, 2015, from http://www.nngroup.com/articles/definition-user-experience/
Niezen, G. (2012). Ontologies for interaction. Eindhoven: Eindhoven University Press.
Norman, D. (2004). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
Norman, D. A., & Draper, S. W. (Eds.). (1986). User centered system design; New perspectives on human-computer interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Norman, D., Miller, J., & Henderson, A. (1995). What you see, some of what’s in the future, and how we go about doing it: HI at Apple Computer. In Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems (p. 155). ACM.
Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.
Preece, J., Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., Benyon, D., Holland, S., & Carey, T. (1994). Human-computer interaction. Harlow: Addison-Wesley.
Preece, J., Rogers, Y., & Sharp, H. (2004). Interaction design. New York: Wiley.
Rauterberg, M. (2004). Positive effects of entertainment technology on human behaviour. In: R. Jacquart (Ed): Building the Information Society (pp. 51-58). Kluwer Academic press.
Rauterberg, M. (2006). HCI as an engineering discipline: To be or not to be? African Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 2, 163–183.
Rauterberg M. (2010). Emotions: The voice of the unconscious. In: H.S. Yang, R. Malaka, J. Hoshino, J.H. Han (eds.) Entertainment Computing - ICEC 2010 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6243, pp. 205–215), (c) IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, Heidelberg: Springer.
Ross, A., & Chiasson, M. (2011). Habermas and information systems research: New directions. Information and Organization, 2, 123–141.
Saariluoma, P. (1984). Coding problem spaces in chess. In Commentationes Scientiarum Socialium (Vol. 23). Turku: Societas Scientiarum Fennica.
Saariluoma, P. (1997). Foundational analysis: Presuppositions in experimental psychology. London: Routledge.
Saariluoma, P. (2005). Explanatory frameworks for interaction design. In A. Pirhonen, H. Isomäki, C. Roast, & P. Saariluoma (Eds.), Future interaction design (pp. 67–83). London: Springer.
Saariluoma, P., & Jokinen, J. P. (2014). Emotional dimensions of user experience: A user psychological analysis. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 30, 303–320.
Saariluoma, P., & Oulasvirta, A. (2010). User psychology: Re-assessing the boundaries of a discipline. Psychology, 1, 317–328.
Saarinen, E., & Saarinen, A. B. (1962). Eero Saarinen on his work. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (2011). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology—An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14.
Shneiderman, B., & Maes, P. (1997). Direct manipulation vs. interface agents. Interactions, 4, 42–61.
Shneiderman, B., & Plaisant, C. (2005). Designing user interfaces. Boston, MA: Pearson.
Sikka, T. (2011). Technology, communication, and society: From Heidegger and Habermas to Feenberg. The Review of Communication, 11, 93–106.
Simon, H. A. (1969). The sciences of artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Stahl, B. C. (2006). Emancipation in cross-cultural IS research: The fine line between relativism and dictatorship of intellectual. Ethics and Information Technology, 8, 97–108.
Stahl, B. C. (2010). 6. Social issues in computer ethics. In L. Floridi (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of information and computer ethics (pp. 101–115). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Trist, E. L. (1978). On socio-technical systems. Sociotechnical systems: A sourcebook. San Diego, CA: University Associates.
Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K., Väätäjä, H., & Vainio, T. (2009). Opportunities and challenges of designing the service user eXperience (SUX) in web 2.0. In P. Saariluoma & H. Isomäki (Eds.), Future interaction design II (pp. 117–139). Berlin: Springer.
van Schomberg, R. (2013). A vision of responsible research and innovation. In R. Owen, M. Heintz, & J. Bessant (Eds.), Responsible innovation (pp. 51–74). Oxford: Wiley.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1980). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Weinberg, G. M. (1971). The psychology of computer programming. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Whitford, F., & Ter-Sarkissian, C. (1984). Bauhaus. London: Thames and Hudson.
Wickens, C., & Holands, J. G. (2000). Engineering psychology and human performance. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Saariluoma, P., Cañas, J.J., Leikas, J. (2016). Design Discourses. In: Designing for Life. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53047-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53047-9_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-53046-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-53047-9
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)