Skip to main content

Social Media, New Technologies and History Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter explores the implications of recent developments in technology and social media, having a significant impact on the way in which young people learn history in schools and outside schools. New technology not only has a positive influence on education but also has unintended negative consequences. Positioning the increasing influence of the internet and social media in history education in a broader discourse about new technology and education, Haydn and Ribbens pay attention to the potentially harmful effects on history education. Furthermore, they focus on the attributes that are helpful to history teachers and students while reflecting on ways in which well-informed use of social media helps to obviate negative consequences of ‘bad’ history.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, T. (2015, April 19). Britain Uncovered. The Observer Review, 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, R. (2004). Towards Dialogic Teaching: Rethinking Classroom Talk. York: Diagolos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, J., & Miller, C. (2011). Truth, Lies and the Internet: A Report into Young People’s Digital Fluency. London: Demos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnet, M. (1997). Computers in the Classroom: Some Values Issues. In A. McFarlane (Ed.), Information Technology and Authentic Learning: Realising the Potential of Computers in the Primary Classroom (pp. 145–159). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannadine, D. (2013). The Undivided Past: History Beyond Our Differences. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, J., & Krutka, D. (2014). How and Why Educators Use Twitter: A Survey of the Field. Journal of Research on Technology in Education., 46(4), 414–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cash, B. (2014). Quoted in Boffey, D. (2014, March 23). Tory MPs Block EU Funding for First World War Centenary Events. The Observer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centre for Educational Research and Innovation. (2010). ICT in Initial Teacher Training. Retrieved May 12, 2015, from www.oecd.org/edu/ceri/ceri-ictandinitialteachertraining.htm

  • Churchwell, S. (2011). The Wilful Ignorance Which Has Dragged the US to the Brink. Ziggurat, Autumn, 4–5. Norwich: University of East Anglia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. (2014, January 16). Is History Telling Us Something? The Guardian, 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, P. (1995, June 23). Desperate Race to Keep Up with Children. Times Educational Supplement, 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (2013, September 29). Not So Dumb After All. Sunday Times: Culture, 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, M., Ercikan, K., Friesen, G., Letourneau, J., Muise, D., Northrup, D., et al. (2013). Canadians and Their Pasts. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Convery, A. (2009). The Pedagogy of the Impressed: How Teachers Become Victims of Technological Vision. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(1), 25–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe. (2001). Recommendations of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on History Teaching in Twenty-First Century Europe. Retrieved May 18, 2015, from https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?id=234237

  • Counsell, C. (1997). Analytic and Discursive Writing at Key Stage 3. London: Historical Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crook, C. (2012). The ‘Digital Native’ in Context: Tensions Associated with Importing Web 2.0 Practices into the School Setting. Oxford Review of Education, 38(1), 63–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dron, J. (2015). A Learner’s Guide to Nurturing Wise Crowds and Taming Stupid Mobs. Keynote Address, Edmedia Conference, Montreal, 22–24 June. Retrieved May 27, 2015, from www.aace.org/conf/edmedia/speakers/2015/dron.htm

  • Education Technology Action Group. (2015). Education Technology Action Group: Our Reflections. Retrieved May 12, 2015, from http://etag.report

  • Ertmer, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2010). Teacher Technology Change: How Knowledge, Confidence, Beliefs and Culture Intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, R. (2011). The Wonderfulness of Us. London Review of Books, 33(6), 9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (1999). Change Forces: The Sequel. London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haydn, T. (2004). The Use of ICT in History Teaching in England and Wales 1970–2003. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haydn, T. (2013). What Does It Mean “To Be Good at ICT” as a History Teacher? In T. Haydn (Ed.), Using New Technologies to Enhance Teaching and Learning in History (pp. 6–28). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haydn, T. (2014). How Do You Get Pre-service Teachers to Become ‘Good at ICT’ in Their Subject Teaching? The Views of Expert Practitioners. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 23(4), 455–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawn, E. (2002, September 22). Man of the Extreme Century. The Observer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawn, E. (2008, January 15). In Defence of History. The Guardian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, K. (1991). Rethinking History. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, K. (1984). Why Teach History in School? The Historian, No. 2, 10–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawlor, S. (1989). Proposals for the National Curriculum in History: A Report. London: Centre for Policy Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, P., & Ashby, R. (2000). Progression in Historical Understanding Among Students Ages 7–14. In P. N. Stearns, P. Seixas, & S. Wineburg (Eds.), Knowing, Teaching and Learning History. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, P., & Shemilt, D. (2004). A Scaffold, Not a Cage: Progression and Progression Models in History. Teaching History, 113, 13–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logevall, F., & Osgood, K. (2010). The Ghost of Munich: America’s Appeasement Complex. World Affairs. Retrieved May 18, 2015, from www.worldaffairsjournal.org/article/ghost-munich-americas-appeasement-complex

  • Longworth, N. (1981, June). We’re Moving into the Information Society—What Shall We Teach the Children? Computer Education, 17–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenthal, D. (2007). The Past of the Future: From the Foreign to the Undiscovered Country. In K. Jenkins, S. Morgan, & A. Munslow (Eds.), Manifestos for History (pp. 205–219). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luckin, R., Bligh, B., Manches, A., Ainsworth, S., Crook, C., & Noss, R. (2012). Decoding Learning: The Proof, Promise and Potential of Digital Education. London: NESTA.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacMillan, M. (2009). The Uses and Abuses of History. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacMillan, M. (2014, January 11). History in All Its Complexity. The Guardian, 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Male, T., & Burden, K. (2014). Access Denied? Twenty-first-century Technology in Schools. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 23(4), 423–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maner, M. (2000). The Research Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N. (2000). Words and Minds: How We Use Language to Think Together. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morozov, E. (2013). To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naughton, J. (1998, March 22). The Observer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naughton, J. (2012). From Gutenberg to Zuckerberg: What You Really Need to Know About the Internet. London: Phoenix.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss, R., & Pachler, N. (1999). The Challenge of New Technologies: Doing Old Things in a New Way or Doing New Things? In P. Mortimore (Ed.), Understanding Pedagogy and Its Impact on Learning (pp. 195–211). London: Paul Chapman.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ofcom. (2013). Children and Parents: Media Use and Attitudes. London: Ofcom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofsted. (2006). Annual Report of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector for Schools. London: Ofsted.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, R. (1967). The Concept of Education. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomerantsev, P. (2015, April 9). Inside the Kremlin’s Hall of Mirrors. The Guardian. Retrieved May 18, 2015, from www.theguardian.com/news/2015/apr/09/kremlin-hall-of-mirrors-military-information-psychology

  • Postman, N. (1993). Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon 9(5). Retrieved from www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Digital%20Natives,%20Digital%20Immigrants%20-%20Part1.pdf

  • Richardson, W. (2006). Blogs, Wikis, Podcasts and Other Powerful Webtools for Classrooms. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollett, S. (2010). ‘Hi George. Let Me Ask My Leading Historians…’, Deconstructing Lazy Analogies in Year 9. Teaching History, 139, 24–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosling, H. (2010). The Joy of Stats. Retrieved March 12, 2015, from http://www.gapminder.org/videos/the-joy-of-stats

  • Rousseau, R. (2012, November 9). Ahmadinejad, Hitler, Saddam and the Appeasement Analogy. Diplomatic Courier. Retrieved May 18, 2015, from www.diplomaticourier.com/news/topics/security/1239-ahmadinejad-hitler-saddam-and-the-appeasement-analogy-a-knockout-argument

  • Sadler, P. (1994, September 19). Simple Minds: QED. BBC 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seixas, P. (1993). The Community of Practice as a Basis for Knowledge and Learning: The Case of History. American Educational Research Journal, 30(2), 305–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (2002). Learning to Love the Micro: The Discursive Construction of ‘Educational’ Computing in the UK, 1979–1989. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(3), 417–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (2012, February 1). Social Media, Social Learning? Considering the Limits of the ‘Social Turn’ in Contemporary Educational Technology. Keynote address at the Third European Conference on Information technology in Education and Society, University of Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shearlaw, M. (2015, April 3). Who’s Trolling Who? The Guardian, 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simkin, J. (2013, November 28). Lecture at Sidney Sussex College, University of Cambridge. The Past, Present and Future of eHistory. (Email correspondence with the author, 29 November 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater, J. (1989). The Politics of History Teaching: A Humanity Dehumanised? London: Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standage, T. (2013). Writing on the Wall: Social Media, the First 2,000 Years. New York: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanford, M. (1986). The Nature of Historical Knowledge. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenhouse, L. (1975). An Introduction to Curriculum Research and Development. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. (2013). Smarter Than You Think: How Technology Is Changing Our Minds for the Better. London: Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tosh, J. (2008). Why History Matters. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Education. (2004). National Education Technology Plan 2004: Toward a New Golden Age in American Education. US Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, B. (2003). Building Learning Packages: Integrating Virtual Resources with the Real World of Teaching and Learning. In T. Haydn & C. Counsell (Eds.), History, ICT and Learning (pp. 109–133). London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, B. (2008). Stories and Sources: The Need for Historical Thinking in an Information Age. Teaching History, 133, 4–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willingham, D. (2009). Why Don’t Students Like School? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wineburg, S. (1997). Beyond ‘Breadth and Depth’: Subject Matter Knowledge and Assessment. Theory into Practice, 36(4), 255–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wineburg, S. (2001). Historical Thinking and Other Unnatural Acts. Philadelphia: Temple.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolgar, S. (2002). Virtual Society? Technology, Cyperbole, Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Haydn, T., Ribbens, K. (2017). Social Media, New Technologies and History Education. In: Carretero, M., Berger, S., Grever, M. (eds) Palgrave Handbook of Research in Historical Culture and Education. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52908-4_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52908-4_38

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-52907-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-52908-4

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics