Skip to main content

Historical Reading and Writing in Secondary School Classrooms

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Palgrave Handbook of Research in Historical Culture and Education

Abstract

Little of the reading and writing that takes place within traditional secondary school history classrooms mirrors the literate processes of historians. However, Nokes argues in this chapter, historical literacies, such as a consideration of sources and the cross checking of information, are vital for twenty-first century readers. Teachers help students develop historical literacies by exposing them to the texts historians use, to historians’ thinking strategies, and by requiring students to read and write to construct and defend interpretations like historians do. In reconceptualized history classrooms, teachers consider students’ epistemic stance and introduce them into a discourse community of student-historians. Although much research remains to be conducted on the impacts of historical literacy instruction on students’ development, current research supports this important trend in secondary history classrooms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ashby, R. A., Lee, P. J., & Shemilt, D. (2005). Putting Principles into Practice: Teaching and Planning. In M. S. Donovan & J. D. Bransford (Eds.), How Students Learn: History, Mathematics, and Science in the Classroom (pp. 79–178). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bain, R. B. (2005). “They Thought the World Was Flat?” Applying the Principles of How People Learn in Teaching High School History. In M. S. Donovan & J. D. Bransford (Eds.), How Students Learn: History, Mathematics, and Science in the Classroom (pp. 179–213). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, C. (2012). Understanding Historical Thinking at Historic Sites. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 833–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, K. C., & Levstick, L. S. (2004). Teaching History for the Common Good. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, J. C., & McCollum, D. F. (1917). A Study of the Attainments of Pupils in United States History. Journal of Educational Psychology, 8(5), 257–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouck, E. C., Englert, C. S., Heutsche, A., & Okolo, C. M. (2008). Cognitive Apprenticeship into the Discipline: Helping Students with Disabilities Think and Act Like Historians. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 6(2), 21–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braaksma, M., Van Drie, J., & Van Boxtel, C. (2015). Writing in History: Effects of Writing Instruction on Historical Reasoning and Text Quality. Journal of Writing Research, 7(1), 123–156. doi:10.17239/jowr-2015.07.01.06.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britt, M. A., Perfetti, C. A., Van Dyke, J., & Gabrys, G. (2000). The Sourcer’s Apprentice: A Tool for Document-Supported History Instruction. In P. Stearns, P. Siexas, & S. Wineburg (Eds.), Knowing, Teaching, and Learning in History: National and International Perspectives (pp. 437–470). New York: NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britt, M. A., Rouet, J. F., Georgi, M. C., & Perfetti, C. A. (1994). Learning from History Texts: From Causal Analysis to Argument Models. In G. Leinhardt, I. L. Beck, & C. Stainton (Eds.), Teaching and Learning in History (pp. 47–84). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collingwood, R. G. (1993). The Idea of History. Oxford: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (Eds.). (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, O. L., Yeager, E. A., & Foster, S. J. (Eds.). (2001). Historical Empathy and Perspective Taking in the Social Studies (pp. 21–50). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • De La Paz, S. (2005). Effects of Historical Reasoning Instruction and Writing Strategy Mastery in Culturally and Academically Diverse Middle School Classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 139–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De La Paz, S., & Felton, M. (2010). Reading and Writing from Multiple Sources in History: Effects of Strategy Instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 174–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De La Paz, S., Ferretti, R., Wissinger, D., Yee, L., & MacArthur, C. (2012). Adolescents’ Disciplinary Use of Evidence, Argumentative Strategies, and Organizational Structure in Writing about Historical Controversies. Written Communication, 29(4), 412–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Draper, R. J., Broomhead, P., Jensen, A. P., Nokes, J. D., & Siebert, D. (Eds.). (2010). (Re)imagining Content-Area Literacy Instruction. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ercikan, K., & Seixas, P. (Eds.). (2015). New Directions in Assessing Historical Thinking. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, S. J., Hoge, J. D., & Rosch, R. H. (1999). Thinking Aloud About History: Children’s and Adolescents’ Responses to Historical Photographs. Theory and Research in Social Education, 27(2), 178–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, S. J., & Yeager, E. A. (1999). “You’ve Got to Put Together the Pieces”: English 12-Year-Olds Encounter and Learn from Historical Evidence. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 14(4), 286. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/196371949?accountid=4488

  • Gaddis, J. L. (2002). The Landscape of History: How Historians Map the Past. Oxford: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (1989). Literacy, Discourse, and Linguistics: Introduction. The Journal of Education, 171(1), 5–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, S. (1993). The Role of Task in the Development of Academic Thinking Through Reading and Writing in a College History Course. Research in the Teaching of English, 27(1), 46–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. (2000). Design and Transformation: New Theories of Meaning. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures (pp. 153–161). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, P. J. (2005). Putting Principles into Practice: Understanding History. In M. S. Donovan & J. D. Bransford (Eds.), How Students Learn: History, Mathematics, and Science in the Classroom (pp. 31–77). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, P., & Ashby, R. (2001). Empathy, Perspective Taking, and Rational Understanding. In O. L. Davis, E. A. Yeager, & S. J. Foster (Eds.), Historical Empathy and Perspective Taking in the Social Studies (pp. 21–50). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levstik, L. S. (2001). Crossing the Empty Spaces: Perspective Taking in New Zealand Adolescents’ Understanding of National History. In O. L. Davis Jr., E. A. Yeager, & S. J. Foster (Eds.), Historical Empathy and Perspective Taking in the Social Studies (pp. 69–98). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levstik, L. S., & Barton, K. C. (2015). Doing History: Investigating with Children in Elementary and Middle Schools. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, A. S., Paxton, R. J., & Meyerson, P. (2006). “The Reality of It All”: History Students Read the Movies. Theory and Research in Social Education, 34(4), 516–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moje, E. B. (2008). Foregrounding the Disciplines in Secondary Literacy Teaching and Learning: A Call for Change. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 52, 96–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monte-Sano, C. (2008). Qualities of Historical Writing Instruction: A Comparative Case Study of Two Teachers’ Practices. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 1045–1079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monte-Sano, C. (2010). Disciplinary Literacy in History: An Exploration of the Historical Nature of Adolescents’ Writing. Journal of Learning Sciences, 19(4), 539–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nokes, J. D. (2011). Recognizing and Addressing Barriers to Adolescents’ “Reading Like Historians”. The History Teacher, 44(3), 379–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nokes, J. D. (2014). Elementary Students’ Roles and Epistemic Stances During Document-Based History Lessons. Theory and Research in Social Education, 42(3), 375–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nokes, J. D., Dole, J. A., & Hacker, D. J. (2007). Teaching High School Students to Use Heuristics While Reading Historical Texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 492–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paxton, R. J. (1997). “Someone With Like a Life Wrote It”: The Effects of a Visible Author on High School History Students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 235–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reisman, A. (2012). Reading Like a Historian: A Document-Based History Curriculum Intervention in Urban High Schools. Cognition and Instruction, 30(1), 86–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romano, A. (2011). How Dumb Are We? Newsweek, 157(13/14), 56–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, R. (2000). How Americans Use and Think About the Past: Implications from a National Survey for the Teaching of History. In P. Stearns, P. Seixas, & S. Wineburg (Eds.), Knowing, Teaching, and Learning History: National and International Perspectives (pp. 262–283). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, R., & Thelen, D. P. (1998). The Presence of the Past: Popular Uses of History in American Life (Vol. 2). Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1987). Knowledge Telling and Knowledge Transforming in Written Composition. Advances in Psycholinguistics, 2, 142–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seixas, P. (1993). Popular Film and Young People’s Understanding of the History of Native American-White Relations. The History Teacher, 26, 351–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seixas, P., Gibson, L., & Ercikan, K. (2015). A Design Process for Assessing Historical Thinking: The Case of a One-Hour Test. In K. Ercikan & P. Seixas (Eds.), New Directions in Assessing Historical Thinking (pp. 233–245). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seixas, P., & Morton, T. (2013). The Big Six Historical Thinking Concepts. Toronto: Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2008). Teaching Disciplinary Literacy to Adolescents: Rethinking Content-Area Literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 40–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M., & Breakstone, J. (2015). History Assessments of Thinking: An Investigation in Cognitive Validity. In K. Ercikan & P. Seixas (Eds.), New Directions in Assessing Historical Thinking (pp. 233–245). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Drie, J., & Van Boxtel, C. (2008). Historical Reasoning: Towards a Framework for Analyzing Students’ Reasoning About the Past. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 87–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanSledright, B. (2002). In Search of America’s Past: Learning to Read History in Elementary School. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanSledright, B. (2014). Assessing Historical Thinking and Understanding: Innovative Designs for New Standards. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, J., & Voss, J. F. (1996). The Effects of ‘Playing Historian’ on Learning in History. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 63–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, J., & Voss, J. F. (1999). Constructing Arguments from Multiple Sources: Tasks That Promote Understanding and Not Just Memory for Text. Journal of Educational Research, 91, 301–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wineburg, S. (1991). On the Reading of Historical Texts: Notes on the Breach Between School and Academy. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 495–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wineburg, S. (1994). The Cognitive Representation of Historical Texts. In G. Leinhardt, I. Beck, & C. Stainton (Eds.), Teaching and Learning in History (pp. 85–135). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wineburg, S. (1998). Reading Abraham Lincoln: An Expert/Expert Study in the Interpretation of Historical Texts. Cognitive Science, 22, 319–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wineburg, S. (2001). Historical Thinking and Other Unnatural Acts: Charting the Future of Teaching the Past. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wineburg, S. (2007). Forrest Gump and the Future of Teaching the Past. Phi Delta Kappan, 89(3), 168–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, K. M., & Leinhardt, G. (1998). Writing from Primary Documents. Written Communication, 15, 25–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nokes, J.D. (2017). Historical Reading and Writing in Secondary School Classrooms. In: Carretero, M., Berger, S., Grever, M. (eds) Palgrave Handbook of Research in Historical Culture and Education. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52908-4_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52908-4_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-52907-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-52908-4

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics