Skip to main content

Organizing the Past: Historical Accounts, Significance and Unknown Ontologies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Palgrave Handbook of Research in Historical Culture and Education

Abstract

The importance of accounts in history is paramount because histories only exist in the present in the form of accounts of the past in written and in other media. In their chapter Cercadillo, Chapman and Lee focus on students’ understandings of historical narratives and representations per se rather than on the establishment of particular facts or explanations about the past. The authors review what is known about students’ understandings of accounts, and of the related second-order concept historical significance, explaining different empirically based models of progression in historical thinking. Moreover, they offer some novel lines for research in relation to the relevance of cognitive ethics and epistemic dispositions in history education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Afandi, S. (2009, June). Singapore Students’ Conceptions on the Nature of Historical Accounts: Exploring Students’ Ideas and Teachers’ Assumptions About Student Understandings. Paper presented at the History Education Special Interest Group Meeting, Institute of Education, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Afandi, S.M. (2012). Conceptions About the Nature of Accounts in History: An Exploratory Study of Students’ Ideas and Teachers’ Assumptions About Students’ Understandings in Singapore. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Institute of Education, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, R. (2005). Students’ Approaches to Validating Historical Claims. In R. Ashby, P. J. Lee, & P. Gordon (Eds.), Understanding History: Recent Research in History Education (pp. 20–33). London: Routledge Falmer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, R., & Lee, P. J. (1987). Children’s Concepts of Empathy and Understanding in History. In C. Portal (Ed.), The History Curriculum for Teachers (pp. 62–88). London, UK: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barca, I. (1996). Adolescent Students’ Ideas About Provisional Historical Explanation. PhD thesis. London, UK: Institute of Education, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barca, I. (2001). Prospective Teachers’ Ideas About Assessing Different Accounts. International Journal of Historical Learning, Teaching and Research, 1(2). [Online]. Retrieved August 14, 2009, from http://centres.exeter.ac.uk/historyresource/journal2/barca.pdf

  • Barca, I. (2002). Direct Observation and History: The Ideas of Portuguese Students and Prospective Teachers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, 1–5 April 2002. [Online]. Retrieved August 12, 2008, from http://www.cshc.ubc.ca/viewpaper.php?id=89

  • Barca, I. (2005). “Till New Facts Are Discovered”: Students’ Ideas About Objectivity in History. In R. Ashby, P. Gordon, & P. J. Lee (Eds.), Understanding History: Recent Research in History Education. International Review of History Education (Vol. 4, pp. 62–76). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, K. (1996). Narrative Simplifications in Elementary Students’ Historical Thinking. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in Research on Teaching, Teaching and Learning History (Vol. 6, pp. 51–83). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, K., & McCully, A. (2005). History, Identity, and the School Curriculum in Northern Ireland: An Empirical Study of Secondary Students’ Ideas and Perspectives. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(1), 85–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blow, F., Rogers, R., Shemilt, D., & Smith, C. (2015). Only Connect: How Students Form Connections Within and Between Historical Narratives. In A. Chapman & A. Wilschut (Eds.), Joined Up History: New Directions in History Education Research. International Review of History Education (Vol. 8, pp. 279–315). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boix Mansilla, V. (2005). Between Reproducing and Organizing the Past: Students’ Beliefs About the Standards of acceptability of Historical History. In R. Ashby, P. Gordon, & P. J. Lee (Eds.), Understanding History: Recent Research in History Education. International Review of History Education (Vol. 4, pp. 91–106). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, E. H. (1961). What Is History? Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carretero, M. (2011). Constructing Patriotism. Teaching History and Memories in Global Worlds. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carretero, M., Jacott, L., Limón, M., López–Manjón, A., & León, J. A. (1994). Historical Knowledge: Cognitive and Instructional Implications. In M. Carretero & J. Voss (Eds.), Cognitive and Instructional Processes in History and the Social Sciences (pp. 357–376). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carretero, M., López–Manjón, A., & Jacott, L. (1997). Explaining Historical Events. International Journal of Educational Research, 27(3), 245–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cercadillo, L. (2001). Significance in History, Students’ Ideas in England and Spain. In A. K. Dickinson, P. Gordon, & P. J. Lee (Eds.), Raising Standards in History Education (pp. 116–145). London, UK: Woburn Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cercadillo, L. (2006). “Maybe They Haven’t Decided Yet What Is Right”. English and Spanish Perspectives on Teaching Historical Significance. Teaching History, 125, 6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collingwood, R. G. (1946). The Idea of History. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, A. (2001). Accounting for Interpretations/Interpreting Accounts. Unpublished EdD Institution Focused Study, Institute of Education, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, A. (2009). Towards an Interpretations Heuristic: A Case Study Exploration of 16–19 Year-Old Students’ Ideas About Explaining Variations in Historical Accounts. Unpublished EdD thesis. Institute of Education, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, A. (2011). Historical Interpretations. In I. Davies (Ed.), Debates in History Teaching. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, O. L., Foster, S., & Yeager, E. (2001). Historical Empathy and Perspective Taking in the Social Studies. New York, NY: Roman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, A. K., Gard, A., & Lee, P. J. (1978). Evidence and History in the Classroom. In A. K. Dickinson & P. J. Lee (Eds.), History Teaching and Historical Understanding (pp. 1–20). London, UK: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, A. K., & Lee, P. (1978). Understanding and Research. In A. K. Dickinson & P. J. Lee (Eds.), History Teaching and Historical Understanding (pp. 94–120). London, UK: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, T. (2008). Interpreting National History: Race, Identity, and Pedagogy in Classrooms and Communities. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, S., Ashby, R., & Lee, P. (2008). Usable Historical Pasts. A Study of Students’ Frameworks of the Past. Full Research Report ESRC End of Award Report, RES-000-22-1676. Swindon, UK: ESRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, S., & Crawford, K. (Eds.). (2006). What Shall We Tell the Children? International Perspectives on School History Textbooks. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froeyman, A. (2012). Virtues of Historiography. Journal of the Philosophy of History, 6, 415–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gago, M. (2005). Children’s Understanding of Historical Narrative in Portugal. In R. Ashby, P. Gordon, & P. J. Lee (Eds.), Understanding History: Recent Research in History Education. International Review of History Education (Vol. 4, pp. 77–90). New York, NY: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howson, J., & Shemilt, D. (2011). Frameworks of Knowledge: Dilemmas and Debates. In I. Davies (Ed.), Debates in History Teaching (pp. 73–83). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, Y. (2005). Taiwanese Students’ Understanding of Differences in History Textbook Accounts. In R. Ashby, P. Gordon, & P. J. Lee (Eds.), Understanding History: Recent Research in History Education (pp. 49–61). London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, P. J. (1998). A Lot of Guess Work Goes on: Children’s Understanding of Historical Accounts. Teaching History, 92, 29–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, P. J. (2004). Walking Backwards into Tomorrow: Historical Consciousness and Understanding History. International Journal of Historical Learning, Teaching and Research, 4(1). [Online]. Retrieved November 26, 2015, from https://centres.exeter.ac.uk/historyresource/journal7/7contents.htm

  • Lee, P. J. (2005). Putting Principles into Practice: Understanding History. In M. S. B. Donovan & J. D. Bransford (Eds.), How Students Learn: History in the Classroom. Washington DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, P. J., Ashby, R., & Dickinson, A. K. (2001a). Signs of the Times: The State of History Education in the UK. In A. K. Dickinson, P. Gordon, & P. J. Lee (Eds.), Raising Standards in History Education (pp. 190–218). London, UK: The Woburn Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, P. J., Dickinson, A. K., & Ashby, A. (2001b). Children’s Ideas About Historical Explanation. In A. K. Dickinson, P. Gordon, & P. J. Lee (Eds.), Raising Standards in History Education (pp. 97–115). London, UK: The Woburn Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, P. J., & Howson, J. (2009). “Two Out of Five Did Not Know That Henry VIII Had Six Wives”: History Education, Historical Literacy, and Historical Consciousness. In L. Symcox & A. Wilschut (Eds.), National History Standards: The Problem of the Canon and the Future of Teaching History (pp. 211–261). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, P. J., & Shemilt, D. (2003). A Scaffold, Not a Cage: Progression and Progression Models in History. Teaching History, 113, 13–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, P., & Shemilt, D. (2004). “I Just Wish We Could Back in the Past and Find Out What Really Happened”: Progression in Understanding About Historical Accounts. Teaching History, 117, 25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, P., & Shemilt, D. (2009). Is Any Explanation Better Than None? Teaching History, 137, 42–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, C. (2001). History: Theories and Methods. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences (Vol. 10, pp. 6869–6976). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lowenthal, D. (2015). The Past Is a Foreign Country: Revisited. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. (1989). The Past Within Us. An Empirical Approach to Philosophy of History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDiarmid, G. W. (1994). Understanding History for Teaching: A Study of the Historical Understanding of Prospective Teachers. In M. Carretero & J. F. Voss (Eds.), Cognitive and Instructional Processes in History and the Social Sciences (pp. 159–186). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Megill, A. (2007). Historical Knowledge/Historical Error: A Contemporary Guide to Practice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA)/Department of Children, Schools and Families (DCSF). (2007). Secondary National Curriculum History. London: QCA. [Online]. Retrieved December 3, 2015, from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130802151252/https://www.education.gov.uk/schools/teachingandlearning/curriculum/secondary/b00199545/history

  • Rüsen, J. (2005). History: Narration, Interpretation, Orientation. New York, NY: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seixas, P., & Morton, T. (2013). The Big Six Historical Thinking Concepts. Toronto: Nelson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shemilt, D. (1983). The Devil’s Locomotive. History and Theory, 22, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shemilt, D. (1984). Beauty and the Philosopher: Empathy in History and in Classroom. In A. Dickinson, P. Lee, & P. Rogers (Eds.), Learning History (pp. 39–84). London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shemilt, D. (1987). Adolescent Ideas About Evidence and Methodology in History. In C. Portal (Ed.), The History Curriculum for Teachers (pp. 39–61). London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shemilt, D. (2000). The Caliph’s Coin: The Currency of Narrative Frameworks in History Teaching. In P. N. Stearns, P. Seixas, & S. Wineburg (Eds.), Knowing, Teaching and Learning History: National and International Perspectives (pp. 83–101). New York, NY: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shemilt, D. (2009). Drinking an Ocean and Pissing a Cupful: How Adolescents Make Sense of History. In L. Symcox & A. Wilschut (Eds.), National History Standards: The Problem of the Canon and the Future of Teaching History (pp. 141–210). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanford History Education Group (SHEG). (n.d.). Reading Like a Historian. [Online]. Retrieved November 21, 2015, from https://sheg.stanford.edu/rlh

  • VanSledright, B. A., & Afflerbach, P. (2005). Assessing the Status of Historical Sources: An Exploratory Study of Eight US Elementary Students Reading Documents. In R. Ashby, P. Gordon, & P. J. Lee (Eds.), Understanding History: Recent Research in History Education. International Review of History Education (Vol. 4, pp. 1–19). New York, UK: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Voss, J., Carretero, M., Kennel, J., & Silffies, L. (1994). The Collapse of the Soviet Union: A Case Study in Causal Reasoning. In M. Carretero & J. Voss (Eds.), Cognitive and Instructional Processes in History and the Social Sciences (pp. 403–430). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, W. H. (1959). Colligatory Concepts in History. In P. Gardiner (Ed.), Theories of History (pp. 127–144). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. V. (2002). Voices of Collective Remembering. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. V. (2004). Specific Narratives and Schematic Narrative Templates. In P. Seixas (Ed.), Theorizing Historical Consciousness (pp. 49–62). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cercadillo, L., Chapman, A., Lee, P. (2017). Organizing the Past: Historical Accounts, Significance and Unknown Ontologies. In: Carretero, M., Berger, S., Grever, M. (eds) Palgrave Handbook of Research in Historical Culture and Education. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52908-4_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52908-4_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-52907-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-52908-4

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics