Skip to main content

Design, Trajectories of Reform, and Implementation of Performance Budgeting in Local Governments: A Comparative Study of Germany, Italy, Lithuania, and Norway

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Local Public Sector Reforms in Times of Crisis

Abstract

Since the post-war expansion of the welfare state, citizens have raised their expectations about the role of government. However, in most OECD countries the growth rate of GDP slowed down until its dramatic drop in 2007 due to the worldwide financial crisis. Therefore, budgeting processes and formats have become even more important for supporting political choices, fostering organizational efficiency, and monitoring results. This chapter focuses consistently on performance budgeting as a tool for strategic steering and control—the internal dimension of (post) New Public Management reforms. Based on the transformative approach of Christensen and Lægreid in their book New public management. The transformation of ideas and practice (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2001), we deal with patterns of reform that have introduced steering and control instruments inspired to performance-like measures (accrual accounting, performance-based budget, management control and so on) into four European countries (Germany, Italy, Lithuania, and Norway) at the local government level over last 20 years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bouckaert, G., and J. Halligan. 2008. Managing performance: International comparison. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunsson, N. and J.P. Olsen. 1993. The Reforming Organization. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, T., and P. Lægreid. 2001. New public management. The transformation of ideas and practice. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P.J., and W.W. Powell. 1991. The new institutionalism in organization analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doran, M. 2008. Intergenerational equity in fiscal policy reform. Tax Law Review 61: 241–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst & Young. 2002. Evaluering av KOSTRA. Oslo: Kommunal og regionaldepartementet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Lithuania. 2013. Survey of local government bodies on strategic planning practices. Office of the Government of the Republic of Lithuania Vilnius (unpublished document).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandis, F.G., and G. Mattei. 2012. Is there a specific accrual basis standard for the public sector? Theoretical analysis and harmonization of Italian government accounting. Open Journal of Accounting 2: 27–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossi, G., C. Reichard, and P. Ruggiero. 2016. Appropriateness and use of performance information in the budgeting process: Some experiences from German and Italian municipalities. Public Performance and Management Review 39(3): 581–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. 1991. A public management for all seasons? Public Administration 69(1): 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. 1995. The “new public management” in the 1980s: Variations on a theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society 20(2/3): 93–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, M.L., and M. Juul. 2011. Norske kommuners bruk av KOSTRA til intern styring. Bergen: Masteroppgave, Norges Handelshøyskole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlmann, S. 2010. New public management for the “Classical Continental European Administration”: Modernization at the local level in Germany, France, and Italy. Public Administration 88(4): 1116–1130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlmann, S., and H. Wollmann. 2014. Introduction to comparative public administration. Administrative systems and reforms in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüder, K. 2008. Accrual accounting in German governments. In Het Beroep Accountant Centraal, ed. R.C.W. Eken and P.M. Zanden. Tilburg: Universiteit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marini, G., and P. Scaramozzino. 1999. Social security and intergenerational equity. Journal of Economics 70(1): 17–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mussari, R. 2005. Public sector financial management reform in Italy. In International public financial management reform: Progress, contradictions, and challenges, ed. J. Guthrie, C. Humphrey, O. Olson, and L.R. Jones. Charlotte: Information Age Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mussari, R. Accounting harmonization as a whole-of-government response to the Italian financial crisis. Article under review for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mussari, R., and F. Giordano. 2013. Emerging issues in Italian fiscal federalism: The case of municipalities. In Making multilevel public management work: Stories of success and failure from Europe and North America, ed. D. Cepiku, D.K. Jesuit, and I. Roberge. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakrošis, V. 2008. Reforming performance management in Lithuania: Towards result-based government. In Mixes, matches and mistakes: New public management in Russia and the former Soviet Republics, ed. B.G. Peters. Budapest: Open Society Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyland K. and I. J. Pettersen, 2012, Reforms and clinical managers' responses: a study in Norwegian hospitals. Journal of Health Organization and Management, Vol. 26 (1), pp.15–731.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2007. Performance budgeting in OECD countries. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, J.P. 1992, Analyzing Institutional Dynamics, Staatswissenschaften unStaatspraxis, 2, 247–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ongaro, E. 2011. The role of politics and institutions in the Italian administrative reform trajectory. Public Administration 89(3): 738–755.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C., and G. Bouckaert. 2011. Public management reform: A comparative analysis—new public management, governance, and the Neo-Weberian state, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichard, C. 2003. Local public management reforms in Germany. Public Administration 81(2): 345–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichard, C. 2012. Umsetzung und Praxis des neuen kommunalen Haushalts- und Rechnungswesens. Verwaltung and Management 18(3): 118–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichard, C. 2014. Leistungsinformationen im neuen Kommunalhaushalt—welche Rolle spielen diese Daten in der Praxis? Verwaltung and Management 20(3): 125–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichard, C., and H. Bals. 2002. Resource-based accounting and output-budgeting as common patterns of public sector financial management Reforms. In Evaluation and accounting standards in public management, ed. D. Bräunig and P. Eichhorn. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, M. 2013. Performance budgeting. In International handbook of public financial management, ed. R. Allen, R. Hemming, and B.H. Potter. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schick, A. 2014. The metamorphoses of performance budgeting. OECD Journal on Budgeting 13(2): 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schimmelfennig, F., and U. Sedelmeier (eds.). 2005. The Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statskonsult. 2001. Kartlegging av kommunenes bruk av KOSTRA. Oslo: Kommunal og regionaldepartementet (KRD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dooren, W., G. Bouckaert, and J. Halligan. 2010. Performance management in the public sector. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhoest, K., P.G. Roness, B. Verschuere, K. Rubecksen, and M. MacCarthaigh. 2010. Autonomy and control of state agencies: Comparing states and agencies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zapico-Goñi, E. 1996. Performance monitoring for budget management: A new role of the budget center. In Monitoring performance in the public sector, ed. J. Mayne and E. Zapico-Goñi. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mussari, R., Tranfaglia, A.E., Reichard, C., Bjørnå, H., Nakrošis, V., Bankauskaitė-Grigaliūnienė, S. (2016). Design, Trajectories of Reform, and Implementation of Performance Budgeting in Local Governments: A Comparative Study of Germany, Italy, Lithuania, and Norway. In: Kuhlmann, S., Bouckaert, G. (eds) Local Public Sector Reforms in Times of Crisis. Governance and Public Management. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52548-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics