Skip to main content

Key Themes and Concepts

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Poststructural Policy Analysis

Abstract

The “What’s the Problem Represented to be?” (WPR) approach invokes a number of concepts that require elaboration. Many rely, at least to an extent, upon the writings of Michel Foucault, indicated in the quotations from his works. This chapter explains how these concepts are interlinked and how they function to produce the form of theorizing enabled by a WPR form of analysis. The following topics are addressed: what it means to describe policy as productive; the kinds of practices targeted for scrutiny; how discourses feature in the analysis; what is involved in problematizing and problematization; what is achieved by expanding “government” to include the roles of professionals, experts, and allied agencies; how genealogy produces a “history of the present”; the place of political “subjects” in a Foucault-influenced analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a poststructuralist it is important to note that the interviewed students remain within discourse, here adopting the subject position of “Marseillais” or from Marseilles, France. See Appendix.

Bibliography

  • Aitken, R. (2006). Performativity, popular finance and security in the global political economy. In M. de Goede (Ed.), International political economy and poststructural politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2013). Constructing research questions: Doing interesting research. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Government (2007). Changing behaviour: A public policy perspective. Canberra: Australian Public Service Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacchi, C. (1999). Women, policy and politics: The construction of policy problems. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacchi, C. (2009). Analysing policy: What’s the problem represented to be? Frenchs Forest: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacchi, C. (2012). Why study problematizations? Making politics visible. Open Journal of Political Science, 2 (1), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacchi, C. (2015a). The turn to problematization: Political implications of contrasting interpretive and poststructural adaptations. Open Journal of Political Science, 5, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacchi, C. (2015b). Problematizations in alcohol policy: WHO’s “alcohol problems”. Contemporary Drug Problems, 42 (2), 130–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacchi, C. (2016a). Policies as gendering practices: Re-viewing categorical distinctions, Journal of Women, Politics and Policy, DOI:10.1080/1554477X.2016.1198207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacchi, C., & Bonham, J. (2014). Reclaiming discursive practices as an analytic focus: Political implications. Foucault Studies, 17, 173–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacchi, C., & Eveline, J. (eds) (2010). Mainstreaming politics: Gendering practices and feminist theory. Adelaide: University of Adelaide Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernauer, J.W. (1992). Michel Foucault’s force of flight: Toward an ethics for thought. New Jersey: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigo, D. (2002). Security and immigration: Toward a critique of the governmentality of unease. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 27, 63–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bletsas, A. (2012). Spaces between: Elaborating the theoretical underpinnings of the “WPR” approach and its significance for contemporary scholarship. In A. Bletsas, & C. Beasley (Eds.), Engaging with Carol Bacchi: Strategic interventions and exchanges. Adelaide: University of Adelaide Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonham, J., Bacchi, C., Wanner, T. (2015). Gender and cycling: Gendering cycling subjects and forming bikes, practices and spaces as gendered objects. In J. Bonham, & M. Johnson (Eds.), Cycling futures. Adelaide: University of Adelaide Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bordo, S. (2003). Unbearable weight: Feminism, western culture, and the body. California: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. (1998). Genealogical politics. In J. Moss (Ed.), The later Foucault: Politics and philosophy. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex”. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, K., & Watson, P. (1996). Policing sexual violence: Feminism, criminal justice and governmentality. International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 24 (3), 253–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, P.M. (2013). Poststructuralist theory and sociolinguistics: Mapping the linguistic turn in social theory. Language and Linguistics Compass, 7 (11), 580–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J., & Newman, J. (2009). Elusive publics: Knowledge, power and public service reform. In S. Gewirtz, P. Mahony, I. Hextall, A. Cribb (Eds.), Changing teacher professionalism: International trends, challenges, and ways forward. UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, M. (2001). Political genealogy after Foucault: Savage identities. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clough, P.T. (2007). Notes towards a theory of affect-itself. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization, 7, 60–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, C. (2014). Male rape is a feminist issue: Feminism, governmentality and male rape. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Colebatch, H., Hoppe, R., Noordegraaf, M. (2010). The lessons for policy work. In H. Colebatch, R. Hoppe, M. Noordgraaf (Eds.), Working for policy. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, M. (1999). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, M. (2002). A genealogy of the government of poverty. Economy and Society, 21 (3), 215–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, M., & Hindess, B. (1998). Governing Australia: Studies in contemporary rationalities of government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Death, C. (2006). Resisting (nuclear) power? Environmental regulation in South Africa. Review of African Political Economy, 33 (109), 407–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Death, C. (2010). Counter-conducts: A Foucauldian analytics of protest. Social Movement Studies, 9 (3), 235–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Goede, M. (2006). International political economy and the promises of poststructuralism. In M. de Goede (Ed.), International political economy and poststructural politics. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1992). Foucault. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhamoon, R.K. (2011). Considerations on mainstreaming intersectionality. Political Research Quarterly, 64 (1), 230–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H.L., & Rabinow, P. (1983). Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics, 2nd edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • du Rose, N. (2015). The governance of female drug users: Women’s experiences of drug policy. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eribon, D. (1991). Michel Foucault. London: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eveline, J. (2005). Woman in the Ivory Tower: Gendering feminised and masculinised identities. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 18 (6), 641–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewald, F. (1991). Insurance and risk. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ezzamel, M., & Willmott, H. (2009). Strategy and strategizing: A poststructuralist perspective. The Globalization of Strategy Research, Advances in Strategic Management, 27, 75–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, B. (2012). Transformative policy for poor women: A new feminist framework. Surrey: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F. (1980). Politics, values and public policy: The problem of methodology. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, T. (1989). Symposiums papers: Foucault and the politics of postmodernity. Noûs, 23 (2), 187–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, T. (2006). Foucault’s mapping of history. In G. Gutting (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Foucault, 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1969). Pamphlet submitted to Professors of the Collège de France. Cited in D. Eribon (1991) Michel Foucault, Wing, B. (trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge, and the discourse on language (trans: Sheridan Smith, A.M.). New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977) [1971]. Nietzsche, genealogy, history. In D.F. Bouchard, (Ed.), Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (trans: Sheridan, A.). New York: Vintage/Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980). Two lectures. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Michel Foucault power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977 by Michel Foucault. Gordon, C., Marshall, L., Mepham, J. and Soper, K. (trans.). New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1984a). The means of correct training [from Discipline and Punish]. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault reader. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1984b), What is Enlightenment? In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault reader. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1986) [1984], The use of pleasure. The history of sexuality, Volume 2, (trans: Hurley, R.). London: Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1987). The ethic of care for the self as a practice of freedom: An interview with Michel Foucault on January 20, 1984, with R. Fornet-Betancourt, H. Becker, A. Gomez-Müller, J.C. Gauthier, Philosophy & Social Criticism, 12, 112–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1990a) [1978]. The history of sexuality. Volume I: An introduction (trans: Hurley, R.). New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1990b). Critical theory/intellectual history. In L. Kritzman (Ed.), Michel Foucault: Politics, philosophy, culture: Interviews & other writings 1977–1984, 1st edition 1988, Sheridan, A. (trans.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1990c). The concern for truth. In L.D. Kritzman (Ed.), Michel Foucault: Politics, philosophy, culture. Interviews and other writings, 1977–1984, 1st edition 1988, A. Sheridan, (trans.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1991a) [1978]. Politics and the study of discourse. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1991b) [1981]. Questions of method. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1991c) [1978]. Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1994a) [1981]. So is it important to think? In J.D. Faubion, (Ed.), Power: Essential works of Foucault 1954–1984, vol. 3, Hurley, R. and others (trans.). London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1994b). Table ronde du 20 mai 1978. In D. Defert, & F. Ewald (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Dits et Écrits, tome IV. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2000) [1982]. The subject and power. In J.D. Faubion (Ed.), Power: Essential works of Foucault 1954–1984, vol. 3, Hurley, R. and others (trans.). New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2003). Society must be defended. In M. Bertani, & A. Fontana (Eds.), Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–76, Macey, D. (trans.). New York: Picador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics. In M. Senellart (Ed.), Lectures at the Collège de France 1978–1979, G. Burchell (trans.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2009). Security, territory, population: Lectures at the Collège de France 1977–1978, Senellart, M. (ed.), Burchell, G. (trans.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, S., Moore, D., Keane, H. (2014). Habits: Remaking addiction. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi, S. (2009). Introduction: The critical power of the “practice lens”. Management Learning, 40 (2), 115–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golder, B. (2010). Foucault and the unfinished human of rights. Law, Culture and the Humanities, 6 (3), 354–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, N. (1996). Governmentality in the Queensland Department of Education: Policies and the management of schools. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 17 (1), 65–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, C. (1991). Governmental rationality: An introduction. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulson, K.N., & Metcalfe, A.S. (2015). Introduction: Education policy analysis for a complex world: Poststructural possibilities. Critical Studies in Education, 56 (1), 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P. (1999). Public welfare and liberal governance. In A. Petersen, I. Barns, J. Dudley, P. Harris (Eds.), Poststructuralism, citizenship and social policy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugaard, M., & Clegg, S. (2009). Introduction: Why power is the central concept of the social sciences. In S. Clegg, & M. Haugaard (Eds.), The Sage handbook of power. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henman, P. (2006). Segmentation and conditionality: Technological reconfigurations in social policy and social citizenship. In G. Marston, & C. McDonald, (Eds.), Analysing social policy: A governmental approach. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoppe, R. (2002). Cultures of public policy problems. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 4 (3), 305–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoppe, R. (2011). The governance of problems: Puzzling, power and participation. Bristol: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inda, J. (2005). Analytics of the modern: An introduction. In J. Inda (Ed.), Anthropologies of modernity: Foucault, governmentality and life politics. Malden: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, C. (2013). Genealogy as critique: Foucault and the problems of modernity. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulynych, J.J. (1997). Performing politics: Foucault, Habermas and postmodern participation. Polity, 30 (2), 315–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larner, W. (2000). Neo-liberalism: Policy, ideology, governmentality. Studies in Political Economy, 63, 5–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larner, W. (2008). Comments on Kevin Stenson’s “Governing the local: Sovereignty, social governance and community safety”. Social Work and Society – International Online Journal, 6 (1), 21–25, www.socwork.net/sws/article/download/87/144. Accessed 14 January, 2016.

  • Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHoul, A., & Grace, W. (1993). A Foucault primer: Discourse, power and the subject. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. (2001). Governing by numbers: Why calculative practices matter. Social Research, 68 (2), 379–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P., & Rose, N. (1990). Governing economic life. Economy and Society, 19 (1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, K. (2006). Neoliberal governmentality in the European Union: Education, training and technologies of citizenship. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 24, 389–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mol, A. (1999). Ontological politics: A word and some questions. In J. Law, & J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor network theory and after. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, T. (1997). Of health and statecraft. In A. Petersen, & R. Bunton (Eds.), Foucault: Health and medicine. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postill, J. (2010). Introduction: Theorizing media and practice. In B. Bräuchler, & J. Postill (Eds.), Theorizing media and practice. Oxford and New York: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prügl, E. (2015). Neoliberalising feminism. New Political Economy , 20 (4), 614–631, doi:10.1080/13563467.2014.951614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabinow, P. (2003). Anthropos today: Reflections on modern equipment. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Race, K. (2005). Recreational states: Drugs and the sovereignty of consumption. Culture Machine, 7, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ristovski-Slijepcevic, S., Chapman, G., Beagan, B. (2010). Being a “good mother”: Dietary governmentality in the family food practices of three ethnocultural groups in Canada. Health, 14 (5), 467–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rönnblom, M. (2012). Post-structural comparative politics: Acknowledging the political effects of research. In A. Bletsas, & C. Beasley (Eds.), Engaging with Carol Bacchi: Strategic interventions and exchanges. Adelaide: University of Adelaide Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1991). Governing by numbers: Figuring out democracy. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 16 (7), 673–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (2000). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought, 1st edition 1999. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N., O’Malley, P., Valverde, M. (2006). Governmentality, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2, 83–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowse, T. (2009). The ontological politics of “closing the gaps”. Journal of Cultural Economy, 2 (1&2), 33–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanger, T. (2008). Trans governmentality: The production and regulation of gendered subjectivities. Journal of Gender Studies, 17 (1), 41–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T. (2001). Introduction: Practice theory. In T. Schatzki, K.K. Cetina, E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, C. (1996). Deconstructing motherhood. In E. Silva (Ed.), Good enough mothering? Feminist perspectives on lone motherhood. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. Pierre, E.A. (2006). Scientifically based research in education: Epistemology and ethics. Adult Education Quarterly, 56, 239–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamboukou, M. (1999). Writing genealogies: An exploration of Foucault’s strategies for doing research. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 20 (2), 201–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanesini, A. (1994). Whose language? In K. Lennon, & M. Whitford (Eds.), Knowing the difference: Feminist perspectives in epistemology. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, N. (2010). Whither problem-oriented policing? Criminology and Public Policy, 9 (1), 183–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull, N. (2005). Policy in question: From problem solving to problematology, PhD thesis, School of Social Science and Policy, University of New South Wales, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valverde, M. (1998). Diseases of the will: Alcohol and the dilemmas of freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veyne, P. (1997). Foucault revolutionizes history. In A.I. Davidson (Ed.), Foucault and his Interlocutors, Porter, C. (trans.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, W. (2004). Secure borders, safe haven, domopolitics. Citizenship Studies, 8, 237–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, W. (2006). “The end of the passing past”: Towards polytemporal policy studies. In G. Marston, & C. McDonald (Eds.), Reframing social policy: A governmental approach. London: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, W. (2009). Europe’s borders. In C. Rumford (Ed.), The Sage handbook of European Studies. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weedon, C. (1987). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zournazi, M. (2002). Navigating movements: An interview with Brian Massumi. In M. Zournazi (Ed.), Hope: New Philosophies for Change. Annandale, NSW: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bacchi, C., Goodwin, S. (2016). Key Themes and Concepts. In: Poststructural Policy Analysis. Palgrave Pivot, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52546-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics