Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Poststructural Policy Analysis

Abstract

The Introduction articulates how a poststructural approach to policy analysis provides an important vehicle for questioning how governing takes place. It begins by sketching the broad parameters of a poststructural approach as a form of critical analysis that allows a refreshing skepticism toward the full range of things commonly associated with policy: policy itself, the knowledges that support policy and policy proposals, as well as conventional forms of policy analysis. The implication of this form of critical analysis for policy work is explained—how a poststructural approach encourages policy workers to reflect on their own role in governing and to engage in the productive and political practices of interrogating, theorizing, and resisting. The Introduction also sets out the structure of the book.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The use of scare quotes to signal contingency is particularly important for the treatment of “problems”, since the book is concerned to put in question the common assumption in many approaches to policy analysis that “problems” simply exist and that their meaning is clear and uncontentious (see Chapter 4). Scare quotes will be omitted only in those cases where it is evident that a specific theoretical stance approaches objects, subjects, places, and problems as unproblematized “entities”.

Bibliography

  • Allan, E. (2012). Policy discourses, gender, and education: Constructing women’s status. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacchi, C. (2009). Analysing policy: What’s the problem represented to be? Frenchs Forest: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S.J. (1990). Politics and policy making in education: Explorations in policy sociology. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S.J. (1993). What is policy? Texts, trajectories and toolboxes. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 13 (2), 10–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S.J. (1997). Policy sociology and critical social research: A personal review of recent education policy and policy research. British Educational Research Journal, 23 (3), 257–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S.J. (2015). What is policy? 21 years later: Reflections on the possibilities of policy research. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36 (3), 306–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. (1998). Genealogical politics. In J. Moss (Ed.), The later Foucault: Politics and philosophy. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffey, A. (2004). Reconceptualizing social policy: Sociological perspectives on contemporary social policy. Berkshire: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, G. (2007). Following or facing the governmental gaze: Academic and policy intellectuals in the early twenty-first century, Roundtable, Conference of the Canadian Anthropological Society—American Ethnological Society, University of Toronto, May 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, B. (2012). Transformative policy for poor women: A new feminist framework. Surrey: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, C. (1991). Governmental rationality: An introduction. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P. (1999). Public welfare and liberal governance. In A. Petersen, I. Barns, J. Dudley, P. Harris (Eds.), Poststructuralism, citizenship and social policy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, P. (1998). Analyzing Public Policy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lall, M. (2007). A review of concepts from policy studies relevant for the analysis of EFA [Education for All] in developing countries, Consortium for Research on Educational Access, Transitions & Equity (CREATE), Sussex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lall, M. (ed.) (2012). Policy, discourse and rhetoric: How New Labour challenged social justice and democracy. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lister, R. (2010). Understanding theories and concepts in social policy. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddison, S., & Denniss, N. (2013). An introduction to Australian public policy: Theory and practice, 2nd edition. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P., & Rose, N. (1990). Governing economic life. Economy and Society, 19 (1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mol, A. (1999). Ontological politics: A word and some questions. In J. Law, & J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor network theory and after. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley, P., Weir, L., Shearing, C. (1997). Governmentality, criticism, politics. Economy and Society, 26 (4), 501–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N., O’Malley, P., Valverde, M. (2006). Governmentality, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2, 83–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, S.E. (2010). Reaching the parts that other theories and methods can’t reach: How and why a policy-as-discourse approach can inform health-related policy. Health, 14 (2), 196–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shore, C. (2012). Anthropology and public policy. In R. Fardon, T. Harris, T.H.J. Marchand, C. Shore, V. Strang, R. Wilson, M. Nuttall (Eds.), The Sage handbook of Social Anthropology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shore, C., & Wright, S. (2003). Policy: A new field of Anthropology. In C. Shore, & S. Wright (Eds.), Anthropology of policy: Perspectives on governance and power. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shore, C., & Wright, S. (2011). Conceptualising policy: Technologies of governance and the politics of visibility. In C. Shore, S. Wright, D. Però (Eds.), Policy worlds: Anthropology and the analysis of contemporary power. New York: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. Pierre, E.A. (2000). Poststructural feminism in education: An overview. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 13 (5), 477–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, R. (1999). The policy process: An overview. London: Overseas Development Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, S. (2000). Foucault and the study of social policy. In G. Lewis, S. Gerwitz, J. Clarke (Eds.), Rethinking social policy. New York: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bacchi, C., Goodwin, S. (2016). Introduction. In: Poststructural Policy Analysis. Palgrave Pivot, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52546-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics