Abstract
Anachronisms are widely used in the social sciences and humanities, yet hardly studied. The construction of historical narratives is problematic due to the projection of contemporary thinking. Even more problematic is the use of historical analogies for future planning. Projection of nineteenth-century state-centric geopolitical thinking is especially problematic, reifying an exceptional period in European history that culminated in two world wars (the Thirty Years War, 1914–1945, and the Cold War, 1945–1991). Still, anachronistic thinking is unavoidable, both in trying to understand the past and in trying to plan for the future. Therefore, the awareness of anachronisms needs to be raised, and the arsenal of “lessons from history” needs to be expanded to enrich the options for developing new security policies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsAuthor information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
de Wilde, J.H. (2017). Anachronistic Research in International Relations and Security Studies. In: Jacob, E. (eds) Rethinking Security in the Twenty-First Century. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52542-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52542-0_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-52541-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-52542-0
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)