Advertisement

Social Economy and Women in Iran

  • Roksana Bahramitash
  • Atena Sadegh
  • Negin Sattari
Chapter

Abstract

The social solidarity economy essentially operates through a mix of both public and private sector elements using both formal and informal methods at organizational and financial levels (including volunteering, state funds, in-kind support, self-help groups, etc.), making it very hard to define as a category. It is nearly impossible to quantify its social and economic benefits but equally impossible to deny its importance in sustaining the economy. This chapter provides an insight into how it operates as an informal community-based initiative operating through religious venues.

Keywords

Social economy Socio-economic justice Third sector Market and non-market oriented production Collective responsibility Economic alternatives Opportunistic advantage Informal community network 

Bibliography

  1. Bahramitash, R. (2005). Liberation from Liberalization: Gender and Globalization in Southeast Asia. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  2. Bahramitash, R. (2013). Gender and Entrepreneurship in Iran: Microenterprise and the Informal Sector. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  3. Bahramitash, R. (2014). Low-Income Islamic Women, Poverty and the Solidarity Economy in Iran. Middle East. Critique, 23(3), 363–377.Google Scholar
  4. Bidet, É. (1997). L’Économie Social. Paris: Le Monde-Editions.Google Scholar
  5. Demoustier, Danièle, & Rousseliere, Damien. (2004). Social Economy as Social Science and Practice: Historical Perspectives on France 1. Laboratoire d’Economie de la Production et de l’Intégration Internationale. Retrieved July 31, 2017, from http://base.socioeco.org/docs/cahr_emoi6.pdf.
  6. Lévesque, B., & Mendell, M.. (2005). L’économie sociale: diversité des définitions et des constructions théoriques, Revenue: Interventions Économiques. Retrieved July 31, 2017, from https://interventionseconomiques.revues.org/852.
  7. Moulaert, Frank, & Ailenei, Oana. (2005). Social Economy, Third Sector and Solidarity Relations: A Conceptual Synthesis from History to Present. Urban Studies, Vol. 42, No. 11, 2037–2053. Retrieved July 31, 2017, from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/055b/7c32213070924fa45fe87c11b3ad33908ae7.pdf.
  8. Neamtam, Nancy. (2005). The Social Economy: Finding a Way Between the Market and the State. Policy Opinions. Retrieved August 04, 2017, from http://havenscenter.wisc.edu/files/Neamtan2005_PolicyOptions.pdf.
  9. Poirier, Yvon. (2014). Social Solidarity Economy and related concepts. Retrieved August 04, 2017, from https://ccednet-rcdec.ca/sites/ccednet-rcdec.ca/files/ccednet/solidarity_economy_and_other_concepts-poirier-july-2014.pdf.
  10. Schifferes, Steve. (2005). Blow to EU economic reform hopes, BBC News. Retrieved July 04, 2017, from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/4602565.stm.
  11. Social and Solidarity Economy and the Challenge of Sustainable Development. (2014). United Nations Inter-Agency Task Force on Social and Solidarity Economy. Retrieved July 31, 2017, from http://unsse.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Position-Paper_TFSSE_Eng1.pdf.
  12. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development. (2011). Social Development in an Uncertain World: UNRISD Research Agenda: 2010–2014. Retrieved March 11, 2018, from http://www.unrisd.org/80256B42004CCC77/(httpInfoFiles)/43BFA3387807E7E680257920004253C7/$file/ResAge10-14a.pdf.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roksana Bahramitash
    • 1
  • Atena Sadegh
    • 2
  • Negin Sattari
    • 3
  1. 1.Montreal-based Scholar and ConsultantMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Étude Économique ConseilMontrealCanada
  3. 3.University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations