Skip to main content

Empowering People with Intellectual Disabilities to Challenge Stigma

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Empowering people with intellectual disabilities to challenge stigma is complex. In many countries, decades of social policy designed to promote equal rights and enhance social inclusion have failed to generate the social conditions or the types of support arrangements necessary for people with intellectual disabilities to lead self-determined lives. Their deeply stigmatized social identities are difficult to manage and the disability rights movement has often not welcomed their participation, leaving individuals with few options to challenge negative perceptions. Self-advocacy groups offer distinct social spaces that enable people with intellectual disabilities to develop more positive social identities and engage in ‘subtle radicalism’ that challenges stigma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abberley, P. (2002). Work, disability and European social theory. In C. Barnes, M. Oliver, & L. Barton (Eds.), Disability studies today (pp. 121–138). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S. (2013). ‘We just help them be them really—Building positive, included identities: engagement in self-advocacy groups by adults with intellectual disabilities (Unpublished PhD thesis). LaTrobe University, Melbourne, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S., & Bigby, C. (2015). Self-advocacy as a means to positive identities for people with intellectual disability: “We just help them, be them really”. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disability. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/jar.12223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1996). From pilgrim to tourist—Or a short history of identity. In S. Hall & P. du Gay (Eds.), Questions of cultural identity (pp. 18–36). London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beart, S., Hardy, G., & Buchan, L. (2005). How people with intellectual disabilities view their social identity: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 18, 47–56. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3148.2004.00218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beresford, P. (2012). The theory and philosophy behind user involvement. In P. Beresford & S. Carr (Eds.), Social care, service users and user involvement (pp. 21–37). London, UK: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigby, C. (2015a). Self-advocacy and inclusion: A summary of the study ‘What can be learned from speaking up over the years’. La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia: Living with Disability Research Centre. Retrieved from https://engage.dss.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Final-self-advocacy-and-inclusion-what-can-be-learned-from-speaking-up-over-the-years-Bigby-21-07-2015.pdf

  • Bigby, C. (2015b). Is the national disability insurance scheme taking account of people with intellectual disability (Editorial). Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 1, 93–97. doi:10.1080/23297018.2014.974484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigby, C., Frawley, P., & Ramcharan, P. (2014). A collaborative group method of inclusive research. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disability, 27, 54–64. doi:10.1111/jar.12082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, M. (2010). Levelling the disability hierarchy. Eureka Street, 20, 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, J. (2010). Leadership development of individuals with developmental disabilities in the self-advocacy movement. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 54, 1004–1014. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01326.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clement, T., & Bigby, C. (2010). Group homes for people with intellectual disabilities: Encouraging inclusion and participation. London, UK: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, D., & Bigby, C. (2015). ‘She’s been involved in everything as far as I can see’: Supporting the active participation of people with intellectual disability in community groups. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 40, 12–25. doi:10.3109/13668250.2014.977235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowse, L. (2001). Contesting practices, challenging codes: Self-advocacy, disability politics and the social model. Disability and Society, 16, 123–141. doi:10.1080/09687590020020903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edgerton, R. (1993). The cloak of competence (Revised and updated ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlay, M., & Lyons, E. (1998). Social identity and people with learning difficulties: Implications for self-advocacy groups. Disability and Society, 13, 37–51. doi:10.1080/09687599826902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frawley, P., & Bigby, C. (2015). Reflections on being a first generation self-advocate: Belonging, social connections and doing things that matter. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 40, 254–264. doi:10.3109/13668250.2015.1028910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frawley, P., Bigby, C., Banfield, D., Blythman, N., Rosengrave, J., Hiscoe, A., et al. (2013). Reinforce self-advocacy: Speaking up over the years. Melbourne, Australia: La Trobe University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. London, UK: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodley, D. (2000). Self-advocacy in the lives of people with learning difficulties. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodley, D. (2004). The place of people with ‘learning difficulties’ in disability studies and research: Introduction to this special issue. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 49–51. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3156.2004.00279.

  • Goodley, D., & Roets, G. (2015). The (be)comings and goings of ‘developmental disabilities’: The cultural politics of ‘impairment. Discourse: Studies in Cultural Politics of Education, 29, 239–255. doi:10.1080/01596300801966971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E., & Wilton, R. (2011). Alternative spaces of ‘work ‘and inclusion for disabled people. Disability and Society, 26, 867–880. doi:10.1080/09687599.2011.618742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubert, J. (2000). The social, individual and moral consequences of physical exclusion in long-stay institutions. In J. Hubert (Ed.), Madness, disability and social exclusion. The archaeology and anthropology of ‘difference’ (pp. 196–207). London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNally, S. (2002). A survey of self-advocacy groups for people with learning disabilities in an English region. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 6, 185–199. doi:10.1177/14690047030073004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milner, P., & Kelly, B. (2009). Community participation and inclusion: People with disabilities defining their place. Disability and Society, 24, 47–62. doi:10.1080/09687590802535410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nind, M., & Seale, J. (2009). Concepts of access for people with learning difficulties: Towards a shared understanding. Disability and Society, 24, 273–287. doi:10.1080/09687590902789446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Productivity Commission (2011). Disability support and care. Canberra, Australia: Productivity Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapley, M. (2004). The social construction of intellectual disability. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, T. (2006). Disability rights and wrongs. London, UK: Taylor and Francis Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, T., & Watson, N. (2002). The social model of disability: An outdated ideology? Research in Social Science and Disability, 2, 9–28. doi:10.1016/S1479-3547(01)80018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szivos, S., & Griffiths, E. (1990). Group processes involved in coming to terms with a mentally retarded identity. Mental Retardation, 28, 333–341. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3156.2008.00507.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sian Anderson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Anderson, S., Bigby, C. (2016). Empowering People with Intellectual Disabilities to Challenge Stigma. In: Scior, K., Werner, S. (eds) Intellectual Disability and Stigma. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52499-7_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics