Conclusion: Re-Kinning First Mothers
The concluding chapter sketches the contours of a more just adoption system, which would address the distortions caused by uneven power and vital inequality. The findings of previous chapters are interpreted from the frameworks of reproductive justice and transnationalism. Instead of framing transnational adoption as a privileged individualised choice, these approaches concentrate on increasing the range of options for all women and reveal the connectivity between giving and receiving children in adoption. In addition, attention is given to the clash between first mothers’ concerns and the Global North-centric understandings of family and adoption inherent in the current adoption system.
KeywordsInternational Treaty Adoptive Parent Adoptable Child Hague Convention Adoptive Family
- A Decade of Transition. (2001). Regional monitoring report 8. The Monee Project, CEE/CIS/Baltics. UNICEF, Innocenti Research Centre, Florence, Italy.Google Scholar
- Berge, J. M., Mendenhall, T. J., Wrobel, G. M., Grotevant, H. D., & McRoy, R. G. (2007). Adolescents’ feelings about openness in adoption: Implications for adoption agencies. Child Welfare, LXXXV(6), 1011–1039.Google Scholar
- Bhambra, G. K. (2014). Connected sociologies. London/New Delhi/New York/Sydney: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
- Butler-Sweet, C. (2014). ‘Acting White’ and ‘acting Black’. Exploring transracial adoption, middle-class families, and racial socialization. In V. Bashi Treitler (Ed.), Race in transnational and transracial adoption. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Cantwell, N. (2003). Intercountry adoption. A comment on the number of ‘Adoptable’ children and the number of Persons seeking to adopt internationally. The Judge’s Newsletter, V(Spring 2003). A publication of the Hague Conference on Private International Law.Google Scholar
- Cantwell, N. (2014). The best interests of the child in intercountry adoption. Florence: Innocenti Insight and UNICEF Office of Research. https://www.unicefirc. org/publications/712/. Accessed 12 Oct 2016.Google Scholar
- Chrisler, J. C. (2012). Introduction. What is reproductive justice. In J. C. Chrisler (Ed.), Reproductive justice: A global concern. Santa Barbara: Praeger.Google Scholar
- Cornwall, A., & Rivas, A. (2015). From ‘gender equality and ‘women’s empowerment’ to global justice: Reclaiming a transformative agenda for gender and development. Third World Quarterly, 36(2), 396–415.Google Scholar
- Courtney, M. & Piliavin, I. (1998). Struggling in the adult world. Washington Post, 21 July.Google Scholar
- Ferguson, J. (2006). Global shadows. Africa in the neoliberal world order. Durham/London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
- Ge, X., Natsuaki, M. N., Martin, D. M., Leve, L. D., Neiderhiser, J. M., Shaw, D. S., Villareal, G., Scaramella, L., Reid, J. B., & Reiss, D. (2008). Bridging the divide: Openness in adoption and postadoption psychosocial adjustment among birth and adoptive parents. Journal of Family Psychology, 22(3), 529–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gray, B. (2011). Empathy, emotion and feminist solidarities. In R. Willemijn & K. Steenbergh (Eds.), Sexed sentiments: Interdisciplinary perspectives on gender and emotion (Critical studies series, Vol. 34). Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.Google Scholar
- Högbacka, R. (2014). Intercountry adoption, countries of origin, and biological families. K. E. Cheney (Ed.) (ISS working paper series, general series, Vol. 598). International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University, http://hdl.handle.net/1765/77406. Accessed 12 Oct 2016.
- Khanna, R. (2001). Ethical ambiguities and specters of colonialism: Futures of transnational feminism. In E. Bronfen and M. Kavka (Eds.), Feminist consequences: Theory for the new century. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Latchford, F. J. (2012). Reckless abandon. The politics of victimization and agency in birthmother narratives. In F. J. Latchford (Ed.), Adoption and mothering. Bradford/Ontario: Demeter Press.Google Scholar
- Neil, E. (2010). The benefits and challenges of direct post-adoption contact: Perspectives from adoptive parents and birth relatives. ALOMA: Revista de Psicologia, Ciències de l’Educació i de l’Esport, 27, 89–115.Google Scholar
- Penn, H. (2009). The parenting and substitute parenting of young children. In G. Bentley & R. Mace (Eds.), Substitute parents. New York/Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
- Pratt, M. L. (1992). Imperial eyes. Travel writing and transculturation. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- SisterSong Women of Color Reproductive Justice Collective. What is reproductive justice? http://sistersong.net/reproductive-justice/. Accessed 12 Oct 2016.
- Smolin, D. (2007). Intercountry adoption and poverty: A human rights analysis. Capital Law Review, 36(2), 413–453.Google Scholar
- West, R. (2014). From choice to reproductive justice: De-constitutionalizing abortion rights. In R. West, J. Murray, & M. Esser (Eds.), Gender in law, culture, and society: In search of common ground on abortion: From culture war to reproductive justice. Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar