Advertisement

The Making of the Adoptive Family: Choosing Family

  • Riitta Högbacka
Chapter

Abstract

Högbacka investigates the formation of the Northern adoptive family, the focus being on the aims, hopes and manoeuvres of adoptive parents as they navigate the adoption system. The aim is to explore the process through which the adoptive family came into existence. The chapter thus concentrates on the early trajectory of becoming an adoptive family, demonstrating the unintended consequences of the laws of demand (for adoptable children) and supply (of such children) for the dynamics of family formation. In order to fulfil their family dreams, adopters are required to become rational and purposeful actors in a competitive market. The connections between kinning (of adopters) and de-kinning (of first mothers) are also explicated.

Keywords

Foster Parenting Adoptive Parent Adoption Process Biological Child Adopted Child 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Archer, M. S. (2000). Being human: The problem of agency. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Archer, M. S. (2012). The reflexive imperative in late modernity. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowie, F. (2004). Adoption and the circulation of children. A comparative perspective. In F. Bowie (Ed.), Cross-cultural approaches to adoption. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Brian, K. (2012). Framing transracial adoption. Adopted Koreans, white parents and the politics of kinship. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Butler-Sweet, C. (2014). ‘Acting White’ and ‘acting Black’. Exploring transracial adoption, middle-class families, and racial socialization. In V. Bashi Treitler (Ed.), Race in transnational and transracial adoption. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. De Graeve, K. (2012). Making families. Parenting and belonging in transnational adoption in Flanders. PhD Thesis, Comparative Sciences of Culture, Gent University, Belgium.Google Scholar
  7. Dorow, S. (2002). China R Us? Care, consumption, and transnationally adopted children. In D. T. Cook (Ed.), Symbolic childhood. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  8. Dorow, S. (2006a). Transnational adoption: A cultural economy of race, gender and kinship. New York/London: New York University press.Google Scholar
  9. Dorow, S. (2006b). Racialized choices: Chinese adoption and the ‘white noise’ of blackness. Critical Sociology, 32(2–3), 357–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eriksson, P. (2009). “Adoptiossa mikään ei ole varmaa ennen kuin lapsen saa syliinsä” – asiakkaiden kokemuksia kansainvälisestä adoptioprosessista (Clients’ experiences of the intercountry adoption process). Helsinki: FSKC Rapporter 10.Google Scholar
  11. Gailey, C. W. (2010). Blue-ribbon babies and labours of love: Race, class, and gender in U.S. adoption practice. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  12. Glick Schiller, N., & Salazar, N. B. (2013). Regimes of mobility across the globe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 39(2), 183–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goldberg, R. (2006). Adopting older Russian children: An overview. Paper given at the annual meeting of the American sociological association in August, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
  14. Greiff, K. von. (2004). Föräldrar till internationellt adopterade barn. (Parents of internationally adopted children). FoU-rapport 1, Nordost.Google Scholar
  15. Haataja, M. (2014). Suomalaista perhettä tekemässä: Kansainvälinen adoptioperhe aikakauslehdissä 1990–2009 (The transnationally adoptive family in popular magazines 1990–2009), Sosiologian pro gradu –tutkielma (Master’s Thesis in Sociology), Helsingin yliopisto. University of Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
  16. Hays, S. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Howell, S. (2003). Kinning: The creation of life trajectories in transnational adoptive families. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 9(3), 465–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Howell, S. (2006). The kinning of foreigners. Transnational adoption in a global perspective. New York: Berghahn books.Google Scholar
  19. Howell, S., & Marre, D. (2006). To Kin a transnationally adopted child in Norway and Spain: The achievement of resemblances and belonging. Ethnos, 71(3), 293–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hrdy, S. (1999). Mother nature. A history of Mothers, infants, and natural selection. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  21. Jaakkola, M. (2005). Suomalaisten suhtautuminen maahanmuuttajiin 1987–2003 (Finnish people’s attitudes towards migrants), Työpoliittinen tutkimus 286. Helsinki: Työministeriö.Google Scholar
  22. Jacobson, H. (2008). Culture keeping: White mothers, and the negotiation of family difference. Nashville: Vanderbilt University press.Google Scholar
  23. Jallinoja, R. (2006). Perheen vastaisku. Familistista käännettä jäljittämässä (Tracing the familistic turn). Helsinki: Gaudeamus.Google Scholar
  24. Jerman, H. (2009). Venäläiset tulivat. Tutkija kohtaa median kuvan maahanmuuttajista (The Russians arrived. Researcher facing media representations of immigrants). In S. Keskinen, A. Rastas, & S. Tuori (Eds.), En ole rasisti, mutta…Maahanmuutosta, monikulttuurisuudesta ja kritiikistä (I am not a racist, but…Immigration, multiculturalism and Critique). Tampere: Vastapaino and Nuorisotutkimusverkosto.Google Scholar
  25. Kirk, H. D. (1964). Shared fate. A theory of adoption and mental health. London: The Free Press of Glencoe and Collier-Macmillan.Google Scholar
  26. Marre, D. (2007). ‘I want her to learn her language and maintain her culture’: Transnational adoptive families’ views of ‘cultural origins’. In P. Wade (Ed.), Race, ethnicity and nation: Perspectives from Kinship and genetics. New York/Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  27. Martiskainen de Koenigswarter, H. (2006). Discursive matrixes of motherhood. Cultivating decency and emotion in Finnish and French Mother-Talk (Department of sociology, research reports no. 249). Helsinki: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
  28. Melosh, B. (2002). Strangers and Kin. The American way of adoption. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Modell, J. (1994). Kinship with strangers. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  30. Modell, J. (2002). A sealed and secret kinship. New York/Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  31. Mykkänen, J. & Aalto, I. (2010). Isyyden ihanteet, arki ja kokemukset. Raportti isyyden tutkimuksesta Suomessa (A report on the study of fatherhood in Finland). Verkkojulkaisu 34. Helsinki: Nuorisotutkimusverkosto.Google Scholar
  32. Ong, A. (2006). Neoliberalism as exception: Mutations in citizenship and sovereignity. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Paajanen, P. (2007). Mikä on minun perheeni? Suomalaisten käsityksiä perheestä vuosilta 2007 ja 1997 (Who is my family? Family notions in Finland in 2007 and 1997), Perhebarometri 2007, Katsauksia E 30. Helsinki: Väestöliitto.Google Scholar
  34. Panter-Brick, C. (2000). Nobody’s children? A reconsideration of child abandonment. In C. Panter-Brick & M. T. Smith (Eds.), Abandoned children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Parviainen, H. (2003). Kansainvälinen adoptiotoiminta Suomessa vuosina 1970–2000 (Transnational adoption in Finland 1970–2000), Väestöntutkimuslaitoksen julkaisusarja E 15/2003. Helsinki: Väestöliitto.Google Scholar
  36. Penn, H. (2009). The parenting and substitute parenting of young children. In G. Bentley & R. Mace (Eds.), Substitute parents. New York/Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  37. Pylypa, J. (2011). Socialization for intensive mothering in the single parent, transnationally adoptive family. Journal of the Motherhood Initiative, 2(1), 213–225.Google Scholar
  38. Raleigh, E., & Katz Rothman, B. (2014). Disability is the new black: The rise of the ‘Cleft Lip and palate program’ in transracial international adoption. In V. Bashi Treitler (Ed.), Race in transnational and transracial adoption. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  39. Seligmann, L. J. (2013). Broken links, enduring ties. American adoption across race, class, and nation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Stryker, R. (2010). The Road to Evergreen. Adoption, attachment therapy, and the promise of family. Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Stryker, R. (2013). Movement without movement: ‘RAD kids’ as circulatory problems in United States adoption pipelines. Childhood, 20(3), 337–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Telfer, J. (2000). Pursuing partnerships. Experiences of intercountry adoption in an Australian setting. In P. Selman (Ed.), Intercountry adoption. Developments, trends and perspectives. London: British Agencies for Adoption and Fostering.Google Scholar
  43. Valvira. (2015). (National Supervisory Authority for Welfare and Health). Statistics for Intercountry Adoptions. http://www.valvira.fi/sosiaalihuolto/adoptio. Accessed 12 Oct 2016.Google Scholar
  44. Willing, I., & Fronek, P. (2014). Constructing identities and issues of race in transnational adoption: The experiences of adoptive parents. British Journal of Social Work, 44(5), 1129–1146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yngvesson, B. (2000). Un Nino de Cualquier Color’: Race and nation in inter-country adoption. In J. Jenson & B. De Sousa Santos (Eds.), Globalizing institutions. Aldershot/Burlington/Sydney: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  46. Yngvesson, B. (2002). Placing the “Gift Child” in transnational adoption. Law and Society Review, 36(2), 227–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Younes, M. N., & Klein, S. A. (2014). The international adoption experience: Do they live happily ever after? Adoption Quarterly, 17(1), 65–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Young, A. H. (1998). Reconceiving the family: Challenging the paradigm of the exclusive family. The American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy and the Law, 6(3), 505–555.Google Scholar
  49. Zelizer, V. (1985). Pricing the priceless child. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Riitta Högbacka
    • 1
  1. 1.University of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations