Advertisement

Adoption and Family in the Global North and South

  • Riitta Högbacka
Chapter

Abstract

Högbacka describes the social and cultural structures that influence family life in the Global North and the Global South, and more specifically in Finland and South Africa. She begins with an investigation of the wider adoption system and its legislative basis, and goes on to explicate the socioeconomic contexts of parenting. The chapter also investigates the meanings of family and parental care in the two societies: in order to understand the mothers (and fathers) who were interviewed, it is necessary to explore the cultural norms in the wider society.

Keywords

Black Woman Black Child Child Rear Adoptive Parent Hague Convention 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Adoptiolainsäädännön uudistaminen. (2010). (Renewing adoption legislation). Mi etintöjä ja lausuntoja 84/2010, Oikeusmin isteriö (Ministry of Justice).Google Scholar
  2. Africa’s Orphaned Generations. (2003). New York: UNICEF. http://www.unicef.org/sowc06/pdfs/africas_orphans.pdf. Accessed 12 Oct 2016.
  3. Alexander, P. (2006). Globalisation and new social identities: A jigsaw puzzle from Johannesburg. In P. Alexander, M. Dawson, & M. Ichharam (Eds.), Globalisation and new identities. Johannesburg: Jacana Media.Google Scholar
  4. Allan, G., Crow, G., & Hawker, S. (2011). Stepfamilies. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. BAAF. (2015). British Association for Adoption and Fostering. Statistics for England. http://www.baaf.org.uk/res/statengland. Accessed 12 Oct 2016.Google Scholar
  6. Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). Individualization. London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Blackie, D. (2014). Sad, mad and bad: Exploring child abandonment in South Africa. Master’s Thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Witwaterstrand, March 2014. http://www.adoptioncoalitionsa.org/dbthesis/. Accessed 12 Oct 2016.
  8. Bond, P. (2006). Looting Africa. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  9. Bower, C. (2014). The plight of women and children: Advancing South Africa’s least privileged. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 652(1), 106–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cantwell, N. (2003). Intercountry adoption. A comment on the number of ‘Adoptable’ children and the number of Persons seeking to adopt internationally. The Judge’s Newsletter, V(Spring 2003). A publication of the Hague Conference on Private International Law.Google Scholar
  11. Cantwell, N. (2014). The best interests of the child in intercountry adoption. Florence: Innocenti Insight and UNICEF Office of Research. https://www.unicefirc.org/publications/712/. Accessed 12 Oct 2016.
  12. Castrén, A. (2009). Onko perhettä eron jälkeen? (Is there family after separation?). Helsinki: Gaudeamus.Google Scholar
  13. Castrén, A., & Högbacka, R. (2014). Avautuuko perhe? Eksklusiivisuuden ja inklusiivisuuden dynamiikka perhesidoksissa’ (The dynamics between exclusivity and inclusivity in familial ties). Sosiologia (Finnish Journal of Sociology), 51(2), 102–118.Google Scholar
  14. Chavkin, W. (2010). The globalization of motherhood. In W. Chavkin & J. Maher (Eds.), The globalization of motherhood. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Craig, L. (2007). Contemporary Motherhood: The Impact of Children on Adult Time. Aldershot: AshgateGoogle Scholar
  16. Coutin, S. B., Maurer, B., & Yngvesson, B. (2002). In the mirror: The legitimation work of globalization. Law and Social Inquiry, 27(4), 801–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. De Graeve, K. (2012). Making families. Parenting and belonging in transnational adoption in Flanders. PhD Thesis, Comparative Sciences of Culture, Gent University, Belgium.Google Scholar
  18. Department of Women, Children and People with Disabilities. (2013). South Africa’s initial country report on the African charter on the rights and welfare of the child. Republic of South Africa, RP181/2013, Pretoria, http://www.unicef.org/southafrica/SAF_resources_africanunionreport9.pdf. Accessed 20 Oct 2015.
  19. Dickens, J. (2012). Social policy approaches and social work dilemmas in intercountry adoption. In J. L. Gibbons & R. S. Rotabi (Eds.), Intercountry adoption: Policies, practices, and outcomes. Farnham/Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  20. Eydal, G., & Kröger, T. (2010). Nordic family policies: Constructing contexts for social work. In H. Forsberg & T. Kröger (Eds.), Social work and child welfare politics: Through Nordic lenses. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  21. Finlex. (2012). Adoptiolaki 22/2012 (Finnish adoption law). http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/alkup/2012/20120022?search%5Btype%5D=pika&search%5Bpika%5D=adoptio. Accessed 12 Oct 2016.
  22. Fonseca, C. (2011). The de-kinning of birthmothers – Reflections on maternity and being human. Vibrant, 8(2), 307–339.Google Scholar
  23. Gailey, C. W. (2010). Blue-ribbon babies and labours of love: Race, class, and gender in U.S. adoption practice. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  24. Garrett, P. M., & Sinkkonen, J. (2003). Putting children first? A comparison of child adoption policy and practice in Britain and Finland. European Journal of Social Work, 6(1), 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gerrand, P., & Nathane-Taulela, M. (2015). Developing a culturally relevant adoption model in South Africa. International Social Work, 58(1), 55–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Goldthorpe, J. (1987). Family life in Western societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Goody, E. (1982). Parenthood and social reproduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Grant, M., & Yeatman, S. (2012). The relationship between orphanhood and child fostering in sub-Saharan Africa 1990s–2000s. Population Studies, 66(3), 279–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gustafson, D. (2005). The social construction of maternal absence. In D. Gustafson (Ed.), Unbecoming mothers. New York/London/Oxford: The Hayworth Clinical Practice Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hall, K., & Sambu, W. (2014). Income poverty, unemployment and social grants. In S. Mathews, L. Jamieson, L. Lake, & C. Smith (Eds.), South African Child Gauge 2014. Cape Town: Children’s Institute, University of Cape Town. http://www.ci.org.za/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1122&Itemid=697. Accessed 12 Oct 2016.
  31. Hall, K., Meintjes, H., & Sambu, W. (2014). Demography of South Africa’s children. In S. Mathews, L. Jamieson, L. Lake, & C. Smith (Eds.), South African Child Gauge 2014. Cape Town: Children’s Institute, University of Cape Town. http://www.ci.org.za/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1122&Itemid=697. Accessed 12 Oct 2016.
  32. Harrikari, K., & Satka, M. (2006). A new regime of governing childhood? Finland as an example. Social Work and Society, 4(2), 209–216.Google Scholar
  33. Hart, G. (2002). Disabling globalization. Places of power in post-apartheid South Africa. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  34. Hart, G. (2008). The provocations of neoliberalism: Contesting the nation and liberation after apartheid. Antipode, 40(4), 678–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Harvey, D. (2006). Spaces of global capitalism. London/New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  36. Hays, S. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  37. HCCH. (1993). Hague convention on protection of children and co-operation in respect of intercountry adoption. https://assets.hcch.net/docs/77e12f23-d3dc-4851-8f0b-050f71a16947.pdf. Accessed 12 Oct 2016.
  38. Hiilamo, H. (2009). What could explain the dramatic rise in out-of-home placement in Finland in the 1990s and early 2000s? Children and Youth Services Review, 31(2), 177–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. IOM. (2013). International organization for migration: The well-being of economic migrants in South Africa: Health, gender and development. Working paper for the world migration report 2013. https://www.iom.int/files/live/sites/iom/files/What-We-Do/wmr2013/en/Working-Paper_SouthAfrica.pdf. Accessed 12 Oct 2016.
  40. Kela. (2015). The Social Insurance Institution of Finland. Information, http://www.kela.fi/web/en/adoption?inheritRedirect=true. Accessed 12 Oct 2016.
  41. Keller, H. (2007). Cultures of infancy. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  42. King, S. (2008/2009). Challenging monohumanism: An argument for changing the way we think about intercountry adoption. Michigan Journal of International Law, 30(Winter), 413–470.Google Scholar
  43. Lancy, D. (2012). Unmasking children’s agency. AnthropoChildren, 1(2), 1–20, http://popups.ulg.ac.be/AnthropoChildren/document.php?id=1253. Accessed 12 Oct 2016.
  44. Laslett, P. (1972). The history of the family. In P. Laslett & R. Wall (Eds.), Household and family in past times. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lastensuojelu. – Barnskydd – Child welfare. (2013). Tilastoraportti 26/2014. Suomen virallinen tilasto, Lastensuojelu, http://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/116946/Tr26_14.pdf?sequence=5. Accessed 12 Oct 2016.
  46. Lee, R. (2009). African women and apartheid. Migration and settlement in urban South Africa. London/New York: I. B. Tauris Publishers.Google Scholar
  47. LeVine, R. A. (2004). Challenging expert knowledge: Findings from an African study of infant care and development. In U. P. Gielen & J. L. Roopnarine (Eds.), Childhood and adolescence: Cross-cultural perspectives and applications. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  48. Lund, F. (2006). Gender and social security in South Africa. In V. Padayachee (Ed.), The development decade? Economic and social change in South Africa 1994–2004. Cape Town: Human Sciences Research Council.Google Scholar
  49. Mattinen, K. (2009). Avoin adoptio Pelastakaa Lapset RY: ssä (open adoption in Save the Children Finland). Esitelmä adoptiolain muutosta pohtineen työryhmän kokouksessa. Paper presented at the adoption law working group meeting, Helsinki 30 October 2009.Google Scholar
  50. MIA. (2015). (The Swedish Intercountry Adoptions Authority). Adoption statistics for Sweden. www.mia.eu/Global/English/Statistics/totals.pdf. Accessed 12 Oct 2016.
  51. Miettinen, A., & Rotkirch, A. (2008). Milloin on lapsen aika? Lastenhankinnan toiveet ja esteet (When to have children? Reproductive wishes and obstacles), Perhebarometri 2008, Väestöntutkimuslaitoksen Katsauksia E34. Helsinki: Väestöliitto.Google Scholar
  52. Mkhize, N. (2006). African traditions and the social, economic and moral dimensions of fatherhood. In L. Richter & R. Morrell (Eds.), Baba: Men and fatherhood in South Africa. Cape Town: HSRC Press.Google Scholar
  53. Mokomane, Z., & Rochat, T. (2010). The perceptions, understandings and beliefs of people towards adoption and blockages which prevent communities from adopting children in South Africa. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.Google Scholar
  54. Mokomane, Z., Rochat, T., & The Directorate. (2012). Adoption in South Africa: Trends and patterns in social work practice. Child and Family Social Work, 17(3), 347–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Moore, E. (2013). Transmission and change in South African motherhood: Black mothers in three-generational Cape Town families. Journal of Southern African Studies, 39(1), 151–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mäkipää, S. (2006). Mistä on adoptioperheet tehty? Vanhemmuuden ammatillinen rakentaminen adoptioneuvontaa ohjaavassa tekstissä (What are adoptive families made off? The professional construction of parenthood in the text guiding adoption counselling). In K. Komulainen, H. Räty, & J. Silvonen (Eds.), Hulluudesta itsehallintaan. Uuden historian näkökulmia psyykkisiin ilmiöihin ja ammatikäytäntöihin (From madness to selfdiscipline. Perspectives of new history on psychological phenomena and professional practices), Psykologian tutkimuksia Nro 25,Yhteiskunta - ja aluetieteiden tiedekunta. Joensuun yliopisto.Google Scholar
  57. National Adoptions Register. (2016). Statistics obtained at request from adoptions and international services, National Department of Social Development, Pretoria, South Africa.Google Scholar
  58. OECD Factbook. (2014). http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/economics/oecd-factbook-2014_factbook-2014-en#.V_4S9OCLTIU#page66. Accessed 12 Oct 2016..Google Scholar
  59. Opas adoptioneuvonnan antajille. (2013). A handbook for providers of adoption counselling (Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriön julkaisuja 21). Helsinki: Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriö.Google Scholar
  60. Oyewumi, O. (2000). Family bonds/conceptual binds: African notes on feminist epistemologies. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 25(4), 1093–1098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Panter-Brick, C. (2000). Nobody’s children? A reconsideration of child abandonment. In C. Panter-Brick & M. T. Smith (Eds.), Abandoned children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Partanen, P., Pasanen, K., Reinikainen, H., & Tervonen-Arnkil, K. (Eds.). (2013). Avoimuutta ja yhteyksiä – kotimainen adoptio muutoksessa (Changes in domestic adoptions). Helsinki: Pelastakaa Lapset – Save the Children.Google Scholar
  63. Parviainen, H. (2003). Kansainvälinen adoptiotoiminta Suomessa vuosina 1970–2000 (Transnational adoption in Finland 1970–2000), Väestöntutkimuslaitoksen julkaisusarja E 15/2003. Helsinki: Väestöliitto.Google Scholar
  64. Pasanen, K., & Tervonen-Arnkil, K. (2013). Avoimuutta adoptioon – yhteys voi säilyä’ (More openness to adoption – connections can be maintained). In P. Timonen (Ed.), Adoptio – lapsen etu? (Adoption – in the best interests of the child?). Helsinki: Lastensuojelun Keskusliitto.Google Scholar
  65. Penn, H. (1999). How should we care for babies and toddlers? An analysis of practice in out-of-home care for children under three. Childcare Resource and Research Unit, Centre for Urban and Community Studies, Occasional Paper 10. http://www.childcarecanada.org/sites/default/files/op10.pdf. Accessed 12 Oct 2016.Google Scholar
  66. Penn, H. (2009). The parenting and substitute parenting of young children. In G. Bentley & R. Mace (Eds.), Substitute parents. New York/Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  67. Population Reference Bureau: World Population Data Sheet. (2014). http://www.prb.org/pdf14/2014-world-population-data-sheet_eng.pdf. Accessed 12 Oct 2016.
  68. Posel, D., Rudwick, S., & Casale, D. (2011). Is marriage a dying institution in South Africa? Exploring changes in marriage in the context of ilobolo payments. Agenda: Empowering Women for Gender Equity, 25(1), 102–111.Google Scholar
  69. Posel, D., Casale, D., & Vermaak, C. (2013). What is South Africa’s ‘real’ unemployment rate. http://www.politicsweb.co.za/politicsweb/view/politicsweb/en/page71639/page71639?oid=363205&sn=Detail&pid=71639. Accessed 12 Oct 2016.
  70. Power, J., Perlesz, A., Brown, R., Schofield, M., Pitts, M., McNair, R., & Bickerdike, A. (2010). Diversity, tradition and family: Australian same-sex attracted parents and their families. Gay and Lesbian Issues and Psychology Review, 6(2), 66–81.Google Scholar
  71. Pringle, R. (2004). Adoption in Britain: Reflexive Modernity? Australian Feminist Studies, 19(44): 224–240.Google Scholar
  72. Pulma, P., & Turpeinen, O. (1987). Suomen lastensuojelun historia (A history of Finnish child welfare). Helsinki: Lastensuojelun Keskusliitto.Google Scholar
  73. Pylypa, J. (2011). Socialization for intensive mothering in the single parent, transnationally adoptive family. Journal of the Motherhood Initiative, 2(1), 213–225.Google Scholar
  74. RACAP. (2016). Statistics obtained at request from adoptions and international services. National Department of Social Development, Pretoria, South Africa.Google Scholar
  75. Raleigh, E., & Katz Rothman, B. (2014). Disability is the new black: The rise of the ‘Cleft Lip and palate program’ in transracial international adoption. In V. Bashi Treitler (Ed.), Race in transnational and transracial adoption. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  76. Ramphele, M., & Richter, L. (2006). Migrancy, family dissolution and fatherhood. In L. Richter & R. Morrell (Eds.), Baba. Men and fatherhood in South Africa. Cape Town: HSRC Press.Google Scholar
  77. Rautanen, E. (1975). Kansainväliset adoptiot (International adoptions). Oikeusministeriön lainsäädäntöosaston julkaisu 18. Helsinki: Oikeusministeriön lainsäädäntöosasto.Google Scholar
  78. Richey, L. A. (2011). Antiviral but Pronatal? ARVs and reproductive health. A view from a South African township. In C. H. Browner & C. F. Sargent (Eds.), Reproduction, globalization, and the state. New theoretical and ethnographic perspectives. Durham/London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Roberts, D. (2006). Adoption myths and racial realities in the United States. In J. J. Trenka, J. C. Oparah, & S. Y. Shin (Eds.), Outsiders within. Writing on transracial adoption. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.Google Scholar
  80. Ross, F. C. (1995). Houses without Doors. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.Google Scholar
  81. Ross, F. C. (2010). Raw life, new hope. Decency, housing and everyday life in a post-apartheid community. Claremont: UCT Press.Google Scholar
  82. Russell, M. (2003). Understanding black households: The problem. Social Dynamics, 29(2), 5–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Saclier, C. (2000). In the best interests of the child? In P. Selman (Ed.), Intercountry adoption. Developments, trends and perspectives. London: British Agencies for Adoption and Fostering.Google Scholar
  84. SAIRR. (2006). South Africa Survey 2004/2005, Johannesburg: South African Institute of Race Relations.Google Scholar
  85. SAPS. (2010/2011). South African Police Service: Crime report. http://pmg-assets.s3-website-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/docs/110908crimestats2011.pdf. Accessed 12 Oct 2016.
  86. Saul, J. (2002). Cry for the Beloved Country: the Post-Apartheid Denouement. In S. Jacobs and R. Calland (Eds.), Thabo Mbeki’s World: the Politics and Ideology of the South African President. Pietermaritzburg: University of Natal Press.Google Scholar
  87. Seekings, J. (2008). Beyond fluidity: Kinship and households as social projects, CSSR working paper no. 237. Cape Town: Centre for Social Science Research, University of Cape Town.Google Scholar
  88. Seekings, J. (2009). Measuring the gendered consequences of AIDS: Household dynamics and poverty in South Africa. In J. F. Klot, & V. K. Nguyen (Eds.), The fourth wave: Violence, gender, culture and HIV in the 21st century. New York: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  89. Seekings, J., & Moore, E. (2013). Kin, market and state in the provision of care in South Africa. CSSR working paper no. 327. Cape Town: Centre for Social Science Research, University of Cape Town.Google Scholar
  90. Seekings, J., & Nattrass, N. (2006). Class, race, and inequality in South Africa. South Africa: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press.Google Scholar
  91. Selman, P. (2015b). Africa: The ‘new frontier’ in international adoption. Paper presented at 2015 SPA conference, Belfast, Ireland (updated 24 October 2015). Available from the author at pfselman@yahoo.co.ukGoogle Scholar
  92. Selman, P. (2016a). Global Statistics for Intercountry Adoption: Receiving States and States of origin 2004-2015. Available at HCCH Adoption Section - Annual adoption statistics. https://assets.hcch.net/docs/3bead31e-6234-44ae-9f4e-2352b190ca21.pdf. Accessed 12 Oct 2016Google Scholar
  93. Selman, P. (2016b). International Adoptions from Africa 2003-2014. Available on request from the author at pfselman@yahoo.co.ukGoogle Scholar
  94. Smolin, D. (2007). Intercountry adoption and poverty: A human rights analysis. Capital Law Review, 36(2), 413–453.Google Scholar
  95. South African Children’s Act 38 of 2005. http://www.justice.gov.za/legislation/acts/2005-038%20childrensact.pdf. Accessed 12 Oct 2016.
  96. South African Government Info. (2014). http://www.gov.za/services/services-residents/social-benefits. Accessed 12 Oct 2016.
  97. Statistics Finland. (2011). Calculations of numbers of children living in different family types. Provided at request by Statistics Finland.Google Scholar
  98. Statistics Finland: Births. (2013). http://www.stat.fi/til/synt/2013/synt_2013_2014-04-08_tie_001_en.html. Accessed 12 Oct 2016.
  99. Statistics Finland: Families. (2014). http://www.stat.fi/til/perh/2014/perh_2014_2015-05-28_tau_004_fi.html. Accessed 12 Oct 2016.
  100. Statistics Finland: Finland in Figures. (2014). http://www.stat.fi/tup/suoluk/index_en.html. Accessed 12 Oct 2016.
  101. Statistics Finland: Life Expectancy. (2014). http://www.stat.fi/til/kuol/2013/01/kuol_2013_01_2014-10-24_tie_001_en.html. Accessed 12 Oct 2016.
  102. Statistics Norway: Adoptions. (2014). www.ssb.no/en/befolkning/statistikker/adopsjon/aar/2015-06-04. Accessed 12 Oct 2016.
  103. Statistics South Africa: Mid-year Population Estimates. (2014). Statistical release P0302. http://beta2.statssa.gov.za/publications/P0302/P03022014.pdf. Accessed 12 Oct 2016.
  104. Statistics South Africa: Population Census. (2011). http://www.statssa.gov.za/publications/P03014/P030142011.pdf. Accessed 10 Dec 2015.
  105. Statistics South Africa: Quarterly Labour Force Survey. (2014). Statistical release P0211. http://beta2.statssa.gov.za/publications/P0211/P02113rdQuarter2014.pdf. Accessed 12 Oct 2016.
  106. Statistics South Africa: Recorded Live Births. (2013). Statistical release P0305. http://www.statssa.gov.za/publications/P0305/P03052013.pdf. Accessed 12 Oct 2016.Google Scholar
  107. Statistics South Africa: Social Profile of Vulnerable Groups in South Africa. (2002–2011). http://www.statssa.gov.za/publications/Report-03-19-00/Report-03-19-002011.pdf. Accessed 12 Oct 2016.
  108. Stryker, R. (2010). The Road to Evergreen. Adoption, attachment therapy, and the promise of family. Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  109. Stryker, R. (2013). Movement without movement: ‘RAD kids’ as circulatory problems in United States adoption pipelines. Childhood, 20(3), 337–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Swartz, L. (2003). Fertility transition in South Africa and its impact on the four major racial groups. In Fertility. Current South African issues of poverty, HIV/AIDS and youth. Seminar proceedings. Cape Town: Human Sciences Research Council and Department of Social Development.Google Scholar
  111. Therborn, G. (2004). Between sex and power. Family in the World, 1900–2000. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  112. Therborn, G. (2006). African families in a global context. In G. Therborn (Ed.), African families in a global context. Uppsala: Nordiska Afrikainstitutet.Google Scholar
  113. Therborn, G. (2013). The killing fields of inequality. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  114. Thomas, A., & Mabusela, S. (1991). Foster care in Soweto, South Africa: Under assault from a politically hostile environment. Child Welfare, 70(2), 121–130.Google Scholar
  115. United Nations: Abortion Policies and Reproductive Health around the World. (2014). http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/policy/AbortionPoliciesReproductiveHealth.pdf. Accessed 6 Oct 2016.
  116. United Nations: Human Development Report. (2014). http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/hdr14-report-en-1.pdf. Accessed 12 Oct 2016.
  117. U.S. Children’s Bureau. (2013). (Department of Health and Human Services): Statistics. http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/research-data-technology/statistics-research. Accessed 8 Oct 2015.
  118. 2015.Valvira. (2015). (National Supervisory Authority for Welfare and Health). Statistics for Intercountry Adoptions. http://www.valvira.fi/sosiaalihuolto/adoptio. Accessed 12 Oct 2016.
  119. van deer Berg, S. (2014). Inequality, poverty and prospects for redistribution. Development Southern Africa, 31(2), 197–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Walker, C. (1995). Conceptualising motherhood in twentieth century South Africa. Journal of Southern African Studies, 12(3), 417–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. WHO: World Health Statistics. (2014). http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/112738/1/9789240692671_eng.pdf. Accessed 12 Oct 2016.
  122. Yngvesson, B. (2002). Placing the “Gift Child” in transnational adoption. Law and Society Review, 36(2), 227–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Yngvesson, B. (2003). Going “Home”. Adoption, loss of bearings, and the mythology of roots. Social Text, 74, 21(1), 7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Yngvesson, B. (2004). National bodies and the body of the child. ‘Completing’ families through international adoption. In F. Bowie (Ed.), Cross-cultural approaches to adoption. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  125. Yngvesson, B. (2010). Belonging in an adopted world. Race, identity, and transnational adoption. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Young, A. H. (1998). Reconceiving the family: Challenging the paradigm of the exclusive family. The American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy and the Law, 6(3), 505–555.Google Scholar
  127. Zelizer, V. (1985). Pricing the priceless child. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Riitta Högbacka
    • 1
  1. 1.University of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations