Abstract
In this book, I have sought to provide a comprehensive, empirically grounded account of the collaborative creation of scientific knowledge in research groups. I hope to have contributed to a detailed understanding of the collective character of science, an understanding that reflects actual scientific practice and the perspectives of practicing scientists.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Foley, R. (1994). Egoism in epistemology. In F. F. Schmitt (Ed.), Socializing epistemology: The social dimensions of knowledge (pp. 53–73). Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
Fricker, E. (2006). Testimony and epistemic autonomy. In J. Lackey & E. Sosa (Eds.), The epistemology of testimony (pp. 225–250). Oxford: Clarendon.
Grasswick, H. E. (2004). Individuals-in-communities: The search for a feminist model of epistemic subjects. Hypatia, 19(3), 85–120.
Hardwig, J. (1985). Epistemic dependence. The Journal of Philosophy, 82(7), 335–349.
Hardwig, J. (1991). The role of trust in knowledge. The Journal of Philosophy, 88(12), 693–708.
Kusch, M. (2002). Knowledge by agreement: The programme of communitarian epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nelson, L. H. (1995). A feminist naturalized philosophy of science. Synthese, 104(3), 399–421.
Rouse, J. (2002). How scientific practices matter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Schleidgen, S., Jungert, M. C., & Bauer, R. H. (2010). Mission: Impossible? on empirical-normative collaboration in ethical reasoning. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 13(1), 59–71.
Soler, L., Zwart, S., Lynch, M., & Israel-Jost, V. (Eds.). (2014). Science after the practice turn in the philosophy, history and social studies of science. New York: Routledge.
Streumer, B. (2003). Does “ought” conversationally implicate “can”? European Journal of Philosophy, 11(2), 219–228.
Vranas, P. B. (2007). I ought, therefore I can. Philosophical Studies, 136(2), 167–216.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wagenknecht, S. (2016). Concluding Remarks. In: A Social Epistemology of Research Groups. New Directions in the Philosophy of Science. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52410-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52410-2_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-52409-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-52410-2
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)