Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Critical Event Studies pp 175–192Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan

Examining Parasport Events Through the Lens of Critical Disability Studies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Leisure Studies in a Global Era ((LSGE))

Abstract

It has been generally understood that parasport (disability sport) events aim to alter perceptions towards disability and change attitudes about the potential of disability sport. However, given the complexity of understanding attitudes, perceptions, and awareness, it is necessary to employ multiple overlapping methods to critically examine the various social, economic, and infrastructural arrangements that affect accessibility, mobility, and access to resources. Moreover, event researchers often focus on the here and now rather than assess the longer-term impact or legacy on a range of stakeholders. From this perspective, mixing qualitative ethnographic approaches and quantitative statistical measures offers a way to interrogate social values, institutional priorities, and political will for social change, over a longer time period.

In this chapter, we discuss the complexity of such an approach from our work examining large-scale sporting events and parasport legacies. Our cases are the 2014 Commonwealth Games (Glasgow, Scotland) and the 2015 Pan/Para-pan American Games (Toronto, Ontario, Canada). These events were chosen due to their similarity in size and scale, and because they represent unique cases regarding integrated (Commonwealth Games) and non-integrated (Pan/Para-pan American Games) events. Additionally, each of the cities set to host the respective Games has established specific objectives in relation to increasing accessibility and advancing social inclusion in the host region for persons with a disability. For each case, we have employed exploratory multiple case study designs using ethnographic interviews, document analyses, media analyses, and direct observations, all informed by the lived experiences of persons with disability. In this chapter, we discuss the nuances of a mixed methods approach with particular focus on the role of critical disability theory that challenges ableist assumptions often embedded in social research designs. We pay careful attention to the intricacies and peculiarities of such a complex approach with the aim of storying the research experience and the research process in order to challenge researchers to see the social value in the complexity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barnes, C. (2003). What a difference a decade makes: Reflections on doing ‘emancipatory’ disability research. Disability & Society, 18(1), 3–17. doi:10.1080/713662197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, C. & Mercer, G. (2005). Disability, work, and welfare: Challenging the social exclusion of disabled people. Work, Employment & Society, 19(3), 527–545. doi:10.1177/0950017005055669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, F. K. (2009). Contours of ableism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, M., Mason, D. S., & Misener, L. (2011). Social responsibility and the competitive bid process for major sporting events. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 35(3), 246–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cashman, R. & Darcy, S. (2008). Benchmark games: The Sydney 2000 Paralympic Games. Petersham, NSW Australia: Walla Walla Press in conjunction with the Australian Centre for Olympic Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cashman, R., Toohey, K., Darcy, S., Symons, C., & Stewart, B. (2004). When the carnival is over : Evaluating the outcomes of mega sporting events in Australia. Sporting Traditions, 21(1), 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, A. (1996). Knowledge, power and the disability discrimination bill. Disability & Society, 11(1), 25–40. doi:10.1080/09687599650023308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalip, L. (2014). From legacy to leverage. In J. Grix (Ed.), Leveraging legacies from Mega Events. Concepts and cases (pp. 2–12). Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chalip, L. (2004). Beyond impact: A general model for sport event leverage. In B. W. Ritchie & D. Adair (Eds.), Sport tourism: Interrelationships, impacts and issues (pp. 226–252). Clevedon, UK: Channelview.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePauw, K. P. (1997). The (In)visibility of DisAbility: Cultural contexts and ‘sporting bodies’. Quest, 49(4), 416–430. doi:10.1080/00336297.1997.10484258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DePauw, K. P. (2000). Social-cultural context of disability: Implications for scientific inquiry and professional preparation. Quest, 52(4), 358–368. doi:10.1080/00336297.2000.10491723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devlin, R. & Pothier, D. (2006). Critical disability theory: Essays in philosophy, politics, policy, and law. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, T. J., Benson, A. M., & Blackman, D. A. (2011). Developing a framework for evaluating Olympic and Paralympic legacies. Journal of Sport & Tourism, 16(4), 285–302. doi:10.1080/14775085.2011.635014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, L., Forsyth, P., & Spurr, R. (2005). Estimating the impacts of special events on an economy. Journal of Travel Research, 43(4), 351–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foley, M., McGillivray, D., & McPherson, G. (2011). Event policy: From theory to strategy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gratton, C. & Preuss, H. (2008). Maximizing Olympic impacts by building up legacies. International Journal of the History of Sport, 25(14), 1922–1938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grix, J. (2012). ‘Image’ leveraging and sports mega-events: Germany and the 2006 FIFA World Cup. Journal of Sport & Tourism, 17(4), 289–312. doi:10.1080/14775085.2012.760934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiller, H. H. & Wanner, R. A. (2011). Public opinion in host Olympic Cities: The case of the 2010 Vancouver Winter Games. Sociology, 45(5), 883–899. doi:10.1177/0038038511413414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horne, J. & Manzenreiter, W. (2006). An introduction to the sociology of sports mega-events. The sociological review. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Inc.. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2006.00650.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, D. (2008). The cultural politics of the paralympic movement. Routledge critical studies in sport. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. (2001a). A level playing field? Sports stadium infrastructure and urban development in the United Kingdom. Environment and Planning, 33(5), 845–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. (2001b). Mega-events and host-region impacts: Determining the true worth of the 1999 Rugby World Cup. International Journal of Tourism Research, 3(3), 241–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplanidou, K., Karadakis, K., Gibson, H., Thapa, B., Walker, M., Geldenhuys, S., et al. (2013). Quality of life, event impacts, and mega-event support among South African Residents before and after the 2010 FIFA World Cup. Journal of Travel Research, 52(5), 631–645. doi:10.1177/0047287513478501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Clair, J. M. (2011). Global organizational change in sport and the shifting meaning of disability. Sport in Society, 14(9), 1072–1093. doi:10.1080/17430437.2011.614765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legg, D. & Gilbert, K. (2011). Paralympic legacies. Sport and society. Champaign, Ill.: Common Ground Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misener, L. (2015). Leveraging parasport events for community participation: Development of a theoretical framework. European Sport Management Quarterly, 15, 132–153. doi:10.1080/16184742.2014.997773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misener, L., Darcy, S., Legg, D., & Gilbert, K. (2013). Beyond Olympic legacy : Understanding Paralympic legacy through a thematic analysis. Journal of Sport Management, 27, 329–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misener, L. & Mason, D. (2006). Developing local citizenship through sporting events: Balancing community involvement and tourism development. Current Issues in Tourism, 9(4), 384–398. doi:10.2167/cit263.0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misener, L. & Mason, D. S. (2008). Urban regimes and the sporting events agenda: A cross national comparison of civic development strategies. Journal of Sport Management, 22, 603–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misener, L. & Mason, D. S. (2009). Fostering community development through sporting events strategies: An examination of urban regime perceptions. Journal of Sport Management, 23(6), 770–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misener, L. & Mason, D. S. (2010). Towards a community centred approach to corporate community involvement in the sporting. Journal of Management & Organization, 16(4), 495–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, D. & Chalip, L. (2007). Executive training exercise in sport event leverage. International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research, 1(4), 296–304. doi:10.1108/17506180710824181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preuss, H. (2005). The economic impact of visitors at major multi-sport events. European Sport Management Quarterly, 5(3), 281–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prince, M. J. (2004). Disability, disability studies and citizenship: Moving up or off the sociological agenda? Canadian Journal of Sociology, 29(3), 459–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramchandani, G. M. (2012). The inspirational effects of three major sport events. International Journal of Event and Festival Management, 3(3), 257–271. doi:10.1108/17582951211262693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, D. & McGuirk, P. (1999). Drunk for three weeks: Sporting success and city image. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 34(2), 125–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, D. R. & Pitts, B. G. (2014). What little do we know: Content analysis of disability sport in sport management literature. Journal of Sport Management, 28(6), 657–671. doi:10.1123/JSM.2013-0258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taks, M., Green, B. C., Misener, L., & Chalip, L. (2014). Evaluating sport development outcomes: The case of a medium-sized international sport event. European Sport Management Quarterly, 14(3), 213–237. doi:10.1080/16184742.2014.882370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, C. (2004). How is disability understood? An examination of sociological approaches. Disability & Society, 19(6), 569–583. doi:10.1080/0968759042000252506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, K. (2003). Entrepreneurial urbanism, state restructuring and civilizing ‘new’ east Manchester. Area, 35(2), 116–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weed, M. & Dowse, S. (2009). A missed opportunity waiting to happen? The social legacy potential of the London 2012 Paralympic Games. Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events, 1(2), 170–174. doi: 10.1080/19407960902992241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2008). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziakas, V. (2014). For the benefit of all? Developing a critical perspective in mega-event leverage. Leisure Studies. doi:10.1080/02614367.2014.986507.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ■, ■, UK

    Laura Misener, David McGillivray, Gayle McPherson & David Legg

Authors
  1. Laura Misener
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David McGillivray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gayle McPherson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. David Legg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Events, Tourism and Hospitality, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, United Kingdom

    Ian R Lamond

  2. Hollings Faculty, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom

    Louise Platt

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Misener, L., McGillivray, D., McPherson, G., Legg, D. (2016). Examining Parasport Events Through the Lens of Critical Disability Studies. In: R Lamond, I., Platt, L. (eds) Critical Event Studies. Leisure Studies in a Global Era. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52386-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52386-0_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-52384-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-52386-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation