Abstract
Within the study and analysis of events empirical research provides a means of testing and developing theory; however, the appropriateness of some of the methodologies adopted has been contested in the event studies literature. For example, case studies are widely recognised in the political sciences as a means of studying complex or infrequent phenomena, but this approach has been criticised for being, inter alia, unmanageable and producing ungeneralisable results (Garrod, B., & Fyall, A. (2013). The case study approach: Academic pariah or wrongly maligned? In B. Garrod & A. Fyall (Eds.), Contemporary cases in sport: Volume 1 (pp. 1–8). Oxford: Goodfellows). There is also ongoing concern in discussions of qualitative investigation regarding the effect of an inside or outside position on the researcher’s ability to obtain and appropriately interpret data (Sabot, Geoforum, 30: 329–335, 1999; Weinreb, American Sociological Review, 71:1014–1039, 2006). Understanding the challenges and opportunities inherent in these approaches is therefore important, but present the researcher with a host of practical considerations and private dilemmas. This chapter explores these issues drawing on personal experience of conducting a case study of a mega-event that included fieldwork in a foreign country. The research findings illuminate the value of qualitative research in developing a nuanced understanding of the specific context(s) that influence complex social events, while the experience itself highlighted how personal insider and outsider statuses may influence the research process (Rainbird, H. (1990). Expectations and reflections: Examining conflict in the Andes. In R. Burgess (Ed.), Studies in qualitative methodologies (Vol. 2, pp. 77–98)). By sharing these insights and also reflecting on the rhetorical question (to paraphrase Wolcott, Methodological Developments in Ethnography, 12:27–33, 2007) ‘what kind of story is a South African willing to tell a British researcher’ the purpose of this paper is to support the conduct of fieldwork within qualitative research ‘communities’. Towards these ends, the discussion begins with a brief outline of the PhD project that provides the basis of the experiences shared in order to provide a context for the information presented. It then considers issues concerning qualitative data collection that are debated in the literature and how they were personally interpreted, experienced, and rationalised. The discussion concludes by reflecting on how the challenges inherent in the conduct of empirical field work should not discourage qualitative methodologies that have an irreplaceable role in the conduct of social research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agar, M. (1996). The professional stranger: An informal introduction to ethnography. San Diego CA: Academic Press.
Atkinson, R. & Flint, J. (2001) Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations: Snowball research strategies. Social Research Update, 33 (Summer). Retrieved January 19, 2012, from http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU33.pdf.
Beacom, A. (2000). Sport in international relations: A case for cross-disciplinary investigation. The Sport Historian, 20(2), 1–23.
Bennett, A. & Elman, C. (2008). Case study methods. In C. Reus-Smit & D. Snidal (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of international relations (pp. 498–517). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Black, D. (2008). Dreaming big: The pursuit of ‘second order’ games as a strategic response to globalisation. Sport in Society, 11(4), 467–480.
Black, D. & Van der Westhuizen, J. (2004). The allure of global games for ‘semi-peripheral’ polities and spaces: A research agenda. Third World Quarterly, 25(7), 1195–1214.
Burnham, P., Gilland Lutz, K., Grant, W., & Layton-Henry, Z. (2008). Research methods in politics (2nd ed.). Houndsmill: Palgrave Macmillian.
Chalip, L. (2006). Towards social leverage of sports events. Journal of Sport & Tourism, 11(2), 109–127.
Cotterill, P. (1992). Interviewing women: Issues of friendship, vulnerability, and power. Women’s Studies International Forum, 15(5/6), 593–606.
Cornelissen, S. (2004). Sport mega events in Africa: Processes, impacts and prospects. Tourism and Hospitality Planning & Development, 1(1), 39–55.
de Nooij, M., van den Berg, M., & Koopmans, C. (2010) Bread or games? Social cost-benefit analysis of the World Cup in The Netherlands. Discussion paper no. 60: SEO Economic Research: Amsterdam. Retrieved March 05, 2011, from http://www.seo.nl/en/page/article/bread-or-games/.
Denzin, N. & Lincoln, Y. (2011). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research: 4. London: Sage.
Garrod, B. & Fyall, A. (2013). The case study approach: Academic pariah or wrongly maligned? In B. Garrod & A. Fyall (Eds.), Contemporary cases in sport: Volume 1 (pp. 1–8). Oxford: Goodfellows.
Harrison, L. (2001). Political research: An introduction. London: Routledge.
Herod, A. (1999). Reflections on interviewing foreign elites: Praxis, positionality, validity, and the cult of the insider. Geoforum, 30(313), 27.
Jordaan, E. (2003). The concept of a middle power in international relations: Distinguishing between emerging and traditional middle powers. Politikon, 30(2), 165–181.
Matheson, V. & Baade, R. (2004). Mega-sporting events in developing nations: Playing the way to prosperity? The South African Journal of Economics, 72(5), 1085–1095.
Mikecz, R. (2012). Interviewing elites: Addressing methodological issues. Qualitative Inquiry, 18, 482–493.
Noy, C. (2008). Sampling knowledge: The hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. International Journal of Research Methodology, 11(4), 327–344.
Parsons, C. (2010). Constructivism and interpretive theory. In D. Marsh & G. Stoker (Eds.), Theory and methods in political science (pp. 80–98). Houndsmill: Palgrave Macmillian.
Rainbird, H. (1990) Expectations and reflections: Examining conflict in the Andes. In R. Burgess (Ed.), Studies in qualitative methodologies (Vol. 2, pp. 77–98).
Sabot, E. (1999). Dr Jekyl, Mr H(i)de: The contrasting face of elites at interview. Geoforum, 30, 329–335.
Weed, M., Coren, E., Fiore, J., Wellard, I., Mansfield, L., Chatziefstathiou, D. & Dowse, S. (2009). A systematic review of the evidence base for developing a physical activity and health legacy from the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games. Report. Department of Health.
Weinreb, A. (2006). The limitations of stranger-interviewers in rural Kenya. American Sociological Review, 71, 1014–1039.
Weiss, R. (1995). Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. New York: The Free Press.
Whitson, D. & Horne, J. (2006). Underestimated costs and overestimated benefits? Comparing the outcomes of sports mega events in Canada and Japan. In D. Horne & W. Manzenreiter (Eds.), Special issue: Sociological review monograph series: Sports mega-events: Social scientific analyses of a global phenomenon (pp. 73–89). Oxford: Blackwell.
Wolcott, H. (2007). The question of intimacy in ethnography. Methodological Developments in Ethnography, 12, 27–33.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dowse, S. (2016). A Qualitative Case Study of the 2010 Football World Cup in South Africa: Practical Considerations and Personal Dilemmas. In: R Lamond, I., Platt, L. (eds) Critical Event Studies. Leisure Studies in a Global Era. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52386-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52386-0_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-52384-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-52386-0
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)