Skip to main content

The Problem: Climate Change, Politics and the Media

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

The quotes above—one from a handbook by social scientists and one from an action manifesto by a radical global journalist and author—say the same thing in different ways. Climate change is a historically unique problem. Indeed, it is key proof that humans and their actions have become “central” on a planetary scale. This importance betrays a daunting sense of weakness. Perhaps we have become too central in our political and organizational capacities. Thus, paradoxically, from the overwhelming complexity of climate change as a challenge (in Dryzek), dawns a glimmer of radical system critique (in Klein): in order to adapt to what is coming, we must transform ourselves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a more exhaustive list of publications by the MediaClimate network, see mediaclimate.net

  2. 2.

    In many European countries, newspapers continue to be read by a large proportion of the population. In developing countries, where illiteracy and poverty are widespread, they cater (even more) to elites. There are several reasons why studying newspapers remains our priority. One is the availability of the material. Another is that newspapers, even if poorlydistributed among the population at large, still play an important role for political and cultural elites—and their debates—in any country. In some countries it was difficult to restrict the study to print newspapers due to the dominant role played by online versions. Thus, some of our results are higher than they would have been if only print items were considered. In addition, one member of the research network has done separate (limited to fewer countries and a shorter time span) research on television coverage of the four IPCC reports (Painter 2014, 2015a, c).

Bibliography

  • Anderson, A. (2009). Media, politics and climate change: Towards a new research agenda. Sociology Compass, 3, 166–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (2010). Climate for change or how to create a green modernity? Theory Culture & Society, 27(2–3), 254–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berglez, P., & Olausson, U. (2014). The post-political condition of climate change: An ideology approach. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 25(1), 54–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boykoff, M. T. (2011). Who speaks for climate? Making sense of media reporting on climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, A., & Burgess, J. (2005). Cultural circuits of climate change in U.K. broadsheet newspapers, 1985–2003. Risk Analysis, 25(6), 1457–1469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, S., & Stern, N. (2014). Endogenous growth, convexity of damages and climate risk: How Nordhaus’ framework supports deep cuts in carbon emissions. Working Paper No. 180, Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy. Retrieved from http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/publication/endogenous-growth-convexity-of-damages-and-climate-risk-how-nordhaus-framework-supports-deep-cuts-in-carbon-emission/

  • Dryzek, J. S. (2013). The deliberative democrat’s idea of justice. European Journal of Political Theory, 12(4), 329–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, J. S. (2015). Reason and rhetoric in climate communication. Environmental Politics, 24(1), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, J. S., Norgaard, R. B., & Schlosberg, D. (Eds.). (2011). The Oxford handbook of climate change and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eide, E., Kunelius, R., & Kumpu, V. (Eds.). (2010). Global climate, local journalisms: A transnational study of how media make sense of climate summits. Bochum: Projekt Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Armesto, F. (2011). The world: A history. Boston: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (2007). Transnational public sphere: Transnationalizing the public sphere: On the legitimacy and efficacy of public opinion in a Post-Westphalian World. Theory, Culture & Society, 24(4), 7–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (2014). Transnationalizing the public sphere: On the legitimacy and efficiency of public opinion in a post-Westphalian world. In K. Nash (Ed.), Transnationalizing the public sphere (pp. 8–42). Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funtowicz, S., & Ravetz, J. (1993). Science for the post-normal age. Futures, 25(7), 739–755.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (2009). The politics of climate change. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (2001). The postnational constellation and the future of democracy. In M. Pensky (Ed.), The postnational constellation political essays (pp. 58–112). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulme, M. (2010). Cosmopolitan climates: Hybridity, foresight and meaning. Theory, Culture and Society, 27(2), 267–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulme, M. (2014). Can science fix climate change? A case against climate engineering. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. (2014, March 31). IPCC report: A changing climate creates pervasive risks but opportunities exist for effective responses. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC. Retrieved from http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/ar5/pr_wg2/140330_pr_wgII_spm_en.pdf

  • Jasanoff, S. (2011). Cosmopolitan knowledge: Climate science and global civic epistemology. In J. S. Dryzek, R. B. Nordgaard, & D. Schlosberg (Eds.), The oxford handbook of climate change and society (pp. 129–143). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, N. (2014). This changes everything: Capitalism vs. the climate. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2013). An inquiry into modes of existence: An anthropology of the moderns. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzoni, I., & Hulme, M. (2009). Believing is seeing: Laypeople’s views of future socio-economic and climate change in England and Italy. Public Understanding of Science, 18, 383–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lück J., Wozniak, A. & Wessler, H. (2015). Networks of coproduction: How journalists and environmental NGOs create common interpretations of the UN climate change conferences. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, M. (2013). The sources of social power: Volume 4, globalizations, 1945–2011. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, M. E. (2012). The hockey stick and the climate wars: Dispatches from the front lines. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeil, R. J., & McNeil, W. H. (2003). The human web: A bird’s eye view of world history. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, S. C. (2010). Communicating climate change: History, challenges, process and future directions. WIREs Climate Change, 1(1), 31–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. (2005). On the political. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. (2013). Agonistics: Thinking the world politically. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nerone, J. (2015). The media and public life: A history. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, W. D. (2008). A question of balance: Weighing the options on global warming policies. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. (2010). Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. M. (2014). The collapse of western civilization: A view from the future. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2009). A polycentric approach for coping with climate change. Policy Research Working Paper 5095. Background paper to the 2010 World Development Report. Released by The World Bank, Development Economics, Office of the Senior Vice President and Chief Economist, October 2009. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.177.7104&rep=rep1&type=pdf

  • Painter, J. (2010). Summoned by science: Reporting climate change at Copenhagen and beyond. Oxford, UK: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.

    Google Scholar 

  • Painter, J. (2014). Disaster averted? Television coverage of the 2013/14 IPCC’s climate change reports. Oxford, UK: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.

    Google Scholar 

  • Painter, J. (2015a). Disaster, uncertainty, opportunity, or risk? Key messages from the television coverage of the IPCC’s 2013/14 reports. METODE Science Studies Journal, 85, 73–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Painter, J. (2015c). Taking a bet on risk. Nature Climate Change, , 286–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, F. (2010). The climate files: The battle for the truth about global warming. London: Guardian Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, W., Holmberg, K., Hellsten, I., & Nerlich, B. (2014). Climate change on Twitter: Topics, communities and conversations about the 2013 IPCC Working Group 1 report. PLoS ONE, 9(4), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randers, J. (2015, January 15). Demokratin har svårt att hantera klimathotet [Democracy is having problems managing with climate threat]. Released by Extrakt, published by The Swedish Research Council Formas. Retrieved from http://www.extrakt.se/debatt-opinion/demokratin-oformogen-att-hantera-klimathotet/

  • Sagoff, M. (2011). The poverty of climate economics. In J. S. Dryzek, R. B. Norgaard, & D. Schlosberg (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of climate change and society (pp. 55–67). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schäfer, M., Ivanova, A., & Schmidt, A. (2014). What drives media attention for climate change? Explaining issue attention in Australian, German and Indian print media from 1996 to 2010. International Communication Gazette, 76(2), 152–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schäfer, M., & Schlichting, I. (2014). Media representations of climate change: A meta-analysis of the research field. Environmental Communication, 8(2), 142–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, A., Ivanova, A., & Schäfer, M. S. (2013). Media attention for climate change around the world: A comparative analysis of newspaper coverage in 27 countries. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 1233–1248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Splichal, S. (2009). “New” media, “old” theories: Does the (national) public melt into the air of global governance? European Journal of Communication, 24(4), 391–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, N. (2007). The economics of climate change: The Stern review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (2004). Modern social imaginaries. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urry, J. (2010). Climate change and society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkmer, I. (2015). The global public sphere: Public communication in the age of reflective interdependence. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessler, H. (2012). Identifying global public sphere moments. In J. F. Hovden (Ed.), Hunting high and low. Skriftfest til Jostein Gripsrud pa 60-arsdagen (pp. 437–455). Oslo: Scandinavian Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kunelius, R., Eide, E. (2017). The Problem: Climate Change, Politics and the Media. In: Kunelius, R., Eide, E., Tegelberg, M., Yagodin, D. (eds) Media and Global Climate Knowledge. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52321-1_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics