Abstract
This chapter presents selected findings from a qualitative research study on community engagement in Canadian higher education. Focusing on participants’ understanding of community engagement as a way to bring meaning to scholarly work and their positioning of community-engaged scholarship as a rejection of academic privilege, the author argues that participants’ understanding of engagement is mediated by neoliberalism and the discourse of new public management. The chapter also draws attention to the relationship between surveillance and privilege, questioning the ways in which inclusion of community in scholarly work might disrupt the neoliberalization of higher education.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Babbie, E. (1995). The practice of social research (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Barker, D. (2004, September). From service learning to the scholarship of engagement: A taxonomy of civic renewal in American higher education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL. Retrieved from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p59505_index.html
Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: The priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Jossey-Bass.
Boyer, E. (1996). The scholarship of engagement. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 49(7), 11–20.
Butin, D. W. (2007). Focusing our aim: Strengthening faculty commitment to community engagement. Change, 34–37.
Butin, D. W. (2010). Service-learning in theory and practice: The future of community engagement in higher education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Calleson, D., Jordan, C., & Seifer, S. (2005). Community-engaged scholarship: Is faculty work in communities a true academic enterprise? Academic Medicine, 8(4), 317–321.
Creswell, J. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
Currie, J., & Vidovich, L. (2009). The changing nature of academic work. In M. Tight, K. H. Mok, J. Husman, & C. Morphew (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of higher education (pp. 441–452). New York: Routledge.
Doberneck, D., Glass, C., & Schweitzer, J. (2010). From rhetoric to reality: A typology of publically engaged scholarship. Journal of Higher Education Outreach & Engagement, 14(4), 5–35.
Fanelli, C., & Meades, J. (2011). Austerity, Ontario and post-secondary education: The case of “Canada’s capital university”. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 9(2), 216–240.
Fleming, V., Gaidys, U., & Robb, Y. (2003). Hermeneutic research in nursing: Developing a Gadamerian-based research method. Nursing Inquiry, 10(2), 113–120.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (trans: Sheridan Smith, A. M.). New York: Pantheon Books.
Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
Harvey, D. (2007). Neoliberalism as creative destruction. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 610(1), 21–44.
Harvey, D. (2008). The right to the city. New Left Review, 53, 23–40.
Hill, D., & Kumar, R. (Eds.). (2009). Neoliberalism and its impacts. In Global neoliberalism and education and its consequences (pp. 12–29). New York: Routledge.
Israel, B. A., Schulz, A. J., Parker, E. A., & Becker, A. B. (1998). Review of community-based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 19, 173–202.
Jones, G. A. (Ed.) (2012). Higher education in Canada: Different systems, different perspectives. New York: Routledge.
Kajner, T. (2015a). Construction and mediation of the “other” in community-engaged scholarship: The importance of not knowing. Engaged Scholar Journal, 1(1), 15–32.
Kajner, T. (2015b). Living well with others: Exploring community-engaged scholarship in Canadian higher education. Unpublished doctoral thesis. University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Kirby, D. (2012). Marketizing Canadian higher education: An examination of recent access policy reforms. In H. Schuetz, G. Mendiola, & D. Conrad (Eds.), State and market in higher education reforms: Trends, policies and experiences in comparative perspective (pp. 43–55). Rotterdam, NL: Sense Publishers.
Lorenz, C. (2012). If you’re so smart, why are you under surveillance? Universities, neoliberalism and new public management. Critical Inquiry, 38, 599–629.
Martin, S. (2010). Co-production of social research: Strategies for engaged scholarship. Public Money and Management, 30(4), 211–218.
Mohanty, C. T. (2013). Transnational feminist crossings: On neoliberalism and radical critique. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 38(4), 967–991.
Mullins, P. (2011). Practicing anthropology and the politics of engagement: 2010 year in review. American Anthropologist, 113(2), 235–245.
Olssen, M., & Peters, M. (2005). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: From the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 313–345.
O’Meara, K. (2000). Scholarship unbound: Assessing service as scholarship for promotion and tenure. New York: Routledge.
Oxford Dictionary Online, (n.d.). Privilege. Retrieved from http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/privilege
Peters, M. (2013). Managerialism and the neoliberal university: Prospects for new forms of “open management” in higher education. Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice, 5(1), 11–26.
Robertson, S. (2014). Untangling theories and hegemonic projects in researching education and the knowledge economy. In A. Reid, E. Hart, & M. Peters (Eds.), A companion to research in education (pp. 267–276). Dordrecht: Springer.
Schuetze, H., & Mendiola, G. (2012). In H. Schuetz, G. Mendiola, & D. Conrad (Eds.), State and market in higher education reforms: Trends, policies and experiences in comparative perspective (pp. 1–5). Rotterdam, NL: Sense Publishers.
Shultz, L. (2013). Engaged scholarship in a time of the corporatization of the university and distrust of the public sphere: A decolonizing response. In L. Shultz & T. Kajner (Eds.), Engaged scholarship: The politics of engagement and disengagement (pp. 43–54). Rotterdam, NL: Sense Publishers.
Springer, S. (2012). Neoliberalism as discourse: Between Foucauldian political economy and Marxian poststructuralism. Critical Discourse Studies, 9(2), 133–147.
Stanton, T. (2008). New times demand new scholarship: Opportunities and challenges for civic engagement at research universities. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 3(1), 19–42.
Van de Ven, A. (2007). Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. New York: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kajner, T. (2016). Community-Engaged Scholarship and the Discourse of Academic Privilege in Canadian Higher Education. In: Shultz, L., Viczko, M. (eds) Assembling and Governing the Higher Education Institution. Palgrave Studies in Global Citizenship Education and Democracy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52261-0_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52261-0_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-52260-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-52261-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)