Skip to main content

Religious Geopolitics and the Geopolitics of Religion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Understanding Geography and War
  • 852 Accesses

Abstract

Geographers have long had difficulty in writing about religion as there are few researchers who have the methodological background to cross these disciplines. Nevertheless, to understand geography and war, we need to know the importance of religion. Examples from the USA, Russia and Vatican City will be presented. However, it will be argued that the literature as it stands suffers from two biases: a focus on religion in the USA and a focus on extremes. Suggestions will be made as to how future research can move away from these biases and focus research on elite feedbacks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Sparke (2005) cannot resist waxing entertainingly lyrical: ‘a Jesus-trick imagined in the geopolitically incarnate form of the U.S. military coming down to earth (or at least dropping bombs down to earth) and bringing neoliberal apostates and agnostics into order’ (Sparke 2005, 308). See also Sturm (2010, 136).

  2. 2.

    The exact number varies, depending on whether we read Huntington (1993) or Huntington (1997). Across the two pieces, he identifies seven, eight or nine. In the earlier work, they were Western, Confucian, Japanese, Islamic, Hindu, Slavic-Orthodox, Latin American and possibly African. By the later work, he had identified Western, Latin American, African, Islamic, Sinic, Hindu, Orthodox, Buddhist and Japanese. If you look carefully at the map of civilisations in the later work, you will notice that Israel has been shaded in with diagonal black-and-white stripes which, according to Huntington’s map, makes it part of the Islamic civilisation.

  3. 3.

    There are, of course, many more moderate and sophisticated views. As Wallace (2006) reminds us, ‘academic geographers, inured as they are to popular but crass misunderstandings of their discipline, might therefore be able to empathise, whatever their personal belief system, with claims that Christian theology embodies more substantive intellectual resources than those evidenced by tele-evangelists’ (Wallace 2006, 211).

  4. 4.

    For Yorgason and Robertson (2006, 259), it was never absent, it was just ignored.

  5. 5.

    Indeed, one of the reasons for Joseph Ratzinger’s choice of the pontifical name Benedict was that Benedict was the patron saint of Europe

  6. 6.

    Bowman (1942, 654; 656); Broek (1943, 143); Freeman (1961, 225); Morgenthau (1978, 164–165); Fukushima (1997, 408).

  7. 7.

    We can see the case of the 1993 siege in Waco, TX, in which 76 people died, as a form of ‘historic premillennialism’ – see Harding (1994, 15).

  8. 8.

    On numerology, religion and geopolitics, even quantitative conflict researchers, who should know better, are susceptible. For the Correlates of war project, every state in the world has a numerical ID. The original list and rationale were published as Russet et al. (1968) and the latest version is Correlates of War Project (2011). So for example, the country ID number for the USA is ‘2,’ while the country ID number for France is ‘220.’ Israel has been given ‘666.’

  9. 9.

    Mansfield (2003) also gives background on the effect that that Robison had on Reagan and George W. Bush.

  10. 10.

    Or, phrased more figuratively, ‘[l]ike a priest of the black arts, Bush has successfully disinterred the remnants of Reagan’s millenarian rhetoric from the graveyard of chiliastic fantasies, appropriated it for his own interests, and played it in public like a charm’ (McLaren 2002, 327).

References

  • Agnew, J. (2003). Geopolitics: Re-visioning world politics (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agnew, J. (2006). Religion and geopolitics. Geopolitics, 11, 183–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, I. (1942). Geography vs. geopolitics. Geographical Review, 32(4), 646–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, P. (1992). When time shall be no more: Prophecy belief in modern American culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broek, J. O. M. (1943). Geopolitics and political geography. Far Eastern Survey, 12(14), 143–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. E. (2009). Religionless religion: Beyond belief to understanding. Bloomington, IN: iUniverse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Correlates of War Project. (2011). State system membership list, v2011. Retrieved from http://www.correlatesofwar.org

  • Dijkink, G. (2006). When geopolitics and religion fuse: A historical perspective. Geopolitics, 11, 192–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dittmer, J. (2007). Of Gog and Magog: The geopolitical visions of Jack Chick and premillennial dispensationalism. Acme: An International e-Journal for Critical Geographies, 6(2), 278–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichenwald, K. (2012). 500 days: Secrets and lies in the terror wars. Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fassin, É. (2007). The geopolitics of Vatican theology. Public Culture, 19(2), 233–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, T. W. (1961). A hundred years of geography. Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukushima, Y. (1997). Japanese geopolitics and its background: What is the real legacy of the past? Political Geography, 16(5), 407–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (1994). Imagining the last days: The politics of apocalyptic language. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 48(3), 14–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitchcock, M. (2003). The second coming of Babylon: What bible prophecy says about… Iraq in end times; Israel and Armageddon; Antichrist’s ruling city; America in the final days; war in the Middle East. Oregon, US: Multnomah.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. P. (1993). The clash of civilisations? Foreign Affairs, 22–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. P. (1997). The clash of civilisations and the remaking of world order. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kong, L. (2001). Mapping ‘new’ geographies of religion: Politics and poetics in modernity. Progress in Human Geography, 25(2), 211–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kong, L. (2010). Global shifts, theoretical shifts: Changing geographies of religion. Progress in Human Geography, 34(6), 755–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey, H. (2011). The everlasting hatred: The roots of jihad. Washington, D.C.: WND Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, S. (2003). The faith of George W. Bush. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, F. (2013). The geopolitics of Buddhist reincarnation: Contested futures of Tibetan leadership. Area, 45(2), 162–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, P. (2002). George Bush, apocalypse sometime soon, and the American imperium. Cultural Studies, Critical Methodologies, 3(2), 327–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Megoran, N. (2013). Radical politics and the apocalypse: Activist readings of revelation. Area, 45(2), 141–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgenthau, H. J. (1978). Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace (fifth edition, revised). New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, H. M. (1983). The Revelation record. Wheaton, Illinois: Tyndale House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Fahrenholz, G. (2006). America’s battle for god: A European Christian looks at civil religion. William B. Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyroos, L. (2001). Religeopolitics: Dissident geopolitics and the ‘fundamentalism’ of Hamas and Kach. Geopolitics, 6(3), 135–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, S. D. (1998). Arguing the Apocalypse: A theory of millennial rhetoric. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ó Tuathail, G. (1996). Critical geopolitics: The politics of writing global space. University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ó Tuathail, G. (1998). Introduction: Thinking critically about geopolitics. In G. Ó Tuathail, S. Dalby, & P. Routledge (Eds.), The geopolitics reader (1st ed., pp. 1–12). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russet, B. M., Singer, J. D., & Small, M. (1968). National political units in the twentieth century: A standardized list. American Political Science Review, 62(03), 932–951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidorov, D. (2006). Post-imperial Third Romes: Resurrections of a Russian Orthodox geopolitical metaphor. Geopolitics, 11(2), 317–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skrimshire, S. (2014). Climate change and apocalyptic faith. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 5(2), 233–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sopher, D. E. (1967). Geography of religions. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparke, M. (2005). In the space of theory: Postfoundational geographies of the nation-state. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprout, H., & Sprout, M. (1957). Environmental factors in the study of international politics. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 309–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturm, T. (2006). Prophetic eyes: The theatricality of Mark Hitchcock’s premillennial geopolitics. Geopolitics, 11(2), 231–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturm, T. (2010). Imagining apocalyptic geopolitics: American evangelical citationality of evil others. In J. Dittmer & T. Sturn (Eds.), Mapping the end times: American evangelical geopolitics and apocalyptic visions (pp. 133–154). Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturm, T. (2013). The future of religious geopolitics: Towards a research and theory agenda. Area, 45(2), 134–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tse, J. K. H. (2013). Grounded theologies: ‘Religion’ and the ‘secular’ in human geography. Progress in Human Geography, 38, 201–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, I. (2006). Territory, typology, theology: Geopolitics and the Christian scriptures. Geopolitics, 11(2), 209–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, T. P. (1979). Living in the shadow of the second coming: American premillennialism (1875–1925). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J. K. (1966). Human nature in geography: Fourteen papers, 1925–1965. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yorgason, E., & Dora, V. della. (2009). Geography, religion, and emerging paradigms: Problematizing the dialogue: Editorial. Social & Cultural Geography, 10(6), 629–637.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yorgason, E., & Robertson, D. B. (2006). Mormonism’s raveling and unraveling of a geopolitical thread. Geopolitics, 11, 256–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pickering, S. (2017). Religious Geopolitics and the Geopolitics of Religion. In: Understanding Geography and War. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52217-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics