Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Small Voluntary Organisations in the ‘Age of Austerity’: Challenges and Opportunities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Small Voluntary Organisations in the 'Age of Austerity'

  • 249 Accesses

Abstract

This final chapter explores the limitations of neoliberal orthodoxy and the scope for change. I argue that a wider perspective is possible through reflexivity. With reflection, grassroots organisations are more able to engage in tactical action to gain neoliberal profits or to withdraw if the costs of gaining external resources threaten the core mission of the organisation. Supportive coalitions can assist grassroots organisations and can build a groundswell of support for policy change. Critical intellectuals can provide a robust evidence base to underpin this counter-discourse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The UK referendum on leaving the European Union, polling on 23rd June 2016.

  2. 2.

    Bourdieu (1992) La main gauche et la main droite de l’etat, interview by R.P. Droit & T. Ferenczi for Le Monde 14th January.

Bibliography

  • Adkins, L. (2003) Reflexivity: freedom or habit of gender? Theory, Culture & Society 20(6), 22–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1979) Distinction: a social critique of the judgement of taste. English Ed. 2006. Trans. R. Nice. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1989). The state nobility: elite schools in the field of power. (English ed. (1996). Trans. L. C. Clough). Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1992, 14th January). La main gauche et la main droite de l’etat. Interview by R. P. Droit & T. Ferenczi. Le Monde.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1994). Practical reason. (English ed. (2007)) Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1997). Pascalian meditations. (English ed. (2006), Trans. R. Nice). Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1998a). Acts of resistance: against the new myths of our time. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. et al. (1999). The weight of the world: social suffering in contemporary society. (English ed. (2006) Trans. P. P. Ferguson et al.). Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (2001a). Firing back: against the tyranny of the market 2. (English ed. (2003), Trans. L. Wacquant). London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (2001c). La sociologie est un sport de combat. Dir. Pierre Carles. Producers Annie Gonzalez & Veronique Fregosi. Brooklyn and Paris: First Run/Icarus Films, VF Films and Pierre Carles (C-P Productions). VHS videotape. NTSC standard. 146 minutes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (2002). Against the policy of depoliticization. Studies in Political Economy, 69, 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (2003) Participant objectivation. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 9. 281–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (2005). The social structures of the economy. (Trans. C. Turner). Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (2014). On the state: lectures at the College de France 1989–1992. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, H., Ellis Paine, A., Alcock, P., Kendall, J., & Macmillan, R. (2014, April). Who’s speaking for whom? Exploring issues of third sector leadership, leverage and legitimacy. Third Sector Research Centre Working Paper 121, Birmingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callewaert, S. (2006). Bourdieu, critic of Foucault: the case of empirical social science against double-game-philosophy. Theory, Culture & Society, 23, 73–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, J. (2015). Volunteering, the market, and neoliberalism. People, Place & Policy, 9(2), 139–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanchard, M. (2003). Acts of misrecognition: transnational black politics, anti-imperialism and the ethnocentrisms of Pierre Bourdieu and Loic Wacquant. Theory Culture Society, 20, 5–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M., & Young, P. (2009). Developing community and social cohesion through grassroots bridge-building: an exploration. Policy & Politics, 37(4), 517–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacklin-Jarvis, C. (2015). Collaborating across sector boundaries: a story of tensions and dilemmas. Voluntary Sector Review, 6(3), 285–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, O. (2014). The establishment: and how they get away with it. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovell, T. (2003). Resisting with authority: historical specificity, agency and the performative self. Theory, Culture & Society, 20(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathers, A., & Novelli, M. (2007). Researching resistance to neoliberal globalization: engaged ethnography as solidarity and praxis. Globalizations, 4(2), 229–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milbourne, L. (2013). Voluntary sector in transition: hard times or new opportunities? Bristol: Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Milbourne, L., & Cushman, M. (2015). Complying, transforming or resisting in the new austerity? Realigning social welfare and independent action among English voluntary organisations. Journal of Social Policy, 44(3), 463–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochester, C. (2013). Rediscovering voluntary action: the beat of a different drum. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sandel, M. J. (2013). What money can’t buy: the moral limits of markets. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwabenland, C., King, D., & Benson, A. (2014). Researchers and practitioners: colleagues or strangers? NCIA. http://independentaction.net/publications-resources/other-research-and-case-studies/

  • Singleton, R., Deakin, N., Hind, A., Holmes, J., Massie, B., Unwin, J.,…Wilkie, N. (2015, February) An independent mission: the voluntary sector in 2015. The Baring Foundation, Civil Exchange & DHA. www.independencepanel.org.uk

  • Swarz, D. L. (2003). From critical sociology to public intellectual: Pierre Bourdieu and politics. Theory & Society Nov., 32(5/6), 791–823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M., & Warburton, D. (2003). Legitimacy and the role of UK third sector organizations in the policy process. Voluntas, 14(3), 321–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberghe, F. (1999). “The real is relational”: an epistemological analysis of Pierre Bourdieu’s generative structuralism. Sociological Theory, 17(1), 32–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolford, A., & Curran, A. (2012). Community positions, neoliberal dispositions: managing nonprofit social services within the bureaucratic field. Critical Sociology, 39(1), 45–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Business, University of Greenwich, London, UK

    Pauline McGovern

Authors
  1. Pauline McGovern
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McGovern, P. (2017). Small Voluntary Organisations in the ‘Age of Austerity’: Challenges and Opportunities. In: Small Voluntary Organisations in the 'Age of Austerity'. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52188-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation