Abstract
This chapter explores the effects of and limitations to neoliberal orthodoxy within two grassroots organisations for people with heart disease. Using Bourdieu’s concepts of generic and specific forces that act on fields, I argue that neoliberal values do affect such organisations. Leaders emerged who were of higher social class than other members and with experience in contracts and financial management. They “naturally” pursued external funding. However, this orientation was counterbalanced by internal forces that related to the social mission and the role of volunteers in their organisations. These internal forces were a safeguard against the unrestrained pursuit of external funding as a primary organisational goal.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Bourdieu argues that habitus is both a bodily orientation (a “hexis”, 1997, p. 141) and an embedded system of classification of the nature of reality which may be largely pre-conscious (1994, p. 8). Both aspects combine to give:
…an immediate relationship of involvement, tension and attention, which constructs the world and gives it meaning. (Bourdieu 1997, p. 142)
Bibliography
Alcock, P. (2009). Third sector organisation and public service: what can research tell us? Britain in 2010 ESRC, Swindon, 44.
Anheier, H. K. (2005). Nonprofit organisations: theory, management, policy. Abingdon: Routledge.
Bourdieu, P. (1993). Sociology in question. (Trans. R. Nice). London: Sage.
Bourdieu, P. (1994). Practical reason. (English ed. (2007)) Cambridge: Polity.
Bourdieu, P. (1997). Pascalian meditations. (English ed. (2006), Trans. R. Nice). Cambridge: Polity.
Bourdieu, P. (2001b). Science of science and reflexivity. (English ed. (2004), Trans. R. Nice). Cambridge: Polity.
Callinicos, A. (2001). Against the third way: an anti-capitalist critique. Cambridge: Polity.
Carman, J. G. (2010). The accountability movement. NVSQ, 39(2), 256–274.
Craig, G., & Taylor, M. (2002). Dangerous liaisons: local government and the voluntary and community sectors. In C. Glendinning, M. Powell, & K. Rummery (Eds.), Partnerships, new labour and the governance of welfare (pp. 131–148).Bristol: Policy. ch.9.
Ebrahim, A. S., & Rangan, V. K. (2010, May). The limits of nonprofit impact: a contingency framework for measuring social performance. Harvard Business School General Management Unit Working Paper 10-099.
Eikenberry, A. M., & Drapal Kluver, J. (2004). The marketisation of the nonprofit sector: civil society at risk? Public Administration Review, 64(2), 132–140.
Fligstein, N. (2001). Social skill and the theory of fields. Sociological Theory, 19(2), 105–125.
Foster, W., & Bradach, J. (2005, February). Should nonprofits seek profits? Harvard Business Review, 83(2), 92–100.
Frumkin, P. (2002). On being nonprofit: a conceptual and policy primer. London: Harvard University Press.
Gregory, J., & Battle Anderson, B. (2004). Sector-bending: blurring the lines between nonprofit and for-profit. In P. Frumkin & B. Imber (Eds.), In search of the nonprofit sector (pp. 51–72). New Brunswick: Transaction. Ch.4.
Guo, B. (2006). Charity for profit? Exploring factors associated with the commercialization of human service. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(1), 123–138.
Hager, M. A., Galaskiewicz, J., & Larson, J. A. (2004). Structural embeddedness and the liability of newness among nonprofit organizations. Public Management Review, 6(2), 159–188.
Hogg, E., & Baines, S. (2011). Changing responsibilities and roles of the voluntary and community sector in the welfare mix: a review. Social Policy & Society, 10(03), 341–352.
Hustinx, L., De Waele, E., & Delcour, C. (2015). Hybridisation in a corporatist third sector regime: paradoxes of ‘responsibilised autonomy’. Voluntary Sector Review, 6(1), 115–134.
Macmillan, R. (2010). The third sector delivering public services: an evidence review. Birmingham: Third Sector Research Centre.
McDonald, R. E. (2007). An investigation of innovation in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(2), 256–281.
McGovern, P. (2014). Small voluntary organisations in Britain’s ‘Big Society’: a Bourdieusian approach. Voluntas, 25(3), 636–656.
Milbourne, L. (2009). Remodelling the third sector: advancing collaboration or competition in community based initiatives? Journal of Social Policy, 38(2), 1–21.
Milbourne, L., & Cushman, M. (2015). Complying, transforming or resisting in the new austerity? Realigning social welfare and independent action among English voluntary organisations. Journal of Social Policy, 44(3), 463–485.
Mullins, D., & Jones, T. (2015). From ‘contractors to the state’ to ‘protectors of public value’? Relations between non-profit housing hybrids and the state in England. Voluntary Sector Review, 6(3), 261–283.
Pennen, T. V. D., & Bortel, G. V. (2015). Exemplary urban practitioners in neighbourhood renewal: survival of the fittest…and the fitting. Voluntas. doi:10.1007/s11266-015-9600
Phillimore, J., & McCabe, A. (2015). Small-scale civil society and social policy: the importance of experiential learning, insider knowledge and diverse motivations in shaping community action. Voluntary Sector Review, 6(2), 135–151.
Rees, J., Mullins, D., & Bovaird, T. (2012, January). Third sector partnerships for public service delivery: an evidence review. Third Sector Research Centre Working Paper 60.
Rochester, C. (2013). Rediscovering voluntary action: the beat of a different drum. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sills, D. L. (1957, 1980 rpt). The volunteers, means and ends in a national organisation: a report. Columbia: Free Press.
Spratt, J., Shucksmith, J., Philip, K., & Watson, C. (2007). Embedded yet separate: tensions in voluntary sector working to support mental health in state-run schools. Journal of Education Policy, 22(4), 411–428.
Valeau, P. J. (2015). Stages and pathways of development of non-profit organizations: an integrative model. Voluntas, 26, 1894–1919.
Wolch, J. R. (1990). The shadow state: government and the voluntary sector in transition. New York: The Foundation Center.
Yarwood, R. (2005). Geography, citizenship and volunteering: some uses of the higher education active community fund in geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 29(3), 355–368.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McGovern, P. (2017). Getting Needed Resources: Life in Small VCSE Organisations. In: Small Voluntary Organisations in the 'Age of Austerity'. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52188-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52188-0_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-52186-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-52188-0
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)