Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Global Diversities ((GLODIV))

  • 305 Accesses

Abstract

This conclusion summarizes the study’s findings and assesses the remit of diversity policies in view of a potential backlash against diversity and of comparing its ideas with those of multiculturalism. I also develop a nuanced delineation of my findings by pointing out the similarities as well as some of the differences across the three cities. Finally, I discuss several directions for refining the diversity concept and propose several ways in which future research might contribute.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Appadurai, A. (1995). The production of locality. In R. Fardon (Ed.), Counterworks: Managing the diversity of knowledge. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick-Schiller, N., & Caglar, A. (2010). Locating migration: Rescaling cities and migrants. New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannerz, U. (2002). Transnational connections: Culture, people, places. London/New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. (2013). The global city: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiller, M. (2010). The migrant women’s movement in Amsterdam in the context of diversity politics. In M. Warat & A. Malek (Eds.), Beyond the borders. Women-migration-citizenship (Ponad granicami: Kobiety, migracje, obywatelstwo). Krakow: Jagiellonian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholten, P., & Penninx, R. (2016). The multilevel governance of migration and integration. In B. Garcés-Mascareñas, & R. Penninx (Eds.), Integration processes and policies in Europe (pp. 91–108). Cham/Heidelberg/New York/Dordrecht/London: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. P. (2001). Transnational urbanism: Locating globalisation. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uitermark, J. (2010). Dynamics of power in Dutch integration politics: From accommodation to confrontation. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vertovec, S. (1999). Conceiving and researching transnationalism. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 22(2), 447–462. doi:10.1080/014198799329558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vertovec, S., & Wessendorf, S. (2010). The multiculturalism backlash: European discourses, policies and practices. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schiller, M. (2016). Conclusion. In: European Cities, Municipal Organizations and Diversity. Global Diversities. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52185-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52185-9_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-52183-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-52185-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics