Abstract
This chapter focuses on the Pupil Premium, the latest policy initiative in England designed to close the socio-economic gap in educational outcomes. The policy provides additional funding to be spent specifically on children from low-income/disadvantaged backgrounds. Linda, appointed as a Pupil Premium coordinator, describes the approach in her school, while in the second vignette, a group of other teachers debate the policy’s targeted approach. The academic responses consider, in different ways, how schools can respond to disadvantage and how policies like this help or hinder. Becky Francis supports the ring-fencing of funds for individuals (which some of the teachers contest), reminding us that research has repeatedly shown that disadvantaged pupils are often not prioritised when left to teacher discretion. Pat Thomson sets out the benefits of an approach informed by teacher inquiry – to ensure that responses are not off the shelf, short-term fixes, but rooted in a deep understanding of the students’ lives and the economic and social forces that shape them.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, Gary L., Kathryn Herr, and Ann Sigrid. Nihlen. 2007. Studying Your Own School: An Educator’s Guide to Practitioner Action Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Clifton, Jonathan, and Will Cook. 2012. A Long Division: Closing the Attainment Gap in England’s Secondary Schools. London: IPPR.
Francis, Becky. 2013. Promoting Social Mobility: What the Government Can and Should Be Doing. Leicester: ASCL.
Fraser, N. May 1996. Social Justice in the Age of Identity Politics: Redistribution, Recognition and Participation. In The Tanner Lectures on Human Values. Stanford University.
Iniesta-Martinez, Samaira and Helen Evans. 2013. Pupils not claiming free school meal, DfE Report. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/183380/DFE-RR235.pdf.
Machin, Stephen, and James Vernoit. November 2010. Academy Schools: Who Benefits? In Centrepiece. London: LSE. http://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/cp325.pdf.
Mwatsama, Modi, and Lindsey Stewart. Food Poverty and Health Briefing Statement.
Reay, D., and H. Lucey. 2003. The Limits of ‘Choice’: Children and Inner City Schooling. Sociology 37, no. 1, 121–42.
Schools Policy ‘car Crash’ Sows Confusion among Parents. The Guardian. January 11, 2015. http://www.theguardian.com/education/2015/jan/11/schools-policy-car-crash-confusion-meals-pupil-premium.
Sibieta, L., H. Chowdry, and A. Muriel. 2007. Level the Playing Field? The Implications of School Funding. Report. CfBT Education Trust.
Sibieta, Luke. 2009. A Disadvantaged Pupil Premium. Observations: Reflections on Current Events http://www.ifs.org.uk/publications/4453.
Thomson, Pat. 2002. Schooling the Rustbelt Kids: Making the Difference in Changing times. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham.
Wilkinson, Richard G. 2005. The Impact of Inequality: How to Make Sick Societies Healthier. New York: New Press.
Wilkinson, Richard G., and Kate Pickett. 2010. The Spirit Level: Why Equality Is Better for Everyone. London: Penguin Books. May 2005. http://www.fph.org.uk/uploads/bs_food_poverty.pdf.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bibby, T., Lupton, R., Raffo, C. (2017). Government Policies in Practice. In: Responding to Poverty and Disadvantage in Schools. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52156-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52156-9_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-52155-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-52156-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)