Skip to main content

Intellectual Cosmopolitanism as Stewardship in Medical Humanities and Undergraduate Writing Pedagogy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Directions in Literature and Medicine Studies
  • 466 Accesses

Abstract

In composition studies, textual cosmopolitanism refers to the ability to navigate writing conventions in multiple modalities. Building on this idea results in a model of intellectual cosmopolitanism that can accommodate complex subject matter, like medical humanities, as well as writing pedagogy. Intellectual cosmopolitanism encourages meaningful engagement with both subject matter and writing conventions and thus can enrich medical humanities, constituted in medical education or as humanistic inquiry and pedagogy. Stewardship, which presupposes respect for all scholarship and encourages accommodation and collaboration, underpins intellectual cosmopolitanism. Ultimately, intellectual cosmopolitans serve as stewards rather than owners, a model of teaching and scholarship consistent with Doug Hesse’s construction of writing studies.

To begin (writing, living), we must have death.

—Helene Cixous.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Works Cited

  • Atkinson, Sarah, Bethan Evans, and Angela Woods. “The ‘Medical’ and ‘Health’ in a Critical Medical Humanities.” Journal of Medical Humanities 36: 71–81. (2015) Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bard College. Language and Thinking Program. About Language and Thinking. Web.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthes, Roland. “The Death of the Author.” Image, Music, Text. Roland Barthes. Trans. R. Howard. New York: Hill and Wang, 1997. 42–8. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomae, David. “Inventing the University.” Journal of Basic Writing 5.1 (1986): 4–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwashi, Anis S., and Mary Jo Reiff. Genre: An Introduction to Theory, Research and Pedagogy. New York: Parlor Press, 2010. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baylor University. “What Do We Mean by the Medical Humanities?” The Medical Humanities Program. Web. http://www.baylor.edu/medical_humanities/index.php?id=874014. Accessed 2 March 2016.

  • Bazerman, Charles. “The Case for Writing Studies as a Major Discipline.” Rhetoric and Composition as Intellectual Work. Ed. Gary A. Olson. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 2002. 32–8. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Bethesda: The Commission, 1978. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boler, Megan. Feeling Power: Emotions and Education. New York: Routledge, 1999. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, Lynn Z., Donald A. Daikar, and Edward M. White. Composition in the Twenty-First Century: Crisis and Change. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, Gillie. “Boundaries of Humanities: Writing Medical Humanities.” Arts & Humanities in Higher Education 7.2 (2007): 131–48. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, Wayne C. The Company We Keep: An Ethics of Fiction. Los Angeles: U of California P, 1988. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “The Ethics of Medicine as Revealed in Literature.” Stories Matter: The Role of Narrative in Medical Ethics. Ed. Rita Charon and Martha Montello. New York: Routledge, 2002. 10–20. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, Howard. “Defining the Medical Humanities: Three Conceptions and Three Narratives.” Journal of Medical Humanities 32 (2011): 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, Peter. The Melodramatic Imagination: Balzac, Henry James, Melodrama and the Mode of Excess. New Haven: Yale UP, 1995. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charon, Rita, and Martha Montello. Stories Matter: The Role of Narrative in Medical Ethics. New York: Routledge, 2002. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciapperino, Luca, and Giovanni Boniolo. “Rethinking Medical Humanities.” Journal of Medical Humanities 35 (2014): 377–87. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cixous, Helene. Three Steps on the Ladder of Writing. New York: Columbia UP, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell University Cooperative Extension and New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. “The Stewardship Ethic: A Guide for Using Your Land.” Cornell University Cooperative Extension and New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Forest Connect Fact Sheet Series. Web. www.forestconnect.info. Accessed 2 March 2016.

  • Coulehan, Jack. “What is Medical Humanities and Why?” Lit Med Magazine. Jan 28, 2008. n.p. Web.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couser, G. Thomas. “What Disability Studies has to Offer Medical Education.” Journal of Medical Humanities. 32 (2011): 21–30. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • DasGupta, Sayantani. “Narrative Medicine, Narrative Humility.” Creative Nonfiction. 52 (2014): np. Web. https://www.creativenonfiction.org/online-reading/narrative-medicine-narrative-humility. Accessed 2 March 2016.

  • DeTora, Lisa. “Owning Our Limits: Composition and the Discourse of Science.” Who Speaks for Writing: Stewardship in Writing Studies in the Twenty-first Century. Ed. Jennifer Rich and Ethna D. Lay. New York: Peter Lang, 2012. 49–60. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobrin, Sidney I. Postcomposition. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, Rice, J.A., and Vastola, Mike. Beyond Postprocess. Logan: Utah State UP, 2011. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erwin, Cheryl J. “Development of a Medical Humanities and Ethics Certificate Program in Texas.” Journal of Medical Humanities 35 (2014): 389–403. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Lester D, Pachicki, Kathleen, Jones Therese, and Wear, Delease. Health Humanities Reader. New Brunswick: Rutgers UP, 2014. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, John A. “The Conference on College Composition and Communication.” College Composition and Communication 1 (1950): 12. R.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graf, Gerald, Birkenstein, Cathy, and Durst, Russel. They Say/I Say: The Moves that Matter in Academic Writing. New York: WW Norton, 2011. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, Joe Marshall. “Putting Process into Circulation: Textual Cosmopolitanism.” Beyond Postprocess. Ed. Sidney I. Dobrin, J.A. Rice, and Michael Vastola. Logan: Utah State UP, 2011. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Joseph. Rewriting: How to do Things with Texts. Logan: Utah State UP, 2006. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvard University. Harvard College Writing Program. “Welcome.” Web. http://writingprogram.fas.harvard.edu. Accessed 2 March 2016.

  • Hawthorn, Jeremy and Jakob Lothe. “The Ethical (Re)Turn.” Narrative Ethics. Ed. Jeremy Hawthorn and Jakob Lothe. Amsterdam: Brill Academic Publishers, 2013. Np. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, Doug. “Foreword.” The End of Composition Studies. Ed. D.W. Smit. Carbondale: U of Southern Illinois P, 2004. ix–xiv. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • _________. “2005 CCCC Chair’s Address: Who Owns Writing?” College Composition and Communication 57 (2005): 335–7. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • _________. “Who Speaks for Writing? Ownership, Stewardship, Expertise, Ethics.” Who Owns Writing? Revisited. Hofstra University Cultural Center 16–18 October 2008. Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • _________. “Who Speaks for Writing? Expertise, Ownership, and Stewardship.” Who Speaks for Writing: Stewardship in Writing Studies in the Twenty-First Century. Ed. Jennifer Rich and Ethna D. Lay. New York: Peter Lang, 2012. 1–6. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Therese, Wear, Delese, and Friedman, Lester D. “The Why, the What, and the How of the Medical/Health Humanities.” Health Humanities Reader. Ed Friedman et al. New Brunswick: Rutgers UP, 2014. 1–12. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, Joel T. “Applied Medical Humanities: Addressing Vexing Deficits, Promoting Enduring Skills.” American Medical Association Journal of Ethics 16.8 (2014): 610–13. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lay, Ethna Dempsey and Jennifer Rich. “Introduction.” Who Speaks for Writing: Stewardship in Writing Studies in the Twenty-first Century. Ed. Jennifer Rich and Ethna D. Lay. New York: Peter Lang, 2012. 1–8. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, Bradley E. “Narrative Medicine and Healthcare Reform.” Journal of Medical Humanities 32 (2011): 9–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotier, Kristopher M. “Around 1986: The Externalization of Cognition and the Emergence of Postprocess Invention.” CCC 67.3 (2016): 360–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunsford, Andrea A. and John J. Ruszkiewicz. Everything’s an Argument. 6th edition. New York: Bedford, 2012. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Susan. Textual Carnivals: The Politics of Composition. Carbondale: U of Southern Illinois P, 1993. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Educational Statistics. Classification of Instructional Programs 2010 (2009). Web.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Hilde Lindemann. “Context: Backwards, Sideways, and Forward.” Stories Matter: The Role of Narrative in Medical Ethics. Ed. Rita Charon and Martha Montello. New York: Routledge, 2002. 39–47. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York University School of Medicine. Literature Arts Medicine Database. Web. http://medhum.med.nyu.edu. Accessed 2 March 2016.

  • North, Stephen M. “The Death of Paradigm Hope, the End of Paradigm Guilt, and the Future of (Research in) Composition.” Composition in the Twenty-First Century: Crisis and Change. Ed. Lynn Z. Bloom et al. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 1996. 194–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • _________. “On the Place of Writing in Higher Education (and Why it Doesn’t Include Composition).” The Changing of Knowledge in Composition. Ed. Lance Massey and Richard C. Gebhardt. Logan: Utah State UP, 2011. 11–15. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osipov, Rimma. “Do Future Bench Researchers Need Humanistic Courses in Medical School?” American Medical Association Journal of Ethics. 16.8 (2014): 604–9. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saltman, Richard B. and Ferroussier-Davis, Odile. “The Concept of Stewardship in Health Policy.” World Health Organization Bulletin 78 (2000): 732–9. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shankar, P Ravi. “Developing and Sustaining a Medical Humanities Program at KIST Medical College, Nepal.” Indian Journal of Medical Ethics 10.1 (2013): 51–3. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanshan, Gong, Yan Zhang, and Jiyue Hu. “English Forum on Medical Humanities of SMMU: An Interdisciplinary Innovative Teaching Practice.” Journal of Medical Colleges of PLA 28 (2013): 4–10. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, Johanna. “Whither (Whether) Medical Humanities? The Future of Medical Humanities and Arts in Medical Education.” Journal for Learning through the Arts 8.1 (2012). Np. Web.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, Johanna, Jack Coulehan, Delese Wear, and Martha Montello. “Medical Humanities and Their Discontents: Definitions, Critiques and Implications.” Academic Medicine 84.2 (2009): 192–8. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smit, David W. The End of Composition Studies. Carbondale: U of Southern Illinois P, 2007. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • ________. “Stephen North’s The Making of Knowledge in Composition and the Future of Composition Studies ‘Without Paradigm Hope.’” The Changing of Knowledge in Composition. Ed. Lance Massey and Richard C. Gebhardt. Logan: Utah State UP, 2011. 213–35. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travis, Phyllida, Egger, Dominique, Davies, Philip, Mechbal, Abdelhay. “Toward Better Stewardship: Concepts and Critical Issues.” Geneva: World Health Organization Evidence and Information for Policy. 2002. WHO/EIP/DP/02.48. Web.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. Health Systems: Stewardship. Web. http://www.who.int/healthsystems/stewardship/en/. Accessed 2 March 2016.

  • Writing Program Administrators. WPA Outcomes Statement for First-Year Composition (v3.0). Adopted 17 July 2014. Web. http://wpacouncil.org/positions/outcomes.html. Accessed 2 March 2016.

  • Yale School of Medicine. About the Medical Humanities and the Arts Council. Web. http://medicine.yale.edu/humanities/about/. Accessed 2 March 2016.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa M. DeTora .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

DeTora, L. (2017). Intellectual Cosmopolitanism as Stewardship in Medical Humanities and Undergraduate Writing Pedagogy. In: Hilger, S. (eds) New Directions in Literature and Medicine Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51988-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics