Skip to main content
Book cover

Probation pp 179–196Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan

What Are the Costs and Benefits of Probation?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1327 Accesses

Abstract

Probation is an elastic sanction, and one that occurs in the community. The elasticity of the sanction means that it can be tailored to an individual based on the risk and need factors, as well as the severity of the offense. Probation, unlike incarceration which is defined by total restrictions of liberty, can use the tools of supervision to achieve various degrees of liberty restriction. The flexibility of the sanction is a benefit but the costs related to supervision depend on the degree to which the program features are proportional to the offense, are parsimonious, reinforce citizenship, and affect social justice. This chapter reviews the costs and benefits of community sanctions that affect the justice system, the individual probationer, and the community. In total, probation has a number of attributes, but the consideration of these costs and benefits is important as systems are further developed and probation emerges as a preferred sanction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Boyd, S. J., Fang, L. J., Medoff, D. R., Dixon, L. B., & Gorelick, D. A. (2012). Use of a “microecological technique” to study crime incidents around methadone maintenance treatment centers. Addiction, 107(9), 1632–1638. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03872.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Crewe, B. (2012). Depth, weight, tightness: Revisiting the pains of imprisonment. Punishment and Society, 13(5), 509–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake, E. K. (2012). “What works” in community supervision: Interim report (Document No. 11-12-1201). Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy. Retrieved from http://www.wsipp.wa.gov/ReportFile/1094

  • Durnescu, I. (2011). Pains of probation: Effective practice and human rights. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55, 530–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haney, C. (2005). Reforming punishment: The psychological limits to the pains of punishment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maruna, S. (2001). Making good. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, F. (2012). Four forms of supervision: Towards an interdisciplinary perspective. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 17(1), 18–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2014). The growth of incarceration in the United States: Exploring causes and consequences. In Committee on Causes and Consequences of High Rates of Incarceration, J. Travis, B. Western, & S. Redburn (Eds.). Committee on Law and Justice, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersilia, J., & Deschenes, E. (1994). Perceptions of punishment: Inmates and staff rank the severity of prison versus intermediate sanctions. Prison Journal, 74(3), 306–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piat, M. (2000). Becoming the victim: A study on community reactions towards group homes. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 24(2), 108–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taxman, F. S. (2008). No illusions: Offender and organizational change in Maryland’s Proactive Community Supervision efforts. Criminology & Public Policy, 7(2), 275–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taxman, F. S. (2012). Probation, intermediate sanctions, and community-based corrections. In J. Petersilia & K. Reitz (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of sentencing and corrections (pp. 363–385). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taxman, F. S. & Rhine, E. (2015). Markers of probation: Exploring measures of supervision. Los Angeles, CA: 2nd World Congress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonry, M. (2006). Purposes and functions of sentencing. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 34). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Taxman, F.S., Maass, S. (2016). What Are the Costs and Benefits of Probation?. In: McNeill, F., Durnescu, I., Butter, R. (eds) Probation. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51982-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51982-5_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-51980-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-51982-5

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics