Conclusions: The Ecology of Language and Biliteracy in the Kumaun and Beyond

  • Cynthia Groff
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Minority Languages and Communities book series (PSMLC)

Abstract

This concluding chapter uses the ecology of language metaphor and the continua of biliteracy to highlight significant themes from the ethnography and their connection to broader themes, including the contexts of and relationships among languages, language learning and language use for teaching and learning, and local values and identities. The influence of language on community relationships parallels the ecological relationships among the languages themselves. The value of multilingualism is expressed nationally and locally as acceptance of diversity within a united community. Yet power relations cannot be ignored. Is there really unity in diversity? Discourses vary depending on the lens or depending on what scale is being considered. Practical and theoretical implications are drawn for policy, pedagogy, and research—for young women as they experience and negotiate multiple discourses in their communities.

Bibliography

  1. Annamalai, E. (2001). Managing multilingualism in India: Political and linguistic manifestation (Vol. 8). New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Cummins, J. (2007, November). Pedagogies of choice in educating bilingual students. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Language, Education and Diversity, Hamilton.Google Scholar
  3. Grierson, G. A. (1927). Linguistic survey of India. Calcutta: Government of India.Google Scholar
  4. Hastings, A. (2008). Licked by the mother tongue: Imagining everyday Sanskrit at home and in the world. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 18(1), 24–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hornberger, N. H. (2002). Multilingual language policies and the continua of biliteracy: An ecological approach. Language Policy, 1(1), 27–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hornberger, N. H., & Skilton-Sylvester, E. (2003). Revisiting the continua of biliteracy: International and critical perspectives. In N. H. Hornberger (Ed.), Continua of biliteracy: An ecological framework for educational policy, research, and practice in multilingual settings (pp. 35–67). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  7. Hornberger, N. H., & Vaish, V. (2009). Multilingual language policy and school linguistic practice: Globalization and English-language teaching in India, Singapore and South Africa. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Educational Researcher, 39(3), 305–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jhingran, D. (2005). Language disadvantage: The learning challenge in primary education. New Delhi: A.P.H. Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. Jørgensen, J. N. (2008). Polylingual languaging around and among children and adolescents. International Journal of Multilingualism, 5(3), 161–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Khubchandani, L. M. (1992). Tribal identity: A language and communication perspective. New Delhi: Indian Institute of Advanced Study, Indus Publishing.Google Scholar
  11. Khubchandani, L. M. (2001). Language demography and language education. In C. J. Daswani (Ed.), Language education in multilingual India. New Delhi: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  12. Khubchandani, L. M. (2003). Defining mother tongue education in plurilingual contexts. Language Policy, 2, 239–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lo Bianco, J. (2001, February 24–27). What is the problem? A study of official English. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Applied Linguistics, St. Louis. (ERIC document reproduction service no. ED 461 998).Google Scholar
  14. Makoni, S., & Pennycook, A. (Eds.). (2007). Disinventing and reconstituting languages. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  15. Pak, H. R. (2003). When MT is L2: The Korean church school as a context. In N. H. Hornberger (Ed.), Continua of biliteracy: An ecological framework for educational policy, research, and practice in multilingual settings (pp. 269–290). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  16. Pandit, P. B. (1975). The linguistic survey of India: Perspectives on language use. In S. Ohannessian, C. A. Ferguson, & E. Polomé (Eds.), Language surveys in developing nations: Papers and reports on sociolinguistic surveys (pp. 70–85). Arlington: Center for Applied Linguistics. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 104 170).Google Scholar
  17. Rajagopalan, S. (2001). State and nation in South Asia. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  18. Street, B. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Vaish, V. (2004). Vidyashakti: Biliteracy and empowerment in India. The continua of biliteracy in action. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cynthia Groff
    • 1
  1. 1.Leiden UniversityThe HagueThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations