Advertisement

Conclusions: Moving Beyond the Enduring Dichotomies in ELT

Chapter
  • 552 Downloads
Part of the Language and Globalization book series (LAGL)

Abstract

In the previous chapters, I have analyzed the practices and policies of English language-teaching and learning as they are reworked in the CSU context. In so doing, many of the classroom examples and participant narratives illustrated the ways teachers, students, and administrators in China were seeking to use and control English as a symbol and signification of modernity and progress. I started the book with chapters that discussed the history of English in China and how the PRC has used English in its education policy as a means to meet the needs of the state and further its goals in terms of the “four modernizations” in agriculture, industry, national defense, and science and technology (Mao and Min, 2004). In many ways, the chapters have attempted to examine not simply how Western or state conceptions of modernity have been applied or resisted; rather, I have looked for instances in which a dialogue about teaching or a classroom practice has revealed how progress, modernity, and internationalization is being constructed and framed both in relation to East–West oppositions and outside of them. As Ong (2005) has noted in other writings on Chinese culture, I have looked into the “everyday practices of having a modern Chinese subjectivity” (p. 27), and analyzed how, in those practices, English learning and teaching have come to signify divergent aspects of having an international perspective and identity in China for different participants both local and foreign—from my student Guy, to myself, to Vice-Chancellor Tsing, to the Chinese MOE.

Keywords

Language Learning Chinese Student Novice Teacher Digital Storytelling Applied Linguistic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Appiah, K. (2006). Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a world of strangers. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
  2. Bailey, B. (2007). Heteroglossia and boundaries. In M. Heller (Ed.), Bilingualism: A social approach (pp. 257–276). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauman, Z. (2001). Identity in the globalizing world. Social Anthropology, 9(2), 121–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benesch, S. (2001). Critical English for academic purposes: Theory, politics, and practices. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, D. (2014). Principles of language learning and teaching (6th ed.). White Plains, NY: Pearson.Google Scholar
  6. Canagarajah, S. (2003). Critical academic writing and multilingual students. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  7. Canagarajah, S. (2005). Accommodating tensions in language-in-education policies: An afterward. In A. L. Lin & P. Martin (Eds.), Decolonisation, globalisation: Language-in-education policy and practice (pp. 194–201). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  8. Canagarajah, S. (2013a). Translingual practice: Global Englishes and cosmopolitan realities. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Canagarajah, S. (Ed.). (2013b). Litearcy as translingual practice: Between communities and classrooms. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Cook, G. (2000). Language play, language learning. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Duff, P. (2002). The discursive co-construction of knowledge, identity, and difference: An ethnography of communication in the high school mainstream. Applied Linguistics, 23(3), 289–322. doi:  10.1093/applin/23.3.289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Education First (2015). [Graph of English proficiency in China from 2015 survey] The world’s largest ranking of countries by English skills. Retrieved from http://www.ef.edu/epi/regions/asia/china/
  13. Edwards, R., & Usher, R. (2008). Globalisation and pedagogy (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Feng, A. W. (2011). Introduction: The apex of “the third wave”—English language across greater China. In A. W. Feng (Ed.), English language education across greater China (pp. 1–20). Bristol, England: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  16. Hu, G. W. (2005). Contextual influences on instructional practices: A Chinese case for an ecological approach to ELT. TESOL Quarterly, 39, 635–660. doi:  10.2307/3588525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Irvine, J., & Gal, S. (2000). Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In P. Kroskrity (Ed.), Regimes of language: Ideologies, polities, and identities (pp. 35–84). Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
  18. Kramsch, C. (2006). The multilingual subject. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(1), 97–110. doi:  10.1111/j.1473-4192.2006.00109.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Beyond methods: Macrostrategies for language teaching. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From method to postmethod. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Mao, L., & Min, Y. (2004). Foreign language education in the PRC. In M. Zhou (Ed.), Language policy in the People’s Republic of China: Theory and practice since 1949 (pp. 319–329). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Morgan, B. (1998). The ESL classroom: Teaching, critical practice, and community development. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nunan, D. (2005). Task-based language teaching. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Ong, A. (1999). Flexible citizenship. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Ong, A. (2005). Anthropological concepts in the study of nationalism. In P. Nyíri & J. Breidenbach (Eds.), China inside out: Contemporary Chinese nationalism and transnationalism (pp. 1–34). Budapest, Hungary: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Park, J. (2009). The local construction of a global language: Ideologies of English in South Korea. Berlin, Germany: Mouton De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Park, J., & Lo, A. (Eds.). (2012). Globalization, multilingualism, and identity in transnational perspective: The case of South Korea. Special issue of Journal of Sociolinguistics, 16(2). doi:  10.1111/j.1467-9841.2011.00524.x
  28. Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Phillipson, R. (2009). Linguistic imperialism continued. Hyderabad, India: Orient BlackSwan Private Limited.Google Scholar
  30. Ramanathan, V. (2002). The politics of TESOL education: Writing, knowledge, and critical pedagogy. New York, NY: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  31. Ramanathan, V. (2006). Of texts AND translations AND rhizomes: Postcolonial anxieties AND deracinations AND knowledge constructions. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 3(4), 223–244. doi:  10.1207/s15427587clis0304_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ramanathan, V., & Morgan, M. (2007). TESOL and policy enactments: Perspectives from policy. TESOL Quarterly, 41(3), 447–463. doi:  10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00080.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Savignon, S. (2001). Communicative language teaching. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd ed., pp. 13–28). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
  34. Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (2000). Linguistic genocide in education or worldwide diversity and human rights? Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  35. Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (2006). Language policy and linguistic human rights. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and method (pp. 273–291). Hobokken, NJ: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  36. Sullivan, P. (2000). Playfulness as mediation in communicative language teaching in a Vietnamese classroom. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 115–132). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Tollefson, J. (1991). Planning language, planning inequality. New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
  38. Tomlinson, J. (1999). Globalization and culture. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  39. Watson-Gegeo, K. (2004). Mind, language, and epistemology: Toward a language socialization paradigm for SLA. The Modern Language Journal, 88, 331–350. doi:  10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.00233.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhang, Y., & Zhao, X. (2015). English skills slip in China: Survey. China Daily USA. Retrieved from http://usa.chinadaily.com.cn/index.html

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hunter CollegeCity University of New YorkNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations