Advertisement

Global and Local Citizens and the Creation of a Teaching Community at CSU

Chapter
  • 543 Downloads
Part of the Language and Globalization book series (LAGL)

Abstract

I still vividly recall the first words spoken by the then director of the ELC in 2004 to the foreign teachers at a welcome dinner after we had arrived at CSU on complimentary air tickets: “Welcome to China, you have come to reform English language teaching.” Few of us had lived in China or could speak Mandarin Chinese fluently at the time, let alone had any knowledge of Cantonese or any other local dialects; it was simply the case that our education and cultural backgrounds gave us the expertise to come as reformers to CSU. As further investigated in this chapter, these internationalizing desires and emphasis on foreign teachers as reformers would come to have complex effects on the teaching identities, classroom practices, and community-building of CSU teachers. In keeping with the goal of this book, which is to move away from entrenched dichotomies and modes of analysis, this first data chapter further introduces the CSU context through an analysis of local and foreign relationships both inside and outside the classroom. Specifically, this chapter examines the tensions inherent in the national and local English-teaching policies summarized in Chap.  1, and the simultaneous local and global influences and orientations of CSU teachers, students, and administrators.

Keywords

Extracurricular Activity English Learning Dominant Discourse Chinese Teacher English Teaching 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Blommaert, J. (2013). Citizenship, language, and superdiversity: Towards complexity. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 12(3), 193–196. doi: 10.1080/15348458.2013.797276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blommaert, J., & Backus, A. (2012). Superdiverse repertoires and the individual. Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies, paper 24. Retrieved from https://www.tilburguniversity.edu/upload/d53816c1-f163-4ae4-b74c-0942b30bdd61_tpcs%20paper24.pdf
  3. Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Grimshaw, T. (2010). Styling the occidental other: Interculturality in Chinese University performances. Language and Intercultural Communication, 10(3), 243–258. doi: 10.1080/14708470903348564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. He, H. (2001). Dictionary of the political thought of the People’s Republic of China. London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Hessler, P. (2001). River town: Two years of the Yangtze. New York, NY: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  8. Holliday, A. (1999). Small cultures. Applied Linguistics, 20(2), 237–264. doi: 10.1093/applin/20.2.237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Liu, J., & Xiao, P. (2011). A new model in English language teaching in China: The case of Shantou University. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 34(3), 39–53. doi: 10.1515/cjal.2011.023.Google Scholar
  10. Luke, A. (2004). Two takes on the critical. In B. Norton & K. Toohey (Eds.), Critical pedagogy and language learning (pp. 21–29). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Menard-Warwick, J. (2013). “The world doesn’t end at the corner of their street”: Language ideologies of Chilean English teachers. In V. Ramanathan (Ed.), Language policies and (dis)citizenship: Rights, access, pedagogies (pp. 73–91). Bristol, England: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  12. Nunan, D. (2005). Task-based language teaching. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Osnos, E. (2008, April 28). Crazy English: The national scramble to learn a new language before the Olympics. New Yorker. Retrieved from http://www.newyorker.com/
  14. Ramanathan, V. (Ed.). (2013a). Language policies and (dis)citizenship: Rights, access, pedagogies. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  15. Ramanathan, V. (2013b). Language policies and (dis)citizenship: Who belongs? Who is a guest? Who is deported? Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 12(3), 162–166. doi: 10.1080/15348458.2013.797250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Savignon, S. (2001). Communicative language teaching. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd ed., pp. 13–28). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
  17. Stanley, P. (2013). A critical ethnography of ‘Westerners’ teaching in China: Shanghaied in Shanghai. London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Steger, M., & Roy, R. (2010). Neoliberalism: A very short introduction. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Volodzko, D. (2015, October 19). Feminism with Chinese characteristics. The Diplomat. Retrieved from http://thediplomat.com/
  20. Warring, H. Z. (2009). Moving out of IRF (Initiation-Response-Feedback): A single case analysis. Language Learning, 59(4), 796–824. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00526.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hunter CollegeCity University of New YorkNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations