Abstract
I still vividly recall the first words spoken by the then director of the ELC in 2004 to the foreign teachers at a welcome dinner after we had arrived at CSU on complimentary air tickets: “Welcome to China, you have come to reform English language teaching.” Few of us had lived in China or could speak Mandarin Chinese fluently at the time, let alone had any knowledge of Cantonese or any other local dialects; it was simply the case that our education and cultural backgrounds gave us the expertise to come as reformers to CSU. As further investigated in this chapter, these internationalizing desires and emphasis on foreign teachers as reformers would come to have complex effects on the teaching identities, classroom practices, and community-building of CSU teachers. In keeping with the goal of this book, which is to move away from entrenched dichotomies and modes of analysis, this first data chapter further introduces the CSU context through an analysis of local and foreign relationships both inside and outside the classroom. Specifically, this chapter examines the tensions inherent in the national and local English-teaching policies summarized in Chap. 1, and the simultaneous local and global influences and orientations of CSU teachers, students, and administrators.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The transcripts in the book use the following notation symbols:
(( )) = Description or summary of participant/s action
(?) = Question/ Rising tone
CAPS = Emphasis/falling tone
… = Short pause of less than one second
(1.0) = Pause of one second
Sts = Students
S = Student
- 2.
As described in Chap. 1, the CET stands for College English Test and has two proficiency levels (Band 4 and Band 6) that students take in order to demonstrate their abilities in English when seeking jobs.
- 3.
Often critiqued for being teacher-centered and more focused on what the teacher wants to hear than encouraging student creativity and authentic communication, the IRF sequence (teacher initiation–student response–teacher feedback) or IRE methods (teacher initiation-student response-teacher evaluation) are still dominant aspects of teacher and student discourse in ESL classrooms (Warring, 2009).
References
Blommaert, J. (2013). Citizenship, language, and superdiversity: Towards complexity. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 12(3), 193–196. doi:10.1080/15348458.2013.797276.
Blommaert, J., & Backus, A. (2012). Superdiverse repertoires and the individual. Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies, paper 24. Retrieved from https://www.tilburguniversity.edu/upload/d53816c1-f163-4ae4-b74c-0942b30bdd61_tpcs%20paper24.pdf
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Grimshaw, T. (2010). Styling the occidental other: Interculturality in Chinese University performances. Language and Intercultural Communication, 10(3), 243–258. doi:10.1080/14708470903348564.
Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
He, H. (2001). Dictionary of the political thought of the People’s Republic of China. London, England: Routledge.
Hessler, P. (2001). River town: Two years of the Yangtze. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
Holliday, A. (1999). Small cultures. Applied Linguistics, 20(2), 237–264. doi:10.1093/applin/20.2.237.
Liu, J., & Xiao, P. (2011). A new model in English language teaching in China: The case of Shantou University. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 34(3), 39–53. doi:10.1515/cjal.2011.023.
Luke, A. (2004). Two takes on the critical. In B. Norton & K. Toohey (Eds.), Critical pedagogy and language learning (pp. 21–29). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Menard-Warwick, J. (2013). “The world doesn’t end at the corner of their street”: Language ideologies of Chilean English teachers. In V. Ramanathan (Ed.), Language policies and (dis)citizenship: Rights, access, pedagogies (pp. 73–91). Bristol, England: Multilingual Matters.
Nunan, D. (2005). Task-based language teaching. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Osnos, E. (2008, April 28). Crazy English: The national scramble to learn a new language before the Olympics. New Yorker. Retrieved from http://www.newyorker.com/
Ramanathan, V. (Ed.). (2013a). Language policies and (dis)citizenship: Rights, access, pedagogies. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
Ramanathan, V. (2013b). Language policies and (dis)citizenship: Who belongs? Who is a guest? Who is deported? Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 12(3), 162–166. doi:10.1080/15348458.2013.797250.
Savignon, S. (2001). Communicative language teaching. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd ed., pp. 13–28). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
Stanley, P. (2013). A critical ethnography of ‘Westerners’ teaching in China: Shanghaied in Shanghai. London, England: Routledge.
Steger, M., & Roy, R. (2010). Neoliberalism: A very short introduction. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Volodzko, D. (2015, October 19). Feminism with Chinese characteristics. The Diplomat. Retrieved from http://thediplomat.com/
Warring, H. Z. (2009). Moving out of IRF (Initiation-Response-Feedback): A single case analysis. Language Learning, 59(4), 796–824. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00526.x.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McPherron, P. (2017). Global and Local Citizens and the Creation of a Teaching Community at CSU. In: Internationalizing Teaching, Localizing Learning. Language and Globalization. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51954-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51954-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-51953-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-51954-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)