Skip to main content

Pre-modern Power Elites: Princes, Courts, Intermediaries

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Political Elites

Abstract

This chapter provides a global view of pre-modern elites. Dynastic rule predominates in history; it molded the shape of elites worldwide. Rulers’ offspring held elite status, and their alliances created a second elite. In addition to these two core groups, various types of servants can be found in most domains: domestics, administrators, soldiers, and spiritual leaders. Which forms of recruitment and legitimization can be found for these functional elites? Is it possible to establish regional typologies? How did these elites relate to the ruler, and how did their interaction take shape? How powerful were rulers, often styled as omnipotent? What tied the intermediary elites to the court, and what alienated them? The chapter closes with a brief comparison of pre-modern and modern political practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alderson, A. D. (1956). The Structure of the Ottoman Dynasty. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balazs, E. (1965). Political Theory and Administrative Reality in Traditional China. London: University of London Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crone, P. (1980). Slaves on Horses: The Evolution of the Islamic Polity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Duindam, J. (2016). Dynasties: A Global History of Power, 1300–1800. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ebrey, P. (2006). Succession to High Office: The Chinese Case. In D. R. Olson & M. Cole (Eds.), Technology, Literacy, and the Evolution of Society: Implications of the Work of Jack Goody (pp. 49–71). Mahwah: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. (1983). The Court Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, M. C. (2001). The Manchu Way: The Eight Banners and Ethnic Identity in Late Imperial China. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, J. H., & Brockliss, L. W. B. (Eds.). (1999). The World of the Favourite. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elman, B. A. (2000). A Cultural History of Civil Examinations in Late Imperial China. Berkeley/Los Angeles: California University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goody, J. (1970). Sideways or Downwards? Lateral and Vertical Succession, Inheritance and Descent in Africa and Eurasia. Man, 5(4), 627–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guy, R. K. (2010). Qing Governors and Their Provinces: The Evolution of Territorial Administration in China, 1644–1796. Seattle: Washington University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khaldun, Ibn (1967). The Muqaddimah. An Introduction to History (Franz Rosenthal, Ed.). Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunt, I. M. (1983). The Sultan’s Servants: The Transformation of Ottoman Provincial Government, 1550–1650. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, V. (2003). Strange Parallels: Southeast Asia in Global Context, c. 800–1830, 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machiavelli, N. (1961). The Prince. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magdalino, P. (1997). In Search of the Byzantine Courtier: Leo Choirosphaktes and Constantine Manasses. In H. Maguire (Ed.), Byzantine Court Culture from 829 to 1204. Dumbarton Oaks: Dumbarton Oaks and Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawski, E. S. (1998). The Last Emperors: A Social History of Qing Imperial Institutions. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, H. (Ed.). (1995). The European Nobilities in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries, 2 vols. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Syme, R. (1939). The Roman Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tardits, C. (1987). Princes & serviteurs du royaume: cinq Ă©tudes de monarchies africaines. Paris: SociĂ©tĂ© d’ethnographie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tougher, S. (2002). Eunuchs in Antiquity and Beyond. Swansea/London: The Classical Press of Wales and Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society. An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, E. R. (2015). Chinese History. A New Manual. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zmora, H. (2001). Monarchy, Aristocracy, and the State in Europe. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Duindam, J. (2018). Pre-modern Power Elites: Princes, Courts, Intermediaries. In: Best, H., Higley, J. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Political Elites. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51904-7_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics