Skip to main content

The Sea in Pericles

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Palgrave Shakespeare Studies ((PASHST))

Abstract

By the time Shakespeare and Wilkins’s Pericles (1608) was written, English trading into the Levant had grown to significant volumes, and a permanent English consul had been based for nearly 20 years in Aleppo, with a remit that included Tripoli, Aleppo, Damascus, Jerusalem, Amman, and all other port cities in Syria and Palestine, among them Tharsus, Antioch and Tyre. This essay explores the ways in which the contemporary aspirations of English merchants and diplomats in the Levant are subtly registered in a play that has its main character voyaging across the sea, dealing in grain, and acquiring kingdoms by diplomacy or marriage. The main focus is on the meaning of the sea as a geopolitical space and itself a dramatic agent in the play.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The identification of Pentapolis as Cyrene is longstanding among Shakespearean editors, though other locations have been suggested. For recent discussions, see McJannet (1998, 91–2) and Hanna (2002, 115–21).

  2. 2.

    Hanna considers the six locations specifically from the perspective of what Shakespeare may have known about them.

  3. 3.

    On Shakespeare’s engagement with Greece more generally, see Hanna (1998).

  4. 4.

    Hunt relates the play to the Acts of the Apostles, arguing that the voyage of St Paul, who was born in Tarsus, spent time in Ephesus and visited Antioch, ‘occupies part of the foreground of the play’ (Hunt 2002, 134).

  5. 5.

    On Biddulph and his response to the landscape of the Levant see MacLean (2004a).

  6. 6.

    Ortelius’s map of the peregrinations of St Paul (‘Peregrinationis Divi Pauli Typus Cartographicus’) is reprinted in McJannet (1998, 89); his map of the Roman empire (‘Romani Imperii Imago’) is reprinted by Gossett (2004, 130).

  7. 7.

    On the history of the Levant Company, see Epstein (1908) and Wood (1964).

  8. 8.

    On English trade in the Mediterranean, see Davis (1961).

  9. 9.

    For an overview of the Company’s factories in the Levant see Wood (1964, 59–79).

  10. 10.

    All Pericles citations are taken from W. Shakespeare and G. Wilkins, Pericles, ed. Suzanne Gossett, The Arden Shakespeare (London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2004).

  11. 11.

    A rare exception is Relihan (1992).

  12. 12.

    On maritime (and many other) themes in The Tempest, see Hulme and Sherman (2000); on the sea in Antony and Cleopatra, see Klein (2004, 97–9) and Publicover (2014).

  13. 13.

    On shipwreck in Shakespeare, see Habermann (2012).

  14. 14.

    On the Jonah story and Pericles, see Dean (2000).

  15. 15.

    See, for example, the New Cambridge edition of Pericles, which devotes a whole section to ‘Journeys’ in the introduction (DelVecchio and Hammond 1998, 58–61). I do not share the editors’ impression that ‘characters find themselves in constant transit… between one location and another’ (59) since only a handful of characters out of a very large cast undertake any travelling at all.

  16. 16.

    These eight journeys are broken up into two periods of frequent voyaging. In the first three acts, Pericles sails from Antioch to Tyre (1), to Tarsus (2), to Pentapolis (3), back to Tarsus (4) and Tyre (5). He then sits tight in Tyre for 14 years, before undertaking his final journeys: Tyre to Tarsus (6), Mytilene (7) and Ephesus (8).

  17. 17.

    One nautical mile corresponds to 1852 m.

  18. 18.

    The trip between Tarsus and Tyre may indeed have taken around 24 h around 1600 (though not in antiquity) if we assume favourable winds and an average speed of c.6 knots. The estimate is confirmed by Biddulph who notes that the slightly longer trip from Cyprus to Jaffa is ‘not two daies sailing… with a good winde’ (Biddulph 1609, G.ii.r). By ‘two daies’, Biddulph presumably means under 36 h.

  19. 19.

    These circumstances are deliberately exaggerated in the play. In the source text by Twine it takes the coffin 2 days to reach Ephesus from a location much further west than Tarsus, and the narrator explains that it was dragged westward by the tide while the ship sailed on in the other direction (Twine 1594[?], G.iiij.v). In Gower’s Confessio Amantis, the decision to make for Tarsus is taken only after the coffin has been committed to the waves.

  20. 20.

    Hanna sees Pericles as an early modern revenant ‘of the intelligent, enduring Greek seafarer’ (Hanna 1998, 114).

  21. 21.

    On Mediterranean navigation in the sixteenth century, see Braudel (2000, 77–109); on the distinction between coasting and navigation in early modern times, see Waters (1978).

  22. 22.

    A Dutch mile is roughly equivalent to an English league, or 5 km.

  23. 23.

    The comment is often quoted (see, for example, Gossett 2004, 129; Roebuck and Maguire 2010, 39).

  24. 24.

    For an opposing view see Cormack (2001, 162) and his revised reading (Cormack 2008, 282). For a view of Pericles as a ‘colonizer’, see Mentz (2009, 71).

  25. 25.

    Steven Mullaney also notes the mercantile references in Pericles, especially in the brothel scenes, and draws an analogy with the commercial theatres in London (Mullaney 1988, 135–51).

  26. 26.

    The capitulation was printed by Richard Hakluyt in The Principal Navigations, both in the first edition (1589) and in the expanded second edition (1598–1600). For the full text of the capitulation, including translation and analysis, see Skilliter (1977, 86–104). For the historical context, see İnalcık (1994, 368).

  27. 27.

    For some thoughts on maritime labour in the play, see Vitkus (2010).

  28. 28.

    For an extended discussion of the significance of the armour, see Roebuck and Maguire (2010).

  29. 29.

    The remarks occur in a letter sent by the English factor John Sanderson to the Levant Company on 25 May 1600.

  30. 30.

    The entry is dated 3 June 1600. See also Wood (1964, 25–6).

  31. 31.

    The argument has been made persuasively by MacLean (2004b).

Works Cited

  • Andreadis, H. 2001. Sappho in Early Modern England. Female Same-Sex Literary Erotics, 1550–1714. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biddulph, W. 1609. The trauels of certaine Englishmen into Africa, Asia, Troy, Bythinia, Thracia, and to the Blacke Sea. And into Syria, Cilicia, Pisidia, Mesopotamia, Damascus, Canaan, Galile, Samaria, Iudea, Palestina, Ierusalem, Iericho, and to the Red Sea: and to Sundry Other Places. London: Th. Haueland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braudel, F. 2000. The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Philip II, vol. 1. Translated by S. Reynolds. London: Folio Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. 1997. “A Reconstructed Text of Pericles, Prince of Tyre”. In The Norton Shakespeare, edited by S. Greenblatt et al. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connery, C.L. 2006. “There was No More Sea: The Supersession of the Ocean, from the Bible to Cyberspace”. Journal of Historical Geography 32: 494–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cormack, B. 2001. “Marginal Waters: Pericles and the Idea of Jurisdiction”. In Literature, Mapping, and the Politics of Space in Early Modern Britain, edited by A. Gordon and B. Klein. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cormack, B. 2008. A Power to Do Justice: Jurisdiction, English Literature, and the Rise of the Common Law, 1509–1625. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R. 1961. “England and the Mediterranean, 1570–1670”. In Essays in the Economic and Social History of Tudor and Stuart England, edited by F.J. Fisher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, P. 2000. “Pericles’s Pilgrimage”. Essays in Criticism 50: 125–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DelVecchio, D., and A. Hammond. 1998. “Introduction”. In W. Shakespeare, Pericles, Prince of Tyre, edited by D. DelVecchio and A. Hammond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domínguez, L.L. 2009. “Pericles’ ‘unknown travels’: The Dimensions of Geography in Shakespeare’s Pericles”. Sederi 19: 71–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donne, J. 1971. The Complete English Poems. Edited by A.J. Smith. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, M. 1908. The Early History of the Levant Company. London: George Routledge & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, F. 1964. Shakespeare and the Sea. London: Constable.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, W. (ed.). 1931. The Travels of John Sanderson in the Levant, 1584–1602. London: Hakluyt Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillies, J. 2003. “Place and Space in Three Late Plays”. In A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works, edited by R. Dutton and J. Howard, vol. 4. The Poems, Problem Comedies, Late Plays. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gossett, S. 2004. ‘Introduction’. In W. Shakespeare and G. Wilkins, Pericles, edited by S. Gossett. Arden 3. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grainger, R. 2008. Theatre and Relationships in Shakespeare’s Later Plays. Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Great Britain. 1897. Calendar of State Papers, Venetian. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermann, I. 2012. “‘I shall have share in this most happy wreck’: Shakespeare’s Topology of Shipwrecking”. Shakespeare-Jahrbuch 148: 55–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, R. 1997. Shakespeare Among the Moderns. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, S. 1998. “Shakespeare’s Greek World: The Temptations of the Sea”. In Playing the Globe: Genre and Geography in English Renaissance Drama, edited by J. Gillies and V.M. Vaughan. Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, S. 2002. “Studying Pericles through Sacred Geography, or Sailing to Paradise”. In Selected Comedies and Late Romances of Shakespeare, edited by E.B. Batson. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, P. 1996. “‘Travelling Hopefully’: The Dramatic Form of Journeys in English Renaissance Drama”. In Travel and Drama in Shakespeare’s Time, edited by J.-P. Maquerlot and M. Willems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, L. 2000. “‘The Shores of My Mortality’: Pericles’ Greece of the Mind”. In Pericles. Critical Essays, edited by D. Skeele. New York: Garland Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulme, P., and W. Sherman (eds.). 2000. ‘The Tempest’ and Its Travels. London: Reaktion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, M. 2002. “Shakespeare’s Pericles and the Acts of the Apostles”. In Selected Comedies and Late Romances of Shakespeare, edited by E.B. Batson. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • İnalcık, H. 1994. “Part I. The Ottoman State: Economy and Society, 1300–1600”. In An Economic and Social History of the Ottoman Empire, 1300–1914, edited by H. Inalcik and D. Quataert. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M.P. 1975. “North’s Plutarch and the Name ‘Escanes’ in Shakespeare’s Pericles”. Notes & Queries 22: 173–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, B. 2004. “Staying Afloat: Literary Shipboard Encounters from Columbus to Equiano”. In Sea Changes. Historicizing the Ocean, edited by B. Klein and G. Mackenthun. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLean, G. 2004a. “Strolling in Syria with William Biddulph”. Criticism 46(3): 415–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacLean, G. 2004b. The Rise of Oriental Travel. English Visitors to the Ottoman Empire, 1580–1720. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • McJannet, L. 1998. “Genre and Geography: The Eastern Mediterranean in Pericles and The Comedy of Errors”. In Playing the Globe. Genre and Geography in English Renaissance Drama, edited by J. Gillies and V.M. Vaughan. Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mentz, S. 2009. At the Bottom of Shakespeare’s Ocean. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullaney, S. 1988. The Place of the Stage. License, Play, and Power in Renaissance England. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palfrey, S. 1997. Late Shakespeare. A New World of Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Publicover, L. 2014. “Shakespeare at Sea”. Essays in Criticism 64(2): 138–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ralegh, W. 1614. The History of the World. London: Walter Burre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Relihan, C.C. 1992. “Liminal Geography: Pericles and the Politics of Place”. Philological Quarterly 71: 281–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roebuck T., and L. Maguire. 2010. “Pericles and the Language of National Origins”. In This England, that Shakespeare. New Angles on Englishness and the Bard, edited by W. Maley and M. Tudeau-Clayton. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shalit, Y. 1999. “European Foreigners in Damascus and Aleppo during the Late Ottoman Period”. In Modern Syria. From Ottoman Rule to Pivotal Role in the Middle East, edited by M. Ma’oz et al. Brighton: Sussex Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skeele, D. 2000. “Pericles in Criticism and Production: A Brief History”. In Pericles. Critical Essays, edited by D. Skeele. New York: Garland Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skilliter, S.A. 1977. William Harborne and the Trade with Turkey, 1578–1582. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, P. 2001. The Social Construction of the Ocean. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twine, L. 1594[?]. The Patterne of painefull Aduentures. London: Valentine Simms.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitkus, D. 2010. “Labor and Travel on the Early Modern Stage: Representing the Travail of Travel in Dekker’s Old Fortunatus and Shakespeare’s Pericles”. In Working Subjects in Early Modern English Drama, edited by M.M. Dowd and N. Korda. Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waghenaer, L.J. 1596. Thresoor der Zee-Vaerdt. Amsterdam: Cornelis Claesz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, R. 2004. ‘Introduction’. In W. Shakespeare Pericles, Prince of Tyre, edited by R. Warren. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, D.W. 1978. The Art of Navigation in England in Elizabethan and Stuart Times, 3 vols. Greenwich: National Maritime Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, A.C. 1964. A History of the Levant Company. London: Cass.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Klein, B. (2016). The Sea in Pericles . In: Habermann, I., Witen, M. (eds) Shakespeare and Space. Palgrave Shakespeare Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51835-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics