Advertisement

Substantive Representation: From Timing to Framing of Family Law Reform in Morocco, South Africa and Uganda

  • Ragnhild L. Muriaas
  • Liv Tønnessen
  • Vibeke Wang
Chapter
Part of the Citizenship, Gender and Diversity book series (FEMCIT)

Abstract

This chapter argues that an essential factor affecting the prospects of successful substantive representation of women is whether or not the protagonists of family law reform are able to frame their claims in a manner that is acceptable to both the public and the ruling elite. It adopts a “thick” conception of substantive representation which takes into account how representation occurs as well as its outcome. Through a “most different” comparative strategy, the authors study how and through what mechanisms family law reforms in Morocco, South Africa and Uganda occurred. In Morocco, the 2004 family law reform was more comprehensive and closer to the original feminist demands because the process received the blessing of the Moroccan king and was pushed through in a top-down manner. In the case of South Africa and Uganda, however, the initial law reform proposal had to undergo more substantial changes in scope and content, as more veto players needed to be on board for the proposal to be successfully enacted. The analysis finds that women’s feminist claims for equality have been negotiated to gain cultural resonance through processes of framing and reframing the claims to appeal to critical audiences. Pro-women actors, such as women activists inside and outside government, took center stage in this process. Additionally, male actors—who acted as intermediaries or leveraged the key government positions they held—also played vital roles in ensuring that legislation was enacted. This indicates that while the timing of a legal reform proposal is important, the framing of the reform campaign is also critical.

Keywords

Domestic Violence Child Marriage Substantive Representation Marital Rape Domestic Relation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Andrews, P. E. (2009). Who’s afraid of polygamy? Exploring the boundaries of family, equality and custom in South Africa. Journal of Law & Family Studies, 11(2), 303–331.Google Scholar
  2. Asiimwe, J. (2002). Women and the struggle for land in Uganda. In A. M. Tripp & J. C. Kwesiga (Eds.), The women’s movement in Uganda: History, challenges, and prospects (pp. 119–137). London: Fountain.Google Scholar
  3. Bauer, G., & Britton, H. E. (2006). Women in African Parliaments: A continental shift? In G. Bauer & H. E. Britton (Eds.), Women in African Parliaments (pp. 1–30). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  4. Bennett, T. W. (2011). Legal pluralism and the family in South Africa: Lessons from customary law reform. Emory International Law Review, 25(2), 1029–1059.Google Scholar
  5. Berge, E., Kambewa, D., Munthali, A., & Wiig, H. (2014). Lineage and land reforms in Malawi: Do matrilineal and patrilineal landholding systems represent a problem for land reforms in Malawi? Land Use Policy, 41, 61–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buskens, L. (2003). Recent debates on family law in Morocco: Islamic law as politics in an emerging public sphere. Islamic Law and Society, 10(2), 70–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cavatorta, F., & Salmasso, E. (2009). Liberal outcomes through undemocratic means: The reform of the code de statut personnel in Morocco. Journal of Modern African Studies, 47(4), 487–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Celis, K., Childs, S., Kantola, J., & Krook, M. L. (2008). Rethinking women’s substantive representation. Representation, 44(2), 99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Charrad, M. (2012). Family Law Reforms in the Arab World: Tunisia and Morocco. Report for the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA) Division for Social Policy and Development Expert Group Meeting, New York, 15–17 May. Available from http://bit.ly/1F76iSz
  10. Childs, S., & Krook, M. L. (2006). Should feminists give up on critical mass? A contingent yes. Politics and Gender, 2(4), 522–530.Google Scholar
  11. Childs, S., & Krook, M. L. (2008). Critical mass theory and women’s political representation. Political Studies, 56(3), 725–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Childs, S., & Withey, J. (2006). The substantive representation of women: The case of the reduction of VAT on sanitary products. Parliamentary Affairs, 59(1), 10–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clark, J. A., & Young, A. E. (2008). Islamism and family law reform in Morocco and Jordan. Mediterranean Politics, 13(3), 333–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Collier, R. B., & Collier, D. (1991). Shaping the political arena: Critical junctures, the labor movement, and regime dynamics in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Elliott, K. Z. (2009). Reforming the Moroccan personal status code: A revolution for whom? Mediterranean Politics, 14(2), 213–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ennaji, M. (2004). “The New Muslim Personal Status Law in Morocco: Context, proponents, adversaries, and arguments”. Available from http://bit.ly/1PGvrGH
  17. Ferree, M. M. (2003). Resonance and radicalism: Feminist framing in the abortion debates of the United States and Germany. American Journal of Sociology, 109(2), 304–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Franceschet, S., & Piscopo, J. (2008). Gender quotas and women’s substantive representation: Lessons from Argentina. Politics & Gender, 4(3), 393–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Geisler, G. (2000). “Parliament Is Another Terrain of Struggle”: Women, men, and politics in South Africa. Journal of Modern African Studies, 38(4), 605–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goetz, A. M. (2002). No shortcuts to power: Constraints on women’s political effectiveness in Uganda. Journal of Modern African Studies, 40(4), 549–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gouws, A. (2004). The politics of state structures: Citizenship and the National Machinery for Women in South Africa. National Politricks, 3, 27–47.Google Scholar
  22. Harrak, F. (2009). The history and significance of the New Moroccan family code. Working Paper 09-002, Institute for the Study of Islamic Thought in Africa, Roberta Buffett Center for International and Comparative Studies, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
  23. Hassim, S. (2005). Voices, hierarchies and spaces: Reconfiguring the women’s movement in democratic South Africa. Politikon, 32(2), 175–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Joseph, S. (2000). Gendering citizenship in the middle east. In S. Joseph (Ed.), Gender and citizenship in the middle east (pp. 3–30). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Lumu, D. T., & Kaaya, S. K. (2013). Marriage bill: How Museveni killed it. The observer, 10 April. Available from http://bit.ly/1e4Sw3d
  26. Mackay, F. (2008). “Thick” conceptions of substantive representation: Women, gender and political institutions. Representation, 44(2), 125–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Matembe, M. (2002). Politics, gender and constitution making in Uganda. Kampala: Fountain Publishers.Google Scholar
  28. Mbatha, L., & Fishbayn Joffe, L. (2013). Recognition of polygamous marriages in the New South Africa. In L. Fishbayn Joffe & S. Neil (Eds.), Gender, religion, and family law: Theorizing conflicts between women’s rights and cultural traditions (pp. 190–211). Waltham, MA: Brandeis University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Moghadam, V. M., & Gheytanchi, E. (2010). Political opportunities and strategic choices: Comparing feminist campaigns in Morocco and Iran. Mobilization: An International Journal, 15(3), 267–288.Google Scholar
  30. Muriaas, R., & Wang, V. (2012). Executive dominance and the politics of quota representation in Uganda. Journal of Modern African Studies, 50(2), 309–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Oomen, B. (2005). Chiefs in South Africa: Law, power & culture in the post-apartheid era. Oxford: James Currey.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pankhurst, D. (2002). Women and politics in Africa: The case of Uganda. In K. Ross (Ed.), Women, politics, and change (pp. 119–128). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Pruzan-Jørgensen, J. (2012). Liberalization and autocracy in Morocco: The puzzle of the Moudawana reform. Saarbrücken, Germany: Lambert Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
  34. Sadiqi, F., & Ennaji, M. (2006). The feminization of public space: Women’s activism, the family law, and social change in Morocco. Journal of Middle East Women’s Studies, 2(2), 86–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. SALC (South African Law Commission). (1998). The harmonisation of the common law and the indigenous law: Report on customary marriages. Pretoria: South African Law Commission.Google Scholar
  36. Salime, Z. (2011). Between Feminism and Islam: Human Rights and Sharia Law in Morocco. Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sonneveld, N. (2011). Khul’ Divorce in Egypt: Public Debates, judicial practices, and everyday life. Cairo: American University in Cairo Press.Google Scholar
  38. Steinberg, M. (1999). The talk and back talk of collective action: A dialogic analysis of repertoires of discourse among nineteenth-century English cotton spinners. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 736–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tønnessen, L. (2013). Marriage is politics: Prospects for women’s equality after the Arab spring. Bergen, Norway: Chr. Michelsen Institute.Google Scholar
  40. Tripp, A. M. (2000). Women and politics in Uganda. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  41. Tripp, A. M. (2004). Women’s movements, customary law, and land rights in Africa: The case of Uganda. African Studies Quarterly, 7(4), 7–19.Google Scholar
  42. Tripp, A. M. (2006). Uganda: Agents of change for women’s advancement? In G. Bauer & H. E. Britton (Eds.), Women in African parliaments (pp. 111–132). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  43. Tripp, A. M., Casimiro, I., Kwesiga, J., & Mungwa, A. (2009). African women’s movements: Transforming political landscapes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Wang, V. (2013a). Operating in the shadow of the executive: Womens substantive representation in the Ugandan Parliament. Doctoral dissertation. Bergen: University of Bergen.Google Scholar
  45. Wang, V. (2013b). Women changing policy outcomes: Learning from pro-women legislation in the Ugandan Parliament. Women’s Studies International Forum, 41, 113–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yassine, N. (2006). Legal reform in Morocco: Views of a Moroccan Feminist Dissident. Available from http://www.jspublishing.net/NadiaYassineUSTourLegalReform.htm

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ragnhild L. Muriaas
    • 1
  • Liv Tønnessen
    • 2
  • Vibeke Wang
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Comparative PoliticsUniversity of BergenBergenNorway
  2. 2.Chr. Michelsen InstituteBergenNorway

Personalised recommendations