Skip to main content

Troubled and Secure Gender Identities in a Changing Society: Norway at the End of the Long Nineteenth Century

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Gendered Citizenship and the Politics of Representation

Part of the book series: Citizenship, Gender and Diversity ((FEMCIT))

Abstract

At the end of the nineteenth and the beginning of the twentieth century, Norway changed from a mainly agrarian to a more urban and industrialized society. These changes offered women new possibilities. In 1884 they were admitted to academic studies, and through a complicated process between 1890 and 1913, they gained suffrage rights. Both these events offered women access to worlds that had until then been reserved for men. Consequently, understandings of both masculinity and femininity were questioned. Troubled understandings of gender identities departed from a long period of what in this chapter is called a secure gender identity, accepting hegemonic masculinity and difference femininity as the norm.

Departing from Raywyn Connell’s theory of relations between hegemonic masculinity and fearful masculinity, this chapter analyzes how different masculinities reacted to different femininities, a classical difference femininity as well as a new equal rights femininity.

At the end of the period, expressions of a new form of secure gender identity emerged when some women and men cooperated in achieving equal rights. However, it was not until the 1970s that this understanding of secure gender identity gained importance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    All quotations are translated from Norwegian by the author.

References

  • Agerholt, Caspari A. (1973/1937). Den norske kvinnebevegelses historie. Oslo: Gyldendal Norsk Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Backer, J. E. (1932). Kvinnelige studenter 1882–1931. En statistisk oversikt. In Kvinnelige studenter 1882–1932. Oslo: Gyldendal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson, M., & Frykman, J. (1987). Om maskulinitet: Mannen som forskningsprojekt. Stockholm, Rapport Jämfo, hefte nr. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjarnar, O. (1995). Veiviser til velferdssamfunnet. Norske Kvinners Sanitetsforening 1946–1996. Oslo: Norske Kvinners Sanitetsforening.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blom, I. (1980). The struggle for women’s suffrage in Norway 1885–1913. Scandinavian Journal of History, 8(1), 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blom, I. (1985). Nødvendig arbeid – skiftende definisjoner og praktiske konsekvenser. Historisk Tidsskrift, 1, 117–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blom, I. (1987). “Hjernen kan ikke utvikle sig samtidigt med ovariene…” Kvinnelige pionerer i den medisinske profesjon omkring 1900. In B. Sawyer & A. Göransson (Eds.), Mannliga strukturer och kvinnliga strategier. En bok til Gunhild Kyle (pp. 238–254). Göteborg: Historiska Institutionen, Göteborgs Universitet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blom, I. (1990a). Changing gender identities in an industrialising society. Gender and History, 2(2), 131–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blom, I. (1990b). “Hun er den Raadende over Husets økonomiske Anliggender”. Changes in women’s work and family responsibilities in Norway since the 1860’s. In P. Hudson & W. R. Lee (Eds.), Women’s work and the family economy in historical perspective (pp. 157–182). Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blom, I. (1994). Det er forskjell på folk – nå som før. Om kjønn og andre former for sosial differensiering. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blom, I. (1996). Nation – class – gender: Scandinavia at the turn of the century. Scandinavian Journal of History 2(Spring), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blom, I. (1997). World history as gender history: The case of the nation state. In S. Tønnesen et al., Between national histories and global history. Konferanserapport til det 23. Det Nordiske Historikermøte, FHS Helsingfors 1997, 71–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blom, I. (1998). Feberens ville rose – Tre omsorgssystemer i tuberkulosearbeidet 1900–1960. Fagbokforlaget: Bergen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blom, I. (2000). Gender and nation states: An international comparative perspective. In I. Blom, K. Hagemann, & C. Hall (Eds.), Gendered nations: The long eighteenth century (pp. 3–26). Oxford: Berg Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blom, I. (2005). 1905 – et gledens eller et sorgens år? In Ø. Sørensen & T. Nielsson (Eds.), 1905 – Nye perspektiver (pp. 101–116). Oslo: H. Aschehoug & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blom, I. (2012). Structures and agency. A Transnational comparison of the struggle for women’s suffrage in the Nordic European Countries during the long 19th century. Scandinavian Journal of History, 37(5), 600–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blom, I. (2013a). “Det bliver ikke til at holde ud”. Den lange vei til kvinnestemmeretten. Historie, 1, 46–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blom, I. (2013b). Hva er en borger? Nasjon, borgerskap og mobilisering i Norden. Historisk Tidskrift, 92(4), 513–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. (1987). Gender and power. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. (1995). Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danielsen, H. (2013). Den kjønnsdelte arbeidsdagen. In H. Danielsen, E. Larsen, & I. W. Owesen (Eds.), Norsk likestillingshistorie 1814–2013 (pp. 221–274). Oslo: Fagbokforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danielsen, H., Larsen, E., & Owesen, I. W. (2013). Norsk likestillingshistorie 1814–2001. Oslo: Fagbokforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidoff, L., & Hall, C. (1987). Family Fortunes. Men and Women of the English Middle Class 1700–1850. London: Hutchinson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florin, C. (2006). Kvinnor får röst: kön, känslor och politisk kultur i kvinnorna srösträttsrörelse. Stockholm: Atlas Akademi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florin, C. (2013). Män som strategi. Rösträttskvinnornas informella vägar till det politiska medborgarskapet. (Norsk). Historisk Tidskrift, 92(4), 541–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folkvord, M. (2013). Frederikke Marie Qvam: rabaldermenneske og strateg. Oslo: Samlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frøhlich, A. (1984). Norges første kvinnelige leger 1893–1920. Unpublished master thesis, University of Bergen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagemann, G. (2010/2005). Fra de stummes leir? 1800–1900. In I. Blom & S. Sogner (Eds.), Med kjønnsperspektiv på norsk historie. Fra vikingtid til 2000-årsskiftet (pp. 157–254). Oslo: Cappelen akademisk forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagemann, G. (2012). Er det noe nytt å si om stemmeretten? Foredrag på fellesmøte den 13. september 2012. In Det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi, Årbok 2012 (pp. 273–290). Oslo: Novus forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halsaa, B., Roseneil, S., & Sümer, S. (Eds.). (2012). Remaking citizenship in multicultural Europe: Womens movements, gender and diversity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernes, H. (1982). Staten – kvinner ingen adgang? Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernes, H. (1987). Welfare state and woman power: Essays in state feminism. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawm, E., & Ranger, T. (Eds.). (1983). The invention of tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, M. (2011). Livet er et pust. Ragna Nielsen – en biografi. Oslo: Aschehoug.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler-Harris, A. (2001). In pursuit of equity: Women, men and the quest for economic citizenship in twentieth century America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimmel, M. S. (Ed.). (1987). Changing men. New directions in research on men and masculinity. London: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Klokkersund, R. (1986). “…hjemmet først og fremst, men det andet ikke forsømmes…” Kirkens kvinnesyn belyst med utgangspunkt i debatten om kvinners adgang til prestembetet i perioden 1891–1912. Unpublished master thesis, University of Bergen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolstad, E. (Ed.). (1963). Stortinget om Stemmerett for Kvinner 17. mai 1814-11. juni 1913. Oslo: A/S Fredr. Arnesen Bok- og Akcidentstrykkeri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, J. (2010). Også andre hensyn: dansk ligestillingshistorie 1849–1915. Århus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, J. (2013). Kvindevalgret, kvindebevægelse og politiske partier. En analyse af danske strategidiskussioner 1901–1915. (Norsk). Historisk Tidskrift, 92(4), 527–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, E. (2013). Stemmerett til alle. In H. Danielsen, E. Larsen, & I. W. Owesen (Eds.), Norsk likestillingshistorie 1814–2013 (pp. 159–218). Oslo: Fagbokforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Feuvre, N., Ervik, R., Krajewska, A., & Metso, M. (2012). Remaking economic citizenship in multicultural Europe: Women’s movement claims and the ‘commodification of elderly care’. In B. Halsaas, S. Roseneil, & S. Sümer (Eds.), Remaking citizenship in multicultural Europe: Women’s movements, gender and diversity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luthersk Kirketidende. (1909) Nr. 16, oktober 1909.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, T. H., & Bottomore, T. (1992). Citizenship and social class. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moksnes, A. (1984). Likestilling eller særstilling? Norsk kvinnesaksforening 1884–1913. Oslo: Gyldendal Norsk Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohman Nielsen, M.-B. (2011). Norvegr. Norges Historie Bind III, 1840–1914. Oslo: H. Aschehoug & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owesen, I. W. (2013). Fra lukkede til offentlige rom 1880–1900. In H. Danielsen, E. Larsen, & I. W. Owesen (Eds.), Norsk likestillingshistorie 1814–2013 (pp. 113–155). Oslo: Fagbokforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, S. O. (2010). What is gender history. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skard, T. (1980). Utvalgt til Stortinget. Oslo: Gyldendal Norsk Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. D. (2001). Nationalism: Theory, ideology, history. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. G. (2008). Industry and industrialization. In B. G. Smith (Ed.), The oxford encyclopedia of women in world history (Vol. 2, pp. 585–590). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svello, B. (1980). “Reformere os selv”. Norsk kvindesagsforenings vurdering av kvinners utdannelsesmuligheter, yrkesaktivitet og hjemmearbeide i perioden 1887–1894. Unpublished master thesis, University of Bergen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuval-Davis, N. (1999). Gender and nation. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuval-Davis, N., & Anthias, F. (Eds.). (1989). Woman-nation-state. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Blom, I. (2016). Troubled and Secure Gender Identities in a Changing Society: Norway at the End of the Long Nineteenth Century. In: Danielsen, H., Jegerstedt, K., Muriaas, R., Ytre-Arne, B. (eds) Gendered Citizenship and the Politics of Representation. Citizenship, Gender and Diversity. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51765-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51765-4_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-51764-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-51765-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics