Advertisement

“The Venus Hottentot Is Unavailable for Comment”: Questioning the Politics of Representation Through Aesthetic Practices

  • Jorunn Gjerden
  • Kari Jegerstedt
  • Željka Švrljuga
Chapter
Part of the Citizenship, Gender and Diversity book series (FEMCIT)

Abstract

The worldwide interest in the historical figure of The Hottentot Venus (aka Sara Baartman) attests to the desire to rework colonial configurations of “black woman” to open more inclusive and egalitarian notions of citizenship and democracy in a postcolonial world. But how can contemporary practices revise the nineteenth century’s objectifying gaze on The Hottentot Venus without simply repeating it? Can attempts to render voice and point of view to her result in anything but new reductive representations? Can aesthetic practices help problematize and disrupt not only hegemonic representations but also the systems of representation as such, in ways that effectively undermine dominant power structures?

Inspired by Spivak’s assertion that “the figure of woman is pervasively instrumental in the shifting of the function of discursive systems”, this chapter investigates three art fictions—the French film Vénus noire (Abdellatif Kechiche), the American play Venus (Suzan Lori-Parks), and the South African novel Davids Story (Zoë Wicomb)—that seek to circumvent the pitfalls of “speaking for” and “speaking about” the other by offering provisional and partial solutions, always in need of subsequent revisions. The texts work to supplement representation through aesthetic practices such as opacity, re-cycling, and subtraction, thus offering alternative visions in which “(black) woman” is not necessarily re-figured in (new) gendered and racialized discourses, but pre-figures the possibility of alternative modes of citizenship.

Keywords

Double Bind Representational Mode Chattel Slavery Title Character Newspaper Clipping 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Baderoon, G. (2011). Baartman and the private: How can we look at a figure that has been looked at too much? In N. Gordon-Chipembere (Ed.), Representation and black womanhood: The legacy of Sarah Baartman (pp. 65–83). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Badiou, A. (2007). Destruction, negation, subtraction. On Pier Paolo Pasolini. Accessed January 30, 2014, from http://www.lacan.com/badpas.htm
  3. Basaran, A. (2010). Representation and the Dominant Gaze. Accessed September 10, 2013, from http://www.jgcinema.com/single.php?sl=dominant-gaze-colonialism-representation
  4. Cuvier, G. (1817). Extrait d’observations faites sur le cadavre d’une femme connue à Paris et à Londres sous le nom de Vénus Hottentote. Mémoires dHistoire natuelle 3. Paris: G Doufour, 259–274.Google Scholar
  5. Driver, D. (2001). Afterword. Wicomb Z Davids Story. New York: The Feminist Press.Google Scholar
  6. Drukman, S., Diamond, L., & Parks, S.-L. (1995). Doo-a-Diddly-Dit-Dit: An interview. The Drama Review, 39(3), 56–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gilman, S. (1985). Black bodies, white bodies: Toward an iconography of female sexuality in late nineteenth-century art, medicine, and literature. Critical Inquiry, 12(1), 204–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Glissant, É. (2000). Poetics of relation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  9. Gould, S. J. (1985). The Flamingo’s smile. Reflections in natural history. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  10. Gquola, P. D. (2010). (Not)representing Sara Baartman. In What is slavery to me? Postcolonial memory and the post-apartheid imagination. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Harrow, K. (2006). The marks left on the surface in Zoë Wicomb’s Davids Story. In F. N. Emenyonu (Ed.), New directions in African literature. Oxford: James Curry Africa World Press.Google Scholar
  12. Kechiche, A. (2010). Vénus noire. Un film dAbdellatif Kechiche. Paris: MK2.Google Scholar
  13. Larson, J. (2012). Understanding Suzan-Lori Parks. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  14. Magubane, Z. (2001). Which bodies matter? Feminism, poststructuralism, race and the curious theoretical Odyssey of the “Hottentot Venus”. Gender and Society, 15(6), 816–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Marais, M. (2005). Bastards and Bodies in Zöe Wicomb’s Davids Story. Journal of Commonwealth Literature, 40(3), 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mbeki, T. (2002). Speech at the funeral of Sarah Bartmann, 9 August 2002. Accessed August 20, 2014, from http://www.dfa.gov.za/docs/speeches/2002/mbek0809.htm
  17. Oddenino, I. (2011). “I Wanna Love Something Wild”: A reading of Suzan-Lori Parks’s Venus. In N. Gordon-Chipembere (Ed.), Representation and black womanhood: The legacy of Sarah Baartman (pp. 121–135). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Parks, S.-L. (1990/1997). Venus. New York: Theatre Communications Group.Google Scholar
  19. Parks, S.-L. (1995/2013a). Elements of style. The American play and other works (pp. 6–18). New York: Theatre Communications Group.Google Scholar
  20. Parks, S.-L. (1995/2013b). Possession. The American play and other works (pp. 3–5). New York: Theatre Communications Group.Google Scholar
  21. Qureshi, S. (2004). Displaying Sara Baartman, the “Hottentot Venus”. History of Science, 42(2), 233–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Samuelson, M. (2007). Remembering the nation, dismembering women? Scottsville: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press.Google Scholar
  23. Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the Subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & R. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Spivak, G. C. (2003). Death of a discipline. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Théaulon, Dartois and Brasier. (1814). La Vénus Hottentote ou Haine aux Françaises. Accessed May 9, 2013, from http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k57721188
  26. Wicomb, Z. (1998). Shame and identity: The case of the coloured in South Africa. In D. Attridge & R. Jolly (Eds.), Writing South Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Wicomb, Z. (2001). David’s Story. New York: Feminist Press.Google Scholar
  28. Widemann, D. (2010). Cinéma. Vénus noire, d’Abdellatif Kechiche. Accessed September 10, 2013, from http://www.humanite.fr/26_10_2010-cin%C3%A9ma-v%C3%A9nus-noire-dabdellatif-kechiche-456487
  29. Young, J. (1997). The re-objectification and re-commodification of Saartjie Baartman in Suzan-Lori Parks’s Venus. African American Review, 31(4), 699–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jorunn Gjerden
    • 1
  • Kari Jegerstedt
    • 2
  • Željka Švrljuga
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Foreign LanguagesUniversity of BergenBergenNorway
  2. 2.Centre for Women and Gender ResearchUniversity of BergenBergenNorway
  3. 3.Department of Foreign LanguagesUniversity of BergenBergenNorway

Personalised recommendations