Abstract
In the aftermath and mop-up following a successful dissertation defense, an unintended and unexpected data source remained unexplored and unanalyzed: 32 audio-recorded discussions and work sessions documenting the processes, approaches, and decisions made by a dissertation director and his doctoral candidate. What might those conversations reveal about the dissertation relationship? Taking a page from Raymond Carver’s short story, “What We Talk about When We Talk about Love,” we wondered what we might have been talking about when we were talking about dissertation writing. Inspired and shaped by Norris, Sawyer, and Lund’s (2012. Duoethnography: Dialogic methods for social, health, and educational research. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.) duoethnographic methods, this study provides opportunity for us to not just look back on the journey, but pushes us into the messiness of “recalling and reconceptualizing” (p. 10). As we each “become the foil for the Other, challenging the Other to reflect on their own life in a deeper, more relational, and authentic manner” (Norris et al., 2012, p. 10) we also interrogate and trouble our own simplistic categories of analysis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Childers, S. M., Rhee, J., & Daza, S. (Eds.). (2013). Feminist methodologies: The dirty theory and messy practice of educational research beyond gender [Special Issue]. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education.
Garman, N., & Piantanida, M. (2006). The authority to imagine: The struggle toward representation in dissertation writing. New York: Peter Lang.
Hatt, B., Quach, L., Brown, S., & Anderson, A. (2009). Coffee talk: Negotiating/disrupting the hidden curriculum of graduate school. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 25(1), 60–67.
Helfenbein, R. (2010). Thinking through scale: Critical geography and curriculum spaces. In E. Malewski (Ed.), Curriculum studies handbook: The next moment (pp. 304–317). New York: Routledge.
hooks, b. (2000). All about love: new visions. New York, NY: Perennial of HarperCollins.
Huebner, D. (1999). The lure of the transcendent: Collected essays by Dwayne E. Huebner. (V. Hillis, & W. F. Pinar, Eds.) Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.
Lather, P. (2000). Drawing the line at angels: Working the ruins of feminist ethnography. In E. S. Pierre (Ed.), Working the ruins: Feminist poststructural theory and methods in education (pp. 284–311). London: Routledge.
Lather, P. (2012). Engaging science policy: From the side of the messy. New York: Peter Lang.
Lather, P. (2013). Methodology-21: What do we do in the afterward. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 634–645.
Merton, T. (1979). Love and need. In N. Burton Stone & B. P. Hart (Eds.), Love and living. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
Michaels, A. (1996). Fugitive pieces. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart.
Miller, J. L. (2005). Sounds of silence breaking: Women, autobiography, curriculum. New York: Peter Lang.
Norris, J., Sawyer, R. D., & Lund, D. E. (2012). Duoethnography: Dialogic methods for social, health, and educational research. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
Pinar, W. (2006). The synoptic text today and other essays: Curriculum development after the reconceptualization. New York: Peter Lang.
Pinar, W. F. (2007). Intellectual advancement through disciplinarity: Verticality and horizontality in curriculum studies. New York: Sense Publishers.
Pollock, D. (1999). Telling bodies: Performing birth. New York: Columbia University Press.
Quinn, M. (2010). “No room in the inn”? The question of hospitality in the post(partum)—Labors of curriculum studies. In E. Malewski (Ed.), Curriculum studies handbook: The next moment (pp. 101–117). New York: Routledge.
Reynolds, W. M. & Webber, J. (Eds.). (2004). Expanding curriculum theory: Dis/positions and lines of flight. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum,
Roy, K. (2003). Teachers in nomadic spaces: Deleuze and curriculum. New York: Peter Lang.
Sumara, D. (2002). Why reading literature in school still matters: Imagination, interpretation, insight. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Welwood, J. (1996). Love and awakening: Discovering the sacred path of intimate relationship. New York: HarperCollins.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Helfenbein, R.J., Adams, S.R. (2016). What We Talk About When We Talk About Love: A Duoethnographic Exploration of the Dissertation Relationship. In: Sawyer, R., Norris, J. (eds) Interdisciplinary Reflective Practice through Duoethnography. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51739-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51739-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-51738-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-51739-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)