Skip to main content

The Extent of Corruption

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 903 Accesses

Abstract

It was discussed in Chap. 2 that no international consensus existed concerning a definition of corruption. This makes the subject difficult to study empirically. Furthermore, there are also often no witnesses who are unaware they are a victim of corruption. However, understanding the level of corruption is important; if corruption can be measured, regardless of how approximate the data might be, it can be learned which factors are potentially involved in any reduction of its incidence (Collier 2000; Heywood 2015). Measurement is therefore critical, providing some benchmark of progress, understanding its extent, and identifying what effective factors reduced its rate of incidence, if any. This chapter therefore examines the various efforts that have been made, both historically and contemporarily (Hough 2015), to gauge the prevalence of corruption, its impact on people and the effectiveness of anti-corruption initiatives and reforms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    There are four pillars of economic freedom. These are: Rule of law (property rights, freedom from corruption); Government size (fiscal freedom, government spending); Regulatory efficiency (business ferrdom, labour freedom, monetary freedom); and Market openness (trade freedom, investment freedom, financial freedom), and assess a country’s economic progress.

  2. 2.

    ‘In the field means primary research (i.e., interviewing someone)’.

References

  • Anderson, S., & Heywood, P. M. (2009). The politics of perception; use and abuse of Transparency International’s approach to measuring corruption. Political Studies, 57(4), 746–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arndt, C., & Oman, C. (2006). Uses and abuses of governance indicators. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atanassova, A., Bertrand, M., Mullainathan, S., & Niehaus, P. (2009). Targeting with agents: Theory and evidence for India’s below poverty line cards. Mimeo: UC San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, D. H. (1966). The effects of corruption in a developing nation. Western Political Quarterly, 190(4), 719–732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, A., Deaton, A., & Duo, E. (2004). Health care delivery in rural Rajasthan. Economic and Political Weekly, 39(9), 944–949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, A., Duflo, E., & Glennerster, R. (2007). Putting a band-aid on a corpse: Incentives for nurses in the Indian public health care system. Journal of the European Economic Association, 6(2–3), 487–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan, P. (1997). Corruption and development: A review of issues. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(3), 1320–1346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, P. J., & Maher, M. W. (1986). A comparison of bribery and bidding in thin markets. Economics Letters, 20(1), 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand, M., Djankov, S., Hanna, R., & Mullainathan, S. (2007). Obtaining a driver’s license in India: An experimental approach to studying corruption. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(4), 1639–1676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradburn, N. M. (1983). Response effects. In R. Peter, H. Rossi, J. D. Wright, & A. B. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of survey research. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, G., Walsh, D., Lewis, C., & Kim, H. (2013). The prevention of corruption: Investigation, enforcement and governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brunetti, A., Kisunko, G., Weder, B. (1997). Institutional obstacles to doing business. (Policy Research Working Paper 1759). Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Button, M., Gee, J. & Brooks, G. (2011) Measuring the cost of fraud: an opportunity for the new competitive advantage. Journal of Financial Crime, 19 (1), 65–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Button, M., Lewis, C., Shepard, D., & Brooks, G. (2015). Fraud in overseas aid and the challenge of measurement. Journal of Financial Crime, 22(2), 184–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhury, N., Hammer, J., Kremer, M., Muralidharan, K., & Rogers, F. (2006). Missing in action: Teacher and health worker absence in developing countries. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 91–116.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, C. & Moynihan, J. (1996). Understanding crime data: haunted by the dark figure. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, P. (2000). How to reduce corruption. African Development Review, 12(2), 191–205.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • De Maria, W. (2008). Measurements and markets: Deconstructing the corruption perception index. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21(7), 777–797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Soto, H. (1989). The other path. The invisible revolution in the Third World. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donchev, D. & Ujhelyi, G., 2007. Do Corruption Indices Measure Corruption? Economics & Politics, 26 (2), 309–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreher, A., & Siemers, L. H. R. (2009). The nexus between corruption and capital account restrictions. Public Choice, 140(1–2), 245–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duflo, E., Hanna, R., & Ryan, S. (2008). Monitoring works: Getting teachers to come to school (CEPR Discussion Papers 6682).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, I., & Lui, F. (1999). Bureaucratic corruption and endogenous economic growth. Journal of Political Economy, 107(6), 270–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraz, C., & Finan, F. (2008). Exposing corrupt politicians: The effects of Brazil’s publicly released audits on electoral outcomes. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(2), 703–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, F. (2006). Measuring the immeasurable: Boundaries and Functions of (Macro) corruption indices. In C. Sampford, A. Shacklock, C. Connors, & F. Galtung (Eds.), Measuring corruption. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henisz, W. J. (2000). The institutional environment for economic growth. Economics and Politics, 12(1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, P. M. (2015). Routledge handbook of political corruption. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough, D. (2015). Corruption, anti-corruption and governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, J. (2007). Bribery in Health Care in Peru and Uganda (NBER Working Papers 13034). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. P. (1968). Political order in changing societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Integrity, G.F. (2011). Illicit financial flows from developing countries: 2000–2009. Update with a Focus on Asia, Global Financial Integrity Executive Report, Washington: Global Integrity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, N. M., Li, Q., & Rahman, A. (2010). Understanding corruption and firm responses in cross-national firm-level surveys. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(9), 1481–1504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, M. (2002). Measuring the new corruption rankings: Implications for analysis and reform. In A. J. Heidenheimer & M. Johnson (Eds.), Political corruption—Concepts & contexts. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, M. (2005). Syndromes of corruption: Wealth, power and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (1999). Governance matters (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2196). Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2006). Measuring corruption: Myths and realities. Development Outreach, 8(2), 124–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., &Mastruzzi, M. (2007). Growth and Governance: A Reply. The Journal of Politics, 69(2), 555–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2009). Governance matters VIII: Aggregate and individual governance indicators 19962008 (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4978). Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiselev, E. (2012). Bribe-taking and bureaucratic competition: A search cost model of corruption. Waltham, MA: Brandeis University International Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knack, S. (2002). Social capital, growth and poverty: A survey of cross-country evidence. In C. Grootaert & T. van Bastelaer (Eds.), The role of social capital in development: An empirical assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knack, S. (2006). Measuring corruption in Eastern Europe and Central Asia: A critique of the cross-country indicators (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3968). Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koziol, M., & Tolmie, C. (2010). Using public expenditure tracking surveys to monitor projects and small-scale programs—A guide. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kurer, O. (1993). Clientelism, corruption and the allocation of resources. Public Choice, 77(2), 259–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz, M., & Schrank, A. (2007). Growth and governance: Models, measures, and mechanisms. Journal of Politics, 69(2), 538–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambsdorff, J. G. (2005). The methodology of the 2005 corruption perceptions index. Germany, Passau: Transparency International and University of Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambsdorff, J. G. (2006). Causes and consequences of corruption: What do we know from a cross-section of countries? In S. Rose-Ackerman (Ed.), International handbook on the economics of corruption. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leff, N. H. (1964). Economic development through bureaucratic corruption. American Behavioral Scientist, 8(3), 8–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leff, N. H. (1989) Economic Development through Bureaucratic Corruption, in A.J. Heidenheimer, M. Johnston and V.T. LeVine (eds.) Political Corruption: A Handbook, New Brunswick NJ: Transaction Books, pp: 389–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, M. & Burrows, J. (2008). Measuring the Impact of Fraud in the UK A Conceptual and Empirical Journey. British Journal of Criminology, 48(3), 293-318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leys, C. (1965). What is the problem about corruption? Journal of Modern African Studies, 3(2), 215–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lien, D. H. D. (1986). A note on competitive bribery games. Economics Letters, 22, 337–341.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lui, F. T. (1985). An equilibrium queuing model of bribery. Journal of Political Economy, 93(4), 760–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauro, P. (1998). Corruption and the composition of government expenditure. Journal of Public Economics, 69(2), 263–279.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Mauro, P. (2004). The persistence of corruption and slow economic growth. IMF staff papers. Washington, DC: IMF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurseth, P. B. (2008). Governance indicators: A guided tour (NUPI Working Paper 754).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meon, P.-G., & Weill, L. (2010). Is corruption an efficient grease? World Development, 38(3), 244–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myrdal, G. (1968) Corruption: its causes and effects. In Asian drama: An inquiry into the poverty of nations. Vol. II. New York: Pantheon. Reprinted in Political corruption: A handbook. Edited by a Heidenheimer et al. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 1989: 953–961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olken, B. (2007). Monitoring corruption: Evidence from a field experiment in Indonesia. Journal of Political Economy, 115(2), 200–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olken, B. and Barron, P. (2007). The Simple Economics of Extortion* Evidence from Trucking in Aceh, Journal of Political Economy, 117(3), 417–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1993). Dictatorship, democracy, and development. American Political Science Review, 87(3), 567–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinekka, R. & Smith, N. (2004). Public expenditure tracking surveys in education. International Institute for Educational Planning. Paris. UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinikka, R. and Svensson, J. (2004). Local Capture: Evidence from a Central Government Transfer Program in Uganda. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(2), 679–705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinikka, R., & Svensson, J. (2005). Fighting corruption to improve schooling: Evidence from a newspaper campaign in Uganda. Journal of the European Economic Association, 3(2–3), 259–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinekka, R. & Svensson, J. (2006). Using micro surveys to measure and explain corruption. World Development, 34 (2), 359–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohwer, A. (2009). Measuring corruption: A comparison between the Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index and the World Bank’s Worldwide Governance Indicators. Ifo Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich. CESifo DICE Report, 7, 42–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose-Ackerman, R. (1997). The political economy of corruption. In K. A. Elliott (Ed.), Corruption and the global economy. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaxson, N. (2007). Oil, corruption and the resource curse. International Affairs, 83(6), 1123–1140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, J. (2003). Why conditional aid does not work and what can be done about it? Journal of Development Economics, 70, 381–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, J. (2005). Eight questions about corruption. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 19–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, T., & Shah, A. (2005). Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index: Whose Perceptions are they anywhere?, cited in A. Rohwer. (2009). Measuring corruption: A comparison between the Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index and the World Bank’s Worldwide Governance Indicators. CESifo DICE Report. Ifo Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urra, F., J. (2007) Assessing Corruption An analytical review of Corruption measurement and its problems: Perception, Error and Utility. Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service: Georgetown University.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN. (2008). United Nations Development Programme. Washington, DC: UN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber Abramo, C. (2008). How much do perceptions of corruption really tell us? Economics-The Open-Access. Open-Assessment E-Journal, 2, 1–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthy, B. & McClean, T. (2015). Freedom of Information and Corruption in P. Heywood et al (2015) Routledge Handbook of Political Corruption, pp.347–359. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brooks, G. (2016). The Extent of Corruption. In: Criminology of Corruption. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51724-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51724-1_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-51723-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-51724-1

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics