Skip to main content

Outraging Speech: On the Politics of Performative Contradictions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Subjectivation in Political Theory and Contemporary Practices

Abstract

Posselt offers an account that understands performative contradiction no longer as a form of self-refuting speech, but rather as a ‘contradiction’ that is inherent to any political act that involves the demand and exercise of fundamental rights. While in the context of universal pragmatics—as developed by Apel and Habermas—the allegation of performative self-contradiction is used to delineate the field of rational speech, Posselt argues that what is at stake in the debate on performative contradictions are not only the foundations of rational discourse, but also the question of what it means to be a legitimate speaking subject. Referring to Butler and Derrida, the chapter stresses that performative contradictions play a vital role in subject formation and political agency as well as in any radical politics of change.

This article has been supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF): Research Project P 26579-G22 ‘Language and Violence. The Ethico-Political Turn to Language After the Linguistic Turn’. My special thanks go to Sergej Seitz for critical remarks and suggestions and to Julia Schleinkofer for the translation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It is worthwhile noting that the German edition of Austin’s How to Do Things with Words translates ‘outrageous’ inter alia by ‘unerhört’, which in German signifies ‘not answered’ as well as ‘unheard-of, outrageous’.

Bibliography

  • Apel, K.-O. (1987). Fallibilismus, Konsenstheorie der Wahrheit und Letztbegründung. In Forum für Philosophie Bad Homburg (Ed.), Philosophie und Begründung. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apel, K.-O. (1997). Dialog mit Karl-Otto Apel in Sic et Non, [Online]. Available: http://archiv.sicetnon.org/artikel/aktuelles/apel.htm [7 November 2014].

  • Aristotle. (1989). Aristotle in 23 volumes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. L. (1970). Philosophical papers. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. L. (1975). How to do things with words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1995a). Contingent foundations: Feminism and the question of ‘Postmodernism’. In S. Benhabib et al. (Eds.), Feminist contentions: A philosophical exchange. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1995b). For a careful reading. In S. Benhabib et al. (Eds.), Feminist contentions: A philosophical exchange. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1997). Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J., & Spivak, G. C. (2007). Who sings the nation-state? Language, politics, belonging. Oxford: Seagull.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1988). Limited Inc. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1989). Memoires for Paul de Man. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1998). Monolingualism of the other or the prosthesis of origin. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (2002). Declarations of independence. In J. Derrida, Negotiations: Interventions and interviews 1971–2001. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1979). Communication and the evolution of society. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jay, M. (1989). The debate over performative contradiction: Habermas vs. the post-structuralists. In A. Honneth et al. (Eds.), Zwischenbetrachtungen. Im Prozeß der Aufklärung. Jürgen Habermas zum 60. Geburtstag. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettner, M. (1993). Ansatz zu einer Taxonomie performativer Selbstwidersprüche. in A. Dorschel et al. (eds.) Transzendentalpragmatik, Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J.-F. (1988). The differend: Phrases in dispute. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, J. (1999). Disagreement: Politics and philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Posselt, G. (2016). Outraging Speech: On the Politics of Performative Contradictions. In: Oberprantacher, A., Siclodi, A. (eds) Subjectivation in Political Theory and Contemporary Practices. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51659-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics