Skip to main content
  • 756 Accesses

Abstract

Rosa Luxemburg and Lenin represent distinct approaches to revolutionary transformation, and these differences have become of increasing importance in light of the failure of numerous revolutions since 1917 to avoid succumbing to bureaucratic and authoritarian dictatorships. Although many presume that the divide between the two centers on matters of organization, a careful study of their work shows that this was less decisive than is often claimed, since they also shared many common approaches to the issue. The question that truly demarcates Luxemburg’s legacy from Lenin’s concerns what happens after the revolutionary seizure of power. This is most powerfully seen in her writings on revolutionary democracy and the critique of Lenin in ‘The Russian Revolution.’

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Anderson, Kevin. 1995. Lenin, Hegel, and Western Marxism: A Critical Study. Champaign-Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blobaum, Robert E. 1995. Rewolucja: Russian Poland, 1904–1907. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, Richard and Gaido, Daniel (eds.). 2011. Witnesses to Permanent Revolution: The Documentary Record. Chicago: Haymarket Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunayevskaya, Raya. 1983. Rosa Luxemburg, Women’s Liberation, and Marx’s Philosophy of Revolution. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunayevskaya, Raya, 2003. Philosophy and Revolution, from Hegel to Marx and from Marx to Mao (New Lanham, MD: Lexington Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G.W.F. 1929. Science of Logic, trans, Johnston and Struthers (New York: The Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudis, Peter. 1998. “Dialectics, ‘the Party,’ and the Problem of the New Society,” Historical Materialism, No. 3, pp. 95–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudis, Peter. 2015. Frantz Fanon: Philosopher of the Barricades. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenin, V.I. 1905. “Reply to Luxemburg on One Step Forward, Two Steps Back.” In Collected Works, Vol. 7. London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenin, V.I, 1906. “Our Tasks and the Soviet of Workers’ Deputies.” In Lenin Collected Works, Vol. 10. Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luxemburg, Rosa. 1895. “Sozialdemokratische Bewegung in den litauischen Gouvernements Rußlands.” In Gesammelte Werke, Band 6. Berlin: Dietz Verlag. 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luxemburg, Rosa. 1904. “Organizational Principles of Russian Social Democracy.” In The Rosa Luxemburg Reader, eds. Peter Hudis‚ and Kevin B. Anderson. New York: Monthly Review Books, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luxemburg, Rosa. January 1905. “Die Revolution in Rußland.” In Rosa Luxemburg, Gesammelte Werke, Band 1.2. Berlin: Dietz Verlag, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luxemburg, Rosa. February 4, 1905. “Nach dem ersten Akt.” In Rosa Luxemburg, Gesammelte Werke, Band 1.2, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luxemburg, Rosa. February 9–20, 1905. “Die Revolution in Rußland.” In Gesammelte Werke, Band 1.2, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luxemburg, Rosa. March 1905. “Eine Probe aufs Exempel.” In Rosa Luxemburg, Gesammelte Werke, Band 1.2, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luxemburg, Rosa. April 1905.“Obrachunek Polityczny.” In Czerwony Sztandar, No. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luxemburg, Rosa. November 29, 1905. “Die Revolution in Rußland.” In Gesammelte Werke, Band 6, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luxemburg, Rosa. November 30, 1905. “Die Revolution in Rußland.” In Gesammelte Werke, Band 6, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luxemburg, Rosa. December 1, 1905. “Die Revolution in Rußland.” In Gesammelte Werke, Band 6, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luxemburg, Rosa. December 20, 1905. “Die russische Revolution.” In Rosa Luxemburg, Gesammelte Werke, Band 2. Berlin: Dietz Verlag, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luxemburg, Rosa. September 24, 1907. “Letter to Henrietta Roland-Holst.” In Gesammelte Briefe, Band 2, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luxemburg. Rosa. August 19, 1909. “Letter to Leo Jogiches.” In Gesammelte Briefe, Band 3. Berlin: Dietz Verlag, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luxemburg, Rosa. 1911. “Credo: On the State of Russian Social Democracy.” In The Rosa Luxemburg Reader, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luxemburg, Rosa. 1911. The Accumulation of Capital. In The Complete Works of Rosa Luxemburg, Vol. 2: Economic Writings 2, ed. Peter Hudis and Paul Le Blanc. London and New York: Verso Books, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luxemburg, Rosa. 1915. The Junius Pamphlet: The Crisis in German Social Democracy. In The Rosa Luxemburg Reader, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luxemburg, Rosa. 1918. “What Does the Spartacus League Want?” In The Rosa Luxemburg Reader, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luxemburg, Rosa. 1918. “Our Program and the Political Situation.” In The Rosa Luxemburg Reader, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luxemburg, Rosa. November 18, 1918. “The Beginning.” In The Rosa Luxemburg Reader, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luxemburg, Rosa. 1918. The Russian Revolution. In The Rosa Luxemburg Reader, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luxemburg, Rosa. 1925. Introduction to Political Economy. In The Complete Works of Rosa Luxemburg, Vol. 1: Economic Writings 1, ed. Peter Hudis. London and New York: Verso Books, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luxemburg, Rosa. 1976. The National Question: Selected Writings by Rosa Luxemburg, ed. Horace Davis. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luxemburg, Rosa. 2012. Nationalitätenfrage und Autonomie, ed. Holger Politt. Berlin: Dietz Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzec, Wikto. 2013. “Reading Polish Peripheral Marxism Politically,” Thesis Eleven, Vol. 6, No. 117, pp. 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich. 1846. The German Ideology. In Marx-Engels Collected Works, Vol. 5. New York: International Publishers, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl. April 9, 1863. “Letter to Engels.” In Marx-Engels Collected Works, Vol. 41. New York: International Publishers, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl. 1871. The Civil War in France. In Marx-Engels Collected Works, Vol. 23. New York: International Publishers, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl. 1871. “Drafts of the Civil War in France.” In Marx and Engels Collected Works, Vol. 22, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nettl, J.P. 1966. Rosa Luxemburg. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascal, Pierre. 1969. Civilisation paysanne en Russie (Lausanne: L’Age d’homme, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, John. 2015. “Luxemburg, Müller and the Berlin Workers’ and Soldiers’ Councils.” In International Socialism, No. 147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, Soloman, M. 1967. The Workers’ Movement and the Formation of Bolshevism and Menshevism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trotsky, Leon. 1905. 1972. New York and London: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Hudis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hudis, P. (2018). Luxemburg and Lenin. In: Rockmore, T., Levine, N. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Leninist Political Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51650-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics