Skip to main content

From Representation Gap to Resolution Gap: Exploring the Role of Employee Voice in Conflict Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reframing Resolution

Abstract

This chapter explores the role of employee voice in the resolution of the management of conflict and the resolution of individual employment disputes. It is taken from a broader study of conflict management in the UK, based on five organizational case studies funded by the Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service (Acas). Since the publication of the Gibbons Review into the UK’s system of employment dispute resolution in 2007, substantial policy attention has been paid to the ways in which organizations deal with individual workplace conflict. However, the role of employee voice in supporting (or challenging) organizations in the management of conflict has been a notable omission from this debate. Therefore this chapter seeks to begin to fill this gap and offer a greater understanding of the function that employee voice plays.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Employment tribunals are public bodies that have the authority to adjudicate on claims made under UK legislation in relation to unfair dismissal, discrimination and other employment related jurisdictions.

References

  • Alfes, K., Shantz, A., Truss, C., & Soane, E. (2013). The link between perceived human resource management practices, engagement and employee behaviour: A moderated mediation model. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(2), 330–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antcliff, V., & Saundry, R. (2009). Accompaniment, workplace representation and disciplinary outcomes in British workplaces – Just a formality? British Journal of Industrial Relations, 47(1), 100–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avery, D., McKay, P., Wilson, D., Volpone, S., & Killham, E. (2011). Does voice go flat? How tenure diminishes the impact of voice. Human Resource Management, 50(1), 147–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batt, R., Colvin, A., & Keefe, J. (2002). Employee voice, human resource practices, and quit rates: Evidence from the telecommunications industry. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 55(4), 573–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BIS (2011). Resolving workplace disputes: A consultation. London: BIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boroff, K., & Lewin, D. (1997). Loyalty, voice, and intent to exit a union firm: A conceptual and empirical analysis. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 51, 50–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • British Chambers of Commerce (2010). Employment regulation: Up to the job? London: British Chambers of Commerce.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, A., Gomez, R., & Willman, P. (2006). Voice at work: What do employers want? A symposium summary. Socio-Economic Review, 4, 279–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, A., Willman, P., Gomez, R., & Kretschmer, T. (2013). The comparative advantage of non-union voice in Britain, 1980–2004. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 52(s1), 194–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campolieti, M., Gomez, R., & Gunderson, M. (2013). Does non-union employee representation act as a complement or substitute to union voice? Evidence from Canada and the United States. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 52(s1), 378–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cathcart, A. (2013). Directing democracy: Competing interests and contested terrain in the John Lewis Partnership. Journal of Industrial Relations, 55(4), 601–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CBI (2011). Settling the matterBuilding a more effective and efficient tribunal system, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlwood, A., & Forth, J. (2009). Employee representation. In W. Brown, A. Bryson, J. Forth, & K. Whitfield (Eds.), The evolution of the modern workplace (pp. 74–96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlwood, A., & Pollert, A. (2014). Informal employment dispute resolution among low-wage non-union workers: Does managerially initiated workplace voice enhance equity and efficiency? British Journal of Industrial Relations, 52(2), 359–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charlwood, A., & Terry, M. (2007). 21st-century models of employee representation: Structures, processes and outcomes. Industrial Relations Journal, 38(4), 320–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CIPD (2011). Conflict management – Survey report. London: CIPD.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIPD (2015). Getting under the skin of workplace conflict – A survey of employee experiences of interpersonal conflict at work. London: CIPD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, N. (2013). The future of trade unionism: What does WERS tell us? http://www.ipa-involve.com/news/the-future-of-trade-unionism-what-does-wers-tell us/?utm_source=Adestra&utm_medium=email&utm_term=. Accessed 1 November 2014.

  • Colvin, A. (2013). Participation versus procedures in non-union dispute resolution. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 52(s1), 259–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaghey, J., Cullinane, N., Dundon, T., & Wilkinson, A. (2011). Reconceptualising employee silence: Problems and prognosis. Work, Employment and Society, 25(1), 51–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dundon, T., & Rollinson, D. (2004). Employment relations in non-union firms. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Farndale, E., Van Ruiten, J., Kelliher, C., & Hope-Hailey, V. (2011). The influence of perceived employee voice on organizational commitment: An exchange perspective. Human Resource Management, 50(1), 113–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, M. (2007). A review of employment dispute resolution in Great Britain. London: DTI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollan, P. (2007). Employee representation in non-union firms. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPA and Tomorrow’s Company. (2012). Releasing voice for sustainable business success. http://www.ipa-involve.com/resources/publications/releasing-voice-for-sustainable-business-success/. Accessed 20 November 2014.

  • Jones, C., & Saundry, R. (2012). The practice of discipline: Evaluating the roles and relationship between managers and HR professionals. Human Resource Management Journal, 22(3), 252–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kersley, B., Alpin, C., Forth, J., Bryson, A., Bewley, H., Dix, G., et al. (2006). Inside the workplace: Findings from the 2004 workplace employment relations survey. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luchak, A. (2003). What kind of voice do loyal employees use? British Journal of Industrial Relations, 41(1), 115–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucy, D., & Broughton, A. (2011). Understanding the behaviour and decision making of employees in conflicts and disputes at work, Employment Relations Research Series no. 119, BIS, Institute for Employment Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, D., & Clarke, N. (2009). Engaging for success: Enhancing performance through employee engagement. London: Department of Business, Innovation and Skills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, P., Edwards, P., Edwards, T., Ferner, A., & Tregaskis, O. (2010). Employee representation and consultative voice in multinational companies operating in Britain. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 48(1), 151–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, D. (2011). Individual voice in employment relationships: A comparison under different forms of workplace representation, CEP Discussion Paper, No 1070.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podro, S., Suff, R., & Purcell, J. (2007). Employee representatives: Challenges and changes in the workplace. In Acas policy discussion papers. London: Acas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollert, A., & Charlwood, A. (2008). Who experiences problems at work, what problems do they experience, what do they do about them and what happens as a result?. Working Paper 11The Unorganised Worker: Problems at Work, Routes to Support and Views on Representation, Centre for Employment Studies Research (Bristol Business School).

    Google Scholar 

  • Purcell, J. (2012). The limits and possibilities of employee engagement. Warwick papers in industrial relations, Number 96. University of Warwick: Industrial Relations Research Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyman, A., Holland, P., Teicher, J., & Cooper, B. K. (2010). Industrial relations climate, employee voice and managerial attitudes to unions: An Australian study. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 48(2), 460–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rees, C., Alfes, K., & Gatenby, M. (2013). Employee voice and engagement: Connections and consequences. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(14), 2780–2798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rollinson, D., & Dundon, T. (2007). Understanding employment relations. London: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, A. (2008). Better dispute resolution in Part 1 of the employment act 2008? Industrial Law Journal, 38, 30–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saundry, R., Latreille, P., Dickens, L., Irvine, C., Teague, P., Urwin, P., & Wibberley, G. (2014). Reframing resolution – Managing conflict and resolving individual employment disputes in the contemporary workplace, Acas Policy Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timur, T., Taras, D., & Ponak, A. (2012). ‘Shopping for voice’: Do pre-existing non-union representation plans matter when employees unionize? British Journal of Industrial Relations, 50(2), 214–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, K. (2013). To what extent do line managers play a role in modern industrial relations? Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 51, 421–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • TUC (2014). At what price justice? The impact of employment tribunal fees. London: TUC.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Wanrooy, B., Bewley, H., Bryson, A., Forth, J., Freeth, S., Stokes, L., et al. (2013). Employment relations in the shadow of recession – Findings from the 2011 workplace employment relations study. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, J. A. (1994). Participation’s effects on performance and satisfaction: A reconsideration of research evidence. Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 312–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakeling, A. (2014). Does social media strengthen or dilute employee voice? In Employment relations comment. London: Acas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, A., & Fay, C. (2011). New times for employee voice? Human Resource Management, 50, 65–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Gemma Wibberley or Richard Saundry .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wibberley, G., Saundry, R. (2016). From Representation Gap to Resolution Gap: Exploring the Role of Employee Voice in Conflict Management. In: Saundry, R., Latreille, P., Ashman, I. (eds) Reframing Resolution. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51560-5_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics