Skip to main content

HRM, Organizational Citizenship Behaviour and Conflict Management: The Case of Non-union MNC Subsidiaries in Ireland

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reframing Resolution
  • 1950 Accesses

Abstract

Over the years, an evergreen in the literature on the management of the employment relationship is the observation that organizations will pay a high price if workplace conflict is not addressed quickly and effectively. Days lost to some form of industrial action, sickness and absenteeism rates can be high, and management–employee relations can become strained if not embittered. Just what constitutes an effective approach to managing workplace conflict has always been the subject of debate. But there has been a fair amount of agreement that it involves HR managers establishing a range of formal procedures to address disputes and grievances (Turnbull 2008). At the moment, a popular theme in the relevant literature is that many organizations are seeking to upgrade these traditional formal procedures by diffusing new ADR practices and processes (Lewin 2008). The argument is that workplace conflict has become more small-scale and individual in character, which needs to be addressed by new conflict management strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, V., Rayner, C., & Schyns, B. (2009). Coaching at the sharp end: The role of line managers in coaching at work. London: CIPD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendersky, C. (2003). Organizational dispute resolution systems: A complementarities model. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 643–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, D., & Ostroff, C. (2004). Understanding the HRM-firm performance linkages: The role of the strength of the HRM system. Academy of Management Review, 29(2), 203–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, R. (2003). The changing roles of personnel: Old ambiguities, new uncertainties. Journal of Management Studies, 40(4), 983–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colvin, A. (2003). Institutional pressures, human resource management and the rise of non-union dispute resolution procedures. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 56(3), 375–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobbin, F., & Kelly, E. (2007). How to stop harassment: The professional construction of legal compliance in organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 112(7), 1203–1243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dundon, T., & Rollinson, D. (2004). Employment relations in non-union firms. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Festing, M., & Eidems, J. (2011). A process perspective on transnational HRM systems – A dynamic capability-based analysis. Human Resource Management Review, 21(1), 162–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, A. (1966). Industrial sociology and industrial relations. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochan, T. A. (2007). Social legitimacy of the HRM profession: A US perspective. In P. Boxall, J. Purcell, & P. Wright (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of human resource management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, D. (1987). Dispute resolution in the non-union firm. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 31(3), 465–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, D. (2008). Workplace ADR: What’s new and what matters? In S. E. Befort, & P. Halter (Eds.), Workplace justice for a changing environment, Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting, National Academy of Arbitrators. Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky, D., & Seeber, R. (2003). The social contract and dispute management: The transformation of the social contract in the US workplace and the emergence of new strategies of dispute management. International Employment Relations Review, 9(2), 87–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky, D. B., & Avgar, A. C. (2008). Toward a strategic theory of workplace conflict management. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 24(1), 143–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell, A., Lavelle, J., Collings, D. , & Gunningle, P. (2007) Management research on multinational companies: A methodological critique and blueprint for the future. Paper to the 10th Annual Conference of the Irish Academy of Management, Queen's University Belfast.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod Review (2009). Engaging for success. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, M. (1997). Dispute resolution in the non-union environment: An evolution toward integrated systems for conflict management? In S. Gleason (Ed.), Frontiers in dispute resolution in labor relations and human resources. Michigan: Michigan State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, M., & Simon, M. (2001). Effectiveness of organizational ombudsmen. In Handbook of the Ombudsman Association. Hillsborough: Ombudsman Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcomb, A. (1965). Social structure and organization. In J. March (Ed.), Handbook of industrial organization. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, K. (1999). Employment arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act. In A. E. Eaton, & J. H. Keefe (Eds.), Employment dispute resolution and worker rights in the changing workplace. Industrial Relations Research Association: Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teague, P., & Thomas, D. (2008). Employment standard-setting and dispute resolution. Dublin: Oak Tree Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull, P. (2008). Industrial conflict. In N. Bacon, P. Blyton, J. Fiorito, & E. Heery (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and employment relations. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, D. (1997). Human resource champions: The next agenda for delivering value and delivering results. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, D., Allen, J., Brockbank, W., Younger, J., & Nyman, M. (2009). HR transformation: Building human resources from the outside in. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall, T., & Wood, S. (2005). The romance of HRM and business performance and the case for Big Science. Human Relations, 58(1), 29–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P., & McMahan, G. (2011). Exploring human capital: Putting human back into strategic human resource management. Human Resource Management Journal, 21(2), 93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Paul Teague or Liam Doherty .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Teague, P., Doherty, L. (2016). HRM, Organizational Citizenship Behaviour and Conflict Management: The Case of Non-union MNC Subsidiaries in Ireland. In: Saundry, R., Latreille, P., Ashman, I. (eds) Reframing Resolution. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51560-5_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics