Skip to main content

Transforming the Culture of Conflict Management: Lessons from In-House Mediation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

The promotion of mediation and other alternative forms of employment dispute resolution have largely been driven by a business case revolving around efficiency benefits compared with conventional rights-based processes and the potential of costly litigation. In both the USA and the UK, the spectre of legal action and consequent costs has seen organizations turn towards mediation, viewed as offering a greater likelihood of resolution and savings in terms of staff time relative to grievance and disciplinary procedures (see Latreille and Saundry 2014). However, it has also been argued that mediation can have positive ‘upstream’ effects, acting as a catalyst for wider changes in the way organizations manage individual conflict. For example, there is evidence that it fosters conflict-handling skills (Anderson and Bingham 1997; Kressel 2006) and can enhance employer–employee relationships (Seargeant 2005). In the UK, the government has promoted mediation on the grounds that it can help transform ‘employer–employee relationships, the development of organizational culture and the development of “high-trust” relationships’ (BIS 2011: 3).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The statements are adapted from an online conflict audit offered by The Conflict Resolution Centre (http://www.conflictresolutioncentre.co.uk).

References

  • Anderson, J., & Bingham, L. (1997). Upstream effects from mediation of workplace disputes: Some preliminary evidence from the USPS. Labor Law Journal, 48, 601–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellman, H. (1998). Some reflections on the practice of mediation. Negotiation Journal, 14, 205–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bingham, L. B. (2004). Employment dispute resolution: The case for mediation. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 22(1–2), 145–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bingham, L. B., Hallberlin, C., Walker, D., & Chung, W. (2009). Dispute system design and justice in employment dispute resolution: Mediation at the workplace. Harvard Negotiation Law Review, 14, 1–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • BIS (Department of Business, Innovation and Skills) (2011). Resolving workplace disputes: A consultation. London: BIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleiman, D. (2008). ‘Should I try mediation?’ A discussion paper for trade union members. Available from: http://www.scottishmediation.org.uk/downloads/Mediationunionmemberdiscussion.pdf. Accessed 22 August 2008.

  • CIPD (2008). Workplace mediation – How employers do it? London: CIPD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colvin, A. J. S. (2003). Institutional pressures, human resource strategies, and the rise of non-union dispute resolution procedures. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 56(3), 375–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corby, S. (1999). Resolving employment rights disputes through mediation: The New Zealand experience. London: Institute of Employment Rights.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, M. (2007). A review of employment dispute resolution in Great Britain. London: DTI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L., Tuckman, A. and Snook, J. (2008). Small firms and workplace disputes resolution. Acas Research Paper, 01/08.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, T. (2008). Knowledge and use of mediation in SMEs. Acas Research Paper, 02/08.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochan, T., Lautsch, B., & Bendersky, C. (2000). An evaluation of the Massachusetts commission against discrimination alternative dispute resolution program. Harvard Negotiation Law Review, 5, 233–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kressel, K. (2006). Mediation revisited. In M. Deutsch, & P. Coleman (Eds.), The handbook of constructive conflict resolution: Theory and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Rue, H. (2000). The changing workplace environment in the new millennium: ADR is a dominant trend in the workplace. Columbia Business Law Review, 2000(3), 453–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latreille, P. L. (2011). Workplace mediation: A thematic review of the Acas/CIPD evidence. Acas Research Paper, 13/11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latreille, P., & Saundry, R. (2014). Workplace mediation. In W. K. Roche, P. Teague, & A. Colvin (Eds.), Oxford handbook of conflict management in organizations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latreille, P., Buscha, F., & Conte, A. (2012). Are you experienced? SME use of and attitudes towards workplace mediation. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(3), 590–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky, D., & Seeber, R. (2000). ‘Resolving workplace disputes in the United States: The growth of alternative dispute resolution in employment relations’ [Electronic version]. Journal of Alternative Dispute Resolution, 2, 37–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky, D., Seeber, R., & Fincher, R. (2003). Emerging systems for managing workplace conflict: Lessons from American Corporations for managers and dispute resolution professionals. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, J. F. (2001). Beyond ADR: A systems approach to conflict management. Negotiation Journal, 17(3), 207–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, J. (2003). Are your organization's conflict management practices and integrated conflict management system?. Available from: http://www.mediate.com//articles/systemsedit3.cfm. Accessed 15 April 2013.

  • Mareschal, P. (2002). Mastering the art of dispute resolution: Best practices from the FMCS. International Journal of Public Administration, 25, 1351–1377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson-Buchanan, J., & Boswell, W. (2008). An integrative model of experiencing and responding to mistreatment at work. Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 76–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pope, S. (1996). Inviting fortuitous events in mediation: The role of empowerment and recognition. Mediation Quarterly, 13(4), 287–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahim, N., Brown, A., & Graham, J. (2011). Evaluation of the Acas code of practice on disciplinary and grievance procedures. Acas Research Paper, 06/11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. (2000). Workplace mediation. In M. Liebmann (Ed.), Mediation in context. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, P., Pearlstein, A., & Mayer, B. (2005). DyADS: Encouraging ‘dynamic adaptive dispute systems' in the organized workplace. Harvard Negotiation Law Review, 10, 339–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saundry, R., McArdle, L., & Thomas, P. (2013). Reframing workplace relations? Conflict resolution and mediation in a primary care trust. Work, Employment and Society, 27(2), 221–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saundry, R., & Wibberley, G. (2012). Mediation and informal resolution – A case study in conflict management. Acas Research Paper, 12/12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saundry, R., & Wibberley, G. (2014). Workplace dispute resolution and the management of individual conflict – A thematic analysis of 5 case studies. Acas Research Paper, 06/14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seargeant, J. (2005). The Acas small firms mediation pilot: Research to explore parties’ experiences and views on the value of mediation. Acas Research Paper, 04/05.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, M. (2003). Mediation, hype and hyperbole: How much should we believe? Dispute Resolution Journal, 58(3), 43–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singletary, C., Shearer, R., & Kuligokski, E. (1995). Securing a durable mediation agreement to settle complex employment disputes. Labor Law Journal, 46, 223–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulzner, G. (2003). Adjudicators (arbitrators) acting as mediators: An experiment in dispute resolution at the Public Service Staff Relations Board of Canada. Journal of Collective Negotiations in the Public Sector, 30, 59–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ury, W., Brett, J. M., & Goldberg, S. B. (1988). Getting disputes resolved: Designing systems to cut the costs of conflict. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, S., Saundry, R., & Latreille, P. (2014). Analysis of the nature, extent and impact of grievance and disciplinary procedures and workplace mediation using WERS2011. Acas Research Paper, 10/14.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Paul Latreille or Richard Saundry .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Latreille, P., Saundry, R. (2016). Transforming the Culture of Conflict Management: Lessons from In-House Mediation. In: Saundry, R., Latreille, P., Ashman, I. (eds) Reframing Resolution. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51560-5_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics