Skip to main content

Anchoring Integrity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Practice of Integrity in Business
  • 707 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter focuses on governance and organizational integrity. First, the case study of corporate remuneration shows something of the growth of integrity and compensation philosophy which engages both meaning and relationships, focused on giving an account of justice opened to all stakeholders.

This leads to an overview of developing a culture and narrative of integrity, under the three heads of orienting, institutionalizing and sustaining. From board to reporting the focus is on a dynamic of dialogue, embodying the three modes of responsibility. This shows how integrity is anchored in the organization through engagement with vision, values, procedures and relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2022636/City-bonuses-defy-credit-crunch-and-hit-new-record-of-13bn.html

  2. 2.

    See, for instance, the CEO of VW http://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/sep/25/volkswagen-appoints-matthias-muller-chief-executive-porsche-vw

  3. 3.

    T. S. Eliot notes how the avoidance of responsibility is often seen in the desire for perfect systems,

    ‘They constantly try to escape

    From the darkness outside and within

    By dreaming of systems so perfect

    That no one will need to be good.’ (Eliot 2004, 77)

  4. 4.

    https://eiti.org/eiti

  5. 5.

    A good example of imaginative dialogue developments is from L’Oréal. They have developed a stakeholder forum (involving over 190 participants) and an online stakeholder platform. See http://www.loreal.com/commitments/sustainable-development.aspx. Accessed 12 May 2014.

  6. 6.

    http://www.leedscommunityhealthcare.nhs.uk/have_your_say/. Accessed 4/7/14.

  7. 7.

    http://www.networx.on.ca/~njdevil/mainpage/E_Eng/Academic/jj-ring.htm#4

References

  • Argyris, C. (1964). Integrating the individual and the organization. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bice, S. (2016). Responsible mining: Key principles for industry integrity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blasi, J., & Kruse, D. (2003). In the company of owners: The truth about stock options. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, M. (2004). The ethics of compensation systems. Journal of Business Ethics, 52, 149–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borrie, G., & Denn, G. (2002). Whistle blowing: the new perspective. In C. Megone & S. Robinson (Eds.), Case histories in business ethics (pp. 96–105). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucholtz, A., Young, M., & Powell, G. (1998). Are board members pawns or watchdogs? Group and Organization Management, 23(1), 6–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldecote, R. (1990). A bias against business. In Wealth Creation and Christianity (pp. 12–16). London: Industrial Christian Fellowship.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIHE (2005). Ethics matter in higher education. London: CIHE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciulla, J., Price, T., & Murphy, S. (Eds.) (2005). The quest for moral leaders. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conger, J. (2005). ‘Oh Lord won’t you buy me a Mercedes Benz’; how compensation practices are undermining the credibility of executive leaders. In J. Ciulla, T. Price, & S. Murphy (Eds.), The quest for moral leaders: Essays on leadership ethics (pp. 80–98). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J., Schoorman, F., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a Stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 488–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgar, A., & Pattison, S. (2011). The problem with integrity. Nursing Philosophy, 12(2), 81–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekanayake, S. (2004). Agency theory, national culture and management control systems. Journal of American Academy of Business, 4(1/2), 49–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliot, T. S. (2004). The rock. In The complete poems and plays. London: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G., & Dalik, A. (2012). The Wynford group. HR Reporter, June 2011 and updated January 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freidman, M. (1983). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. In T. Donaldson & P. Werhane (Eds.), Ethical issues in business (pp. 239–243). New York: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrow, D. (2015). Bearing the cross: Martin Luther King, Jr., and the Southern Christian leadership conference. New York: Open Road.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentile, M. (2010). Giving voice to values: How to speak your mind when you know what’s right. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodpaster, K. E. (2007). Conscience and corporate culture. London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J., & Cropanzano, R. (2001). Advances in organizational justice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, A., & Willis, P. (2013). Strategic public relations. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, B. (2009). Retrieved 15 January 2016, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2009/oct/21/executive-pay-bonuses-goldmansachs

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. (2005). How much is too much? A theoretical analysis of executive compensation from the standpoint of distributive justice. In R. Kolb (Ed.), The ethics of executive compensation (pp. 67–87). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinrich, K. (2007). Follower propensity to commit crimes of obedience. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 4(1), 69–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICAEW (2007). Reporting with integrity. London: ICAEW. Retrieved 12 October 2015, from http://www.icaew.com/~/media/Files/Technical/Ethics/reporting-with-integrity-report.ashx

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein, M. (2008). The living code. Sheffield: Greenleaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khurana, R. (2002). Searching for a corporate Savior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, I. I. I. (2009). King III report on corporate governance. Johannesburg: Institute of Directors in Southern Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, M. L. (1963). I have a dream… Retrieved 30 February 2015, from https://www.archives.gov/press/exhibits/dream-speech.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, R. (Ed.) (2005). The ethics of executive compensation. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, J. (1980). The quest for a code of professional ethics: An intellectual and moral confusion. In R. Chalk, M. Frankel, & S. Chafer (Eds.), AAAS professional ethics project (pp. 154–159). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1981). After virtue. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maitland, I. (2008). Virtue or control in the governance of the firm. Paper presented at the Society for Business Ethics Annual Meeting (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, I. (2013). Making it happen: Fred Goodwin, RBS and the men who blew up the British economy. London: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milkovich, G., & Rabin, B. (1991). Executive performance and firm performance. In F. Foulkes (Ed.), Executive compensation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, C., McConaughy, D., & Gobeli, D. (2000). Effectiveness of CEO pay-for performance. Review of Financial Economics, 9, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. (2012). The virtue of governance, the governance of virtue. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(2), 293–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moriarty, J. (2005). How to (try to) justify CEO pay. In R. Kolb (Ed.), The ethics of executive compensation (pp. 154–171). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nohria, N., & Khurana, R. (2008). It’s time to make management a true profession. Harvard Business Review, 86(10), 70–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, W. (2015). Rawls and corporate governance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 25(1), 29–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. (1972). Anarchy state and utopia. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterloh, M., & Frey, B. (2004). Corporate governance for crooks? The case for corporate virtue. In A. Grandori (Ed.), Corporate governance and firm organization: Microfoundations and structural forms (pp. 191–211). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine, L. (1984). Managing organizational integrity. Harvard Business Review, March/April, pp. 106–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parliamentary Commission on Banking Standards. (2013). ‘An accident waiting to happen’: The failure of HBOS. Fourth Report of Session 2012–2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Pink, D. (2011). Drive. London: Canongate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato (2005). The laws, book V. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, T. (2006). Understanding ethical failures in leadership. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raths, L., Harmin, M., & Simon, S. (1978). Values and teaching (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. (1992). Serving society. Nottingham: Grove Ethics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S., & Smith, J. (2014). Co-charismatic leadership. Oxford: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossouw, D., & Van Vuuren, L. (2004). Business ethics (3rd ed.). Cape Town: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, J.-J. (2004). Discourse on the origin of inequality. London: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozuel, C. (2011). The moral threat of compartmentalization: Self, roles and responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 102, 685–697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1997). Economics, business principles and moral sentiments. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7(3), 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of a learning organization. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, W. (2005). Justice, incentives and executive compensation. In R. Kolb (Ed.), The ethics of executive compensation (pp. 87–100). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R. (1992). Ethics and excellence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnenfeld, J. (2002). What makes great boards great. Harvard Business Review, September, pp. 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, L., & Balls, E. (2015). Report of the commission on inclusive prosperity. Washington: Center for American Progress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tawney, R. H. (1930). Equality. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. (2005). Executive pay in public academia. In R. Kolb (Ed.), The ethics of executive compensation (pp. 140–153). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M., & Bevan, D. (Eds.) (2013). Wise management in organisational complexity. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L., & Nelson, K. (2008). Managing business ethics: Straight talk about how to do it right. London: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • UK Corporate Governance Code. (2012). London: FRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • UK Stewardship Code. (2012). London: FRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhezen, P. (2010). Giving voice in a culture of silence. From a culture of compliance to a culture of integrity. Journal of Business Ethics, 96, 187–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Western, S. (2008). Leadership: A Critical Text. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeats, W. B. (1916). Responsibilities. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Robinson, S. (2016). Anchoring Integrity. In: The Practice of Integrity in Business. Palgrave Studies in Governance, Leadership and Responsibility. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51553-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics