Abstract
This chapter begins to explore the third mode of responsibility: responsibility for. The importance of this mode of responsibility is that it moves us specifically into the ‘walk’, the taking action of integrity. However, as we might expect from the reflection on the other modes of responsibility, it does not supply us with any easier guidance for integrity. The case of Nestlé is used to introduce the complexities of responsibility in practice. This will introduce positive responsibility (as distinct from legal liability), moving beyond accountability, into responsibility for projects, people, purpose or place.
Some the great post-Holocaust thinkers argue from this for a sense of universal responsibility. Jonas takes this further, arguing for a sense of ultimate accountability to and responsibility for future generations and the environment. The chapter details that responsibility in the light of the Nestlé case and how it informs a view of proactive integrity which involves: a sense of multiple responsibility for clients, colleagues, profession, community and so on; the assumption of responsibility in grey areas not assigned to roles, avoiding denial of responsibility; further development of ethical identity through negotiation of responsibility; the development of shared and mutual responsibility as distinct from shared interest; focus on positive creative action through the increase in possibilities and pathways, further developing identity; and the practice of justice and sustainability through shared responsibility.
Notes
- 1.
De George notes that debates about justice are a key feature in international business ethics; R. De George, International Business Ethics, in R. Frederick (ed.), A Companion to Business Ethics (Oxford: Blackwells, 233–242).
- 2.
Used, for instance, to determine the regional language to be used for marketing in areas where several different languages were used.
References
Arendt, H. (1991). Organized guilt and universal responsibility. In L. May & H. Hoffman (Eds.), Collective responsibility: Five decades of debate in theoretical and applied ethics. Savage: Rowbottom and Littlefield.
Bauman, Z. (1989). Modernity and the Holocaust. London: Polity.
Bauman, Z. (1993). Postmodern ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Berlin, I. (1968). Two concepts of liberty. In A. Quinton (Ed.), Political philosophy (pp. 141–155). London: Penguin.
Birnbacher, D. (2001). Philosophical foundations of responsibility. In A. Auhagen & H.-W. Bierhoff (Eds.), Responsibility: The many faces of a social phenomenon (pp. 9–22). London: Routledge.
Brabeck-Letmathe, P. (2015). http://www.cnbc.com/2015/03/24/Nestlé-chairman-time-to-turn-off-the-water-taps.html
Brown, M. (2005). Corporate integrity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Corfino, J. (2013). http://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/Nestlé-peter-brabeck-attitude-water-change-stewardship
Crane, A., Palazzo, G., Spence, L., & Matten, D. (2014). Contesting the value of ‘creating shared value’. California Management Review, 56(2), 130–153.
De George, R. (1999). International business ethics. In R. Frederick (Ed.), A companion to business ethics (pp. 233–242). Oxford: Blackwell.
Finch, J., & Mason, J. (1993). Negotiating family responsibilities. London: Routledge.
Hendricks, R., and Morely, D. (1973). The baby food tragedy. New Internationalist, August, Issue 006.
IGBM (1997). Cracking the code. London: IGBM.
Jelliffe, D. (1971). Commerciogenic malnutrition? Time for a dialogue. Food Technology, 15, 55–56.
Jonas, H. (1984). The imperative of responsibility. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Kaldor, M. (2003). Civil society and accountability. Journal of Human Development, 4(1), 5–27.
Lederach, J. P. (2005). The moral imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Levinas, E. (1998). Entre nous; the thinking of the other. New York: Columbia University Press.
Lovelock, J. (1979). Gaia: A new look at life on earth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mason, M. (2001). The ethics of integrity: Educational values beyond postmodern ethics. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 35(1), 47–69.
May, L. (1992). Sharing responsibility. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Mitchell, R., Agle, B., & Wood, D. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. The Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.
Muller, M. (2013). http://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/Nestlé-baby-milk-scandal-food-industry-standards.
Nestlé, H. (1869). Memorial on the nutrition of infants. Vevey: Loertscher.
Nestlé, H. (2014). http://www.Nestlé.com/asset-library/documents/library/documents/corporate_social_responsibility/Nestlé-commitment-water-stewardship.pdf
Newton, L. (1999). Truth is the daughter of time: The real story of the Nestlé case. Business and Society Review, 104(4), 367–395.
Oyugi, J. (2012). Watering their graves: Breast milk substitutes and supplements in developing countries. wH2o: The Journal of Gender and Water, 1(1), 14–15.
Porter, M. (2011). Harvard Business Review. Retrieved 11 November 2015, from http://hbr.org/2011/01/the-big-idea-creating-shared-value/sb1
Porter, M., & Kramer, M. (2011). Creating shared value: How to reinvent capitalism—And unleash a wave of innovation and growth. Harvard Business Review, January–February 2011, pp. 62–77.
Ricoeur, P. (1992). Oneself as another. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
Ricoeur, P. (2000). The concept of responsibility: An essay in semantic analysis. In The just (trans. D. Pellauer). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Robinson, S. (2015). Islam, responsibility and business in the thought of Fethullah Gulen. Journal of Business Ethics, 128, 369–381.
Robinson, S., Dixon, R., Preece, C., & Moodley, C. (2012). Engineering, professional and business ethics. London: Heinemann Butterworth.
Sacks, J. (2007). The home we build together: Recreating society. London: Continuum.
Sethi, S. (2012). Multinational corporations and the impact of public advocacy on corporate strategy. London: Springer.
Singer, P. (2004). One world: The ethics of globalization. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Spohn, W. (1997). Spirituality and ethics. Theological Studies, 58, 109–122.
Sunday Times. (2014). Retrieved 25 October 2015, from http://livewire.amnesty.org/2010/02/14/amnesty-international-response-to-the-sunday-times/
UNICEF (1993). An end to ambiguities. New York: UNICEF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Robinson, S. (2016). Integrity and Positive Responsibility. In: The Practice of Integrity in Business. Palgrave Studies in Governance, Leadership and Responsibility. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51553-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51553-7_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-51552-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-51553-7
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)