Skip to main content

Integrity and Accountability: Being True to Others

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The Practice of Integrity in Business
  • 761 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter sets out the meaning of accountability, arguing that it is central to integrity. Focusing on the case of the Mid Staffs Hospital Trust, it explores mutual accountability for meaning and practice and plural accountability (including to colleagues, profession, client, institution and so on). Central to this is responsibility for relationships, being true to them. Breakdown of the practice of this integrity is characterized as analogous to a breakdown of health. This view of accountability is critically contrasted with the corporate capture of accountability, where one contract is dominant. Narrow perspectives are then contrasted with the complexity of businesses relationship to the social environment, inside and outside the organization.

The chapter, then, focuses on the practice of dialogue as the means of engaging complexity and practising accountability, illustrated by the example of Henry V at Agincourt, and ends by noting the connection between the first two modes of responsibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For example, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/heal-our-hospitals/10130024/Name-the-NHS-Watchdog-staff-responsible-for-hospital-cover-up-minister-says.html

  2. 2.

    http://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/compassion-in-practice.pdf. Accessed 2/2/13.

  3. 3.

    Cf. the DVD The Inside Job, 2010.

  4. 4.

    Adrian Furnham, The Elephant in the Boardroom (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2004).

  5. 5.

    http://www.jnj.com/about-jnj/jnj-credo

  6. 6.

    http://www.jnj.com/about-jnj/jnj-credo

  7. 7.

    https://www.jnj.com/sites/default/files/pdf/Code-of-Business-Conduct-English-US.pdf

  8. 8.

    Ibid.

  9. 9.

    https://www.cipd.co.uk/binaries/5740CodeofConduct.pdf

  10. 10.

    http://www.cipr.co.uk/content/about-us/public-relations-register/cipr-code-conduct

  11. 11.

    https://www.prsa.org/aboutprsa/ethics/codeenglish/#.VqzHxvmLTDc

  12. 12.

    http://www.totalprofessions.com/profession-finder

  13. 13.

    Richard II, Henry IV parts 1 and 2.

  14. 14.

    Who rightly argues for communicative action (focused in relationships) rather than instrumental action, goal-oriented behaviour.

  15. 15.

    Such contracts can also be formal and also can involve the establishment of boundaries. Hence, Henry newly crowned in Henry IV Part 2, Act V, scene v, firmly places Falstaff’s outside the boundary of dialogue (reflecting Falstaff’s nihilistic perspective).

References

  • Adams, D., & Hamm, H. (1990). Cooperative learning—Critical thinking and collaboration across the curriculum. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Airaksinen, T. (1994). Service and science in professional life. In R. Chadwick (Ed.), Ethics and the professions (pp. 1–13). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. (2007). Knowledge for action: A guide to overcoming barriers to organizational change. New York: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin: University of Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1989). Modernity and the Holocaust. London: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Beauvoir, S. (1997). The ethics of ambiguity. Secaucus, NJ: Carol Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, N., & Lemoine, G. (2014). What VUCA really means for you. Harvard Business Review, 92(1), 24–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, I. (1968). Two concepts of liberty. In A. Quinton (Ed.), Political philosophy (pp. 141–155). London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boseley, S. (2010). Mid Staffordshire NHS trust left patients humiliated and in pain. The Guardian, February 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. (2005). Corporate integrity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, D. (1983). Religious ethics and pastoral care. Philadelphia: Fortress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. (2013). Mid Staffs hospital scandal: The essential guide. The Guardian, February 6, pp. 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIPD (2014). Research report: Experiencing trustworthy leadership. London: CIPD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council, N. (1973). When honour’s at stake: The idea of honour in Shakespeare’s plays. New York: Barnes and Noble.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D., La Caze, M., & Levine, M. (1999). Should we strive for integrity? Journal of Value Inquiry, 33(4), 519–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruver, B. (2003). Enron: Anatomy of greed. London: Arrow Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, E. M. (1984). Ambiguity as strategy in organizational communication. Communication Monographs, 51, 227–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis Report (2010). Robert Francis Inquiry report into Mid-Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust. London: House of Commons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis Report. (2013). The Mid Staffordshire Foundation Trust Public Enquiry. Retrieved August 18, 2015, from http://www.midstaffspublicinquiry.com/

  • Friedman, M. (1983). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. In T. Donaldson & P. Werhane (Eds.), Ethical issues in business (pp. 239–243). New York: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A. (2004). The elephant in the boardroom. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentile, M. (2014). Giving voice to values. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodpaster, K. (2007). Conscience and corporate culture. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, A., & Willis, P. (2013). Strategic public relations leadership. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1992). Moral consciousness and communicative action. London: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halligan, P., Bass, C., & Marshall, J. (Eds.) (2001). Contemporary approaches to the study of hysteria: Clinical and theoretical perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heifetz, R., Grashow, A., & Linsky, M. (2009). The practice of adaptive leadership: Tools and tactics for changing your organization and the world. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICAEW (2009). Reporting with integrity. London: ICAEW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illich, I. (1977). Disabling professions. London: Marion Boyars.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson & Johnson Credo. http://www.jnj.com/about-jnj/jnj-credo

  • McKenna, B., & Rooney, D. (2011). Wisdom in organisations: Whence and whither. Social Epistemology, 21(2), 113–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, O. (2000). A question of trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakshott, M. (1962). Rationalism in politics and other essays. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine, L. (1994). Managing organizational integrity. Harvard Business Review, March/April, pp. 106–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, W. (1989). Communication and the human condition. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. (2013). Hearing voices: Wisdom responsibility and leadership. In M. Thompson & D. Bevan (Eds.), Wise management in organisational complexity. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S., Dixon, R., Preece, C., & Moodley, C. (2012). Engineering, professional and business ethics. London: Heinemann Butterworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S., & Kenyon, A. (2009). Ethics and the alcohol industry. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S., & Smith, J. (2014). Co-Charismatic leadership. Oxford: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozuel, C. (2011). The moral threat of compartmentalization: Self, roles and responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 102, 685–697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, J. (2007). The home we build together: Recreating society. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seddon, J. (2014). The Whitehall effect. London: Triarchy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidorkin, A. (1999). Beyond discourse: Education, the self and dialogue. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R. (1992). Ethics and excellence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R. (2007). True to our feelings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivasta, S., & Barrett, F. J. (1989). Foundations for executive integrity: Dialogue, diversity, development. In S. Srivasta et al. (Eds.), Executive integrity: The search for high human values in organisational life. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, E. (2000). Just business. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tawney, R. H. (1930). Equality. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorlby, R., Smith, J., Williams, S., & Dayan, M. (2004). The Francis report: One year on. London: Nuffield Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L., & Nelson, K. (2008). Managing business ethics. London: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Robinson, S. (2016). Integrity and Accountability: Being True to Others. In: The Practice of Integrity in Business. Palgrave Studies in Governance, Leadership and Responsibility. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51553-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics