Skip to main content

Mission Accomplished: The Reelection of George W. Bush

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Politics of Emotions, Candidates, and Choices
  • 302 Accesses

Abstract

The 2004 presidential campaign is analyzed. The first post-9/11 presidential election was heavily influenced by US foreign policy and Bush’s War on Terror. The influence and effect of the campaign narratives of George W. Bush and John F. Kerry and voters’ response are considered. The influence of four emotional dimensions on voter appraisal of campaign issues and Bush-era government policies are studied. The results suggest that voters’ feelings toward George W. Bush and John F. Kerry were important to the evaluations made about campaign issues covering topics on domestic and international concerns. Voters’ emotions seem to have a more profound effect on policy appraisals than on social issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abramowitz, Alan I., and Walter J. Stone. 2006. The Bush effect: Polarization, turnout, and activism in the 2004 presidential election. Presidential Studies Quarterly 36(May): 141–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abramson, Paul R., John H. Aldrich, David W. Rohde, and Jill Rickershauser. 2007a. Fear in the voting booth: The 2004 presidential election. Political Behavior 29: 197–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abramson, Paul R., John H. Aldrich, and David W. Rohde (eds.). 2007b. Change and continuity in the 2004 and 2006 elections. Washington DC: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armor, David J. 1996. Race and gender in the U.S. military. Armed Forces and Society 23(Fall): 7–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, Berhard. 1983. The logic and limits of trust. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boydstun, Amber E. 2008. How policy issues become front-page news. Doctoral Dissertation, the Pennsylvania State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brader, Ted Allen. 2005. Striking a responsive chord: How political ads motivate and persuade voters by appealing to emotions. American Journal of Political Science 49(April): 388–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brader, Ted Allen. 2006. Campaigning for hearts and minds: How political ads use emotions to sway the electorate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, David E. 2007. The 2004 election: A matter of faith?. In A matter of faith, ed. David Campbell. Washington DC: The Brookings Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, David E. (ed.). 2007b. A matter of faith. Washington DC: The Brookings Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, James E. 2007. Do swing voters swing elections?. In Swing voters in American politics, ed. William G. Mayer. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A., Miller, W, Converse, and P. Stokes. 1960. The American voter. New York: Wiley Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, David E., and J. Quin Monson. 2007. The religion card: Gay marriage and the 2004 presidential election. Public Opinion Quarterly 72(August): 299–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claibourn, Michele P. 2011. Presidential campaigns and presidential accountability. Chicago: University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conley, Patricia. 2005. The presidential race of 2004: Strategy, outcome, and mandate. In A defining moment: The presidential election of 2004, ed. William Crotty. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe

    Google Scholar 

  • Crotty, William. 2005. The Bush presidency: Establishing the agenda for the campaign. In A defining moment: The presidential election of 2004, ed. William Crotty. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denton, Robert E. (ed.). 2005. The 2004 presidential campaign. New York: Rowman and Littlefield Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djupe, Paul A., Eric McDaniel, and Jacob R. Neiheisel. 2007. The politics of the religious minorities vote in the 2004 elections. In Religion and the Bush presidency, ed. Mark J. Rozell and Gleaves Whitney. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drew, Dan, and David Weaver. 2006. Voter learning in the 2004 presidential election: Did the media matter? Journalism and Mass Communications Quarterly 83(March): 25–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiorina, Morris. P. 2006. Further reflections on the culture war thesis. In Is there a culture war? A dialogue on values and American public life, ed. James Davison Hunter et al. Washington D.C.: Pew Research Center- Brookings Institute Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, Lawrence. 2006. The transformation of strategic affairs. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, Girish J., Marion R. Just, and Ann N. Crigler. 2004. New coverage of political campaigns. In Handbook of political communication research, ed. Lynda Lee Kaid. Mahwah: Taylor & Francis—Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington, Marc J., and Michael Nelson. 2003. Anatomy of a rally effect: George W. Bush and the war on terrorism. Political Science and Politics 36(January): 37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huddy, Leonie, and Anna H. Gunnthorsdottir. 2000. The persuasive effects of emotive visual imagery: Superficial manipulation or the product of passionate reason? Political Psychology 21: 745–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, Gary C. 2005. Polarized politics and the 2004 congressional and presidential elections. Political Science Quarterly 120(summer):199–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, Gary C. 2007. A divider, not a uniter. George W. Bush and the American people. Boston: Pearson Longman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, Gary C. 2009. The 2008 presidential and congressional elections: Anti-Bush referendum and prospects for the Democratic Majority. Political Science Quarterly 124(spring):1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, Gary C. 2009b. The effects of the George W. Bush presidency on partisan attitudes. Presidential Studies Quarterly 39(June): 172–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaid, Lynda Lee. 2004. The handbook of political communication research. Mahwah: Taylor & Francis—Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuypers, Jim. A. 2006. Bush’s war: media bias and justifications for war in a terrorist age. Rowman & Littlefield Pub Inc.: Lanham, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, Gary, and Jon Cohen. 2005. Voters and values in the 2004 election. Public Opinion Quarterly 69(June): 175–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellow, Nicole. 2005. Voting behavior: The 2004 election and the roots of republican success. In The elections of 2004, ed. Michael Nelson. Washington DC: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Michael. 2005. The settings: George W. Bush, majority president. In The election of 2004, ed. Michael Nelson. Washington DC: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Michael (ed.). 2005. The elections of 2004. Washington DC: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norpoth, Helmut, and Andrew H. Sidman. 2007. Mission accomplished: The wartime election of 2004. Political Behavior 29: 175–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomper, Gerald M. 2005. The presidential election: The ills of American politics after 9/11. In The election of 2004. ed. Michael Nelson. Washington DC: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomper, Gerald. 2007. The new role of the conventions as political rituals. In Rewiring politics: Presidential nominating conventions in the media age. Louisiana State University Press. Baton Rouge, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quirk, Paul J., and C. Matheson. 2005. The 2004 elections and the prospects for leadership. In The elections of 2004, ed. Michael Nelson. Washington DC: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Paul. 2004. A war on terror: Afghanistan and after. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabato, Larry J. 2006. Divided states of America: The slash and burn politics of the 2004 presidential election. Boston: Pearson Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandler, Todd. 2006. The political economy of terrorism. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Craig Allen. 2005. Candidate strategies in the 2004 presidential campaign: Instrumental choices faced by the incumbent and his challengers. In The 2004 presidential campaign, ed. Robert E. Denton Jr. New York: Rowman and Littlefield Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steenbergen, Marco R., and Christopher Ellis. 2006. Fear and loathing in American elections: Context, traits, and negative candidate affect. In Feeling politics: Emotion in political information processing, ed. David P. Redlawsk. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, Herbert F., and Dino P. Christenson. 2007. Changing horses in wartime? The 2004 presidential election. Political Behavior 29(June): 279–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, Hewitt L. 1996. The gender gap in attitudes toward the Gulf War: A cross-national perspective. Journal of Peace Research. (February): 67–82

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Appendix: Variable and Analysis Description

Appendix: Variable and Analysis Description

Campaign Issues

Analysis was conducted using survey data from the 2004 American National Election Studies (ANES) time series pre-election sample. The dependent variables were issues that represented the political issues of each party’s agenda in three categories: domestic issues, foreign affairs, and morality politics. Eight issues in total were regressed against three categories of independent variables.

The dependent variables for domestic topics were (1) the economy and (2) domestic security. With regard to foreign affairs, four issues were chosen. Two issues were selected to get at general attitudes of foreign affairs that included (1) evaluation of foreign relations and (2) the War on Terror. Then, more specifically, two variables on (3) the war in Iraq and (4) Afghanistan were selected to measure attitudes on specific military actions. Finally, on the topic of morality politics, two issues were examined: first, same-sex marriage and, second, government-funded abortion.

Emotional Dimensions

The first set of control variables is the ANES measure for emotion: pride, hope, fear, and anger. The second set of control variables is political determinants such as party identification and ideology. The final set of independent variables is the controls for demographic information.

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yates, H.E. (2016). Mission Accomplished: The Reelection of George W. Bush. In: The Politics of Emotions, Candidates, and Choices. Palgrave Pivot, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51527-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics